Developing a framework for the improvement of stakeholder management plans
Blessing Dirani ORCID ↗ · Ranzi Mazenge Rusike · David Damiyano · Josphat Nyoni
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025 · Vol. 14 / Issue 7 · 108-125
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 03:25 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The study aims to develop a framework for stakeholder management planning to guide entities in using holistic structured and tailored approaches that effectively guide stakeholder management. The study was inspired by perceived inadequacies of current frameworks to provide actionable solutions to stakeholder management planning. The study is underpinned by pragmatism and involves mixed methods research consisting of quantitative and qualitative approaches. A stratified random sampling method is used with the target population being 55 companies listed on the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange covering the period 2019-2023. The theoretical framework was anchored on the stakeholder theory by Edward Freeman (1984). Questionnaires (n=215) are analysed using SPSS version 26 while 12 semi-structured interview guides are analysed using NVIV0 version 14 with 10 local corporate governance practitioners validating the framework. The Quantitative techniques used are Cronbach alpha, exploratory factor analysis, regression and ANOVA. Findings were that variables from the study namely the definitive / latent criteria, communication, engagement and collaboration sub-plans are sufficiently positively related to stakeholder management planning and several sub-themes emerged around them to produce a holistic framework of stakeholder management planning. The framework is expected to see the improvement of stakeholder management planning in practice.
Keywords: {'name': 'Stakeholder Management Plan'}, {'name': 'Stakeholder Engagement Plan'}, {'name': 'Stakeholder Communication plan'}, {'name': 'Stakeholder Collaboration Plan'}, {'name': 'Definitive / Expectant / Latent Stakeholders'}
Authors & affiliations
Blessing Dirani
Women's University in Africa
Ranzi Mazenge Rusike
Affiliation not supplied
David Damiyano
Affiliation not supplied
Josphat Nyoni
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.009
Accountability.org. (2025). Accountability.org. https://www.accountability.org
DOI: 10.4324/9781003095385-12
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002661
Balestrin, A., & Verschoore, J. (2008). Redes de cooperação empresarial: Estratégias de gestão na nova economia.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-65909-6_35
DOI: 10.1080/13562576.2012.721504
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
DOI: 10.1111/puar.13505
Bryson, J. M., Quick, K. S., Slotterback, C. S., & Crosby, B. C. (2021). Designing public participation processes. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 559–573.
Chinyio, E., & Olomolaiye, P. (2023). Mapping communication to stakeholder power and engagement. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(5), 1550–1572.
DOI: 10.4468/2019.1.04civera.freeman
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4738-6
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
Cramfield, D. (2020). The PMC does not exist—and why it matters for socialists. New Politics. https://newpol.org/the-pmc-does-not-exist-and-why-it-matters-for-socialists/
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-1-4129-6557-6
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed., pp. 213–246). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000725
DOI: 10.4324/9781315245881
Eyiaro, S. J. (2023). The impact of stakeholder management on project team performance. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24109.87528
Fernandez, D., & Yeo, K. (2022). Adaptive communication in agile stakeholder environments. Project Management Journal, 53(4), 339–354.
DOI: 10.1108/JEPP-03-2021-0033
Field, A. (2021). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
DOI: 10.1177/002224378101800104
DOI: 10.3280/FR2023-002005
Freeman, B. (2013). Revisiting the policy cycle. In Association of Tertiary Education Management (ATEM), Developing policy in tertiary institutions. Northern Metropolitan Institute of TAFE (NMIT).
DOI: 10.4324/9781003388227-4
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2023). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success (Rev. ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300265179/managing-for-stakeholders/
DOI: 10.1017/9781108539500
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107765
Gao, Y., & Zhang, M. (2021). Communication quality and stakeholder engagement: Evidence from large-scale infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management, 39(2), 112–124.
Griffin, R. W., Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (2017). Organizational behavior: Managing people and organizations (pp. 551–557). Cengage Learning.
DOI: 10.1504/IJPOM.2024.143154
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2020). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01252-1
Hall, K. L., Vogel, A. L., & Croyle, R. T. (2022). The role of thematic areas in structuring transdisciplinary research. Research Policy, 51(1), 104386.
Hamzah, F. (2025). Adaptive communication strategies for agile IT project management. [Unpublished manuscript].
DOI: 10.3390/su9020165
Institute of Directors in South Africa (IoDSA). (2016). IoDSA. https://www.iodsa.co.za
International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW). (2024). IFAW. https://www.ifaw.org
KPMG. (2023). Global project management survey.
DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.319
Lee, J., & Kim, S. (2021). Prioritising stakeholders in smart city projects: A salience-based communication approach. Cities, 114, 103195.
DOI: 10.1037/amp0000151
DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2383322
DOI: 10.1504/IJPOM.2009.027540
DOI: 10.3389/frsut.2023.1209325
DOI: 10.1186/s13750-019-0168-0
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114104
DOI: 10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2020.v12i1.490
DOI: 10.4102/sajesbm.v13i1.356
Masvingo, Z. (2023). External audit as a corporate governance tool in mitigating corporate scandals and public entities’ decay: A case of Zimbabwe Electricity Supply Authority (ZESA) Holdings (Doctoral dissertation, Great Zimbabwe University).
DOI: 10.4324/9781003256014-11
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
Mitchell, R. K., Weaver, G. R., Agle, B. R., Bailey, A. D., & Carlson, J. (2022). Stakeholder agency and stakeholder theory: A theoretical elaboration with illustrations from business and society research. Business & Society, 61(4), 701–747. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211018023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.007
DOI: 10.59573/emsj.8(4).2024.27
DOI: 10.26524/jms.12.14
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-021-04407-9
DOI: 10.1108/IJMPB-05-2018-0093
Nguyen, T. P., Chih, Y. Y., & Spang, K. (2022). Information exchange quality and stakeholder engagement in project management. Project Management Journal, 53(4), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728221085984
Niemann, M., & Hoppe, H. (2023). Ethics and power in stakeholder communication models. Journal of Business Ethics, 184(3), 579–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05146-8
NPCC (Policy Consensus Initiative). (2015). What is collaborative governance? https://policyconsensus.org/publications/reports/collaborative_governance
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.08.001
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Frels, R. K. (2016). Seven steps to a comprehensive literature review: A multimodal and cultural approach. SAGE Publications.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). Economic outlook (Vol. 2020, Issue 2). https://www.oecd.org
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). Enhancing public trust in COVID-19 communication. https://www.oecd.org
Petticrew, M., Knai, C., & Thomas, J. (2022). Implications of evidence gaps in public health: A research agenda. The Lancet Public Health, 7(5), e367–e376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00068-0
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute.
DOI: 10.4337/9781782548508.00022
DOI: 10.1108/S2514-175920170000005
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101645
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.10.001
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2845-4
DOI: 10.3390/su141811765
DOI: 10.3726/b21820
DOI: 10.1002/csr.1947
Stuart, G. (2020, March 12). What is praxis? Sustaining Community. https://sustainingcommunity.wordpress.com/2020/03/12/what-is-praxis/
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1953
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
DOI: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Torraco, R. J. (2020). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 19(3), 229–247.
Turner, R., & Zolin, R. (2020). Forecasting success on large projects: Developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames. Project Management Journal, 51(3), 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820915052
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2022). Inclusive communication strategies for development projects.
DOI: 10.1111/joms.12785
Yang, J., Shen, G. Q., Ho, M., Drew, D. S., & Chan, A. P. C. (2018). Exploring critical success factors for stakeholder management in construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 24(5), 397–407. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2018.5215
DOI: 10.1080/19368623.2021.1926037
Zhou, X., & Wang, Y. (2020). A network-based approach to stakeholder communication. International Journal of Project Management, 38(6), 331–342.
Zimcode. (2015). Public Entities Corporate Governance Act (10:31). Government of Zimbabwe.