Evaluating the preferences of stakeholders of a comprehensive higher education institution on the modality of applying for academic records
Ferwin Jimenez ORCID ↗ · Maureen Gelle-Jimenez ORCID ↗ · Kristine Joyce Dela Paz · Francis Ross Gervacio · Julian Lucas Lozano · Tiffany Anne Magbitang
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025 · Vol. 14 / Issue 7 · 232-242
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 02:50 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This study focuses on evaluating the preferences of stakeholders of a comprehensive higher education institution located in Manila, Philippines, regarding the process of applying for academic records. Onsite application is the traditional process wherein the stakeholders transact personally on campus to request for needed documents. The online system enables remote application of academic records supported by technology. It is marked by the ability to make the application anywhere and anytime, at the convenience of the stakeholder. The study highlights that both the online and onsite modalities have advantages available to stakeholders. Through qualitative and quantitative methodologies, factors influencing the preference of stakeholders are identified. Though the online application is overwhelmingly preferred by the respondents, the onsite application remains relevant. Combining the advantages of both modalities promote convenience on the part of the stakeholders and empowers them to make contextual choices depending on their preferences. Determining the preferences of stakeholders allows the academic institution to tailor-fit services and fine-tune processes to meet, or even exceed, the expectations of stakeholders. The results of the study can be used as a guide by academic institutions on how to improve the various modalities used to provide efficient customer service to stakeholders.
Keywords: {'name': 'Academic records'}, {'name': 'Online application'}, {'name': 'Onsite application'}
Authors & affiliations
Ferwin Jimenez
University of Santo Tomas
Maureen Gelle-Jimenez
University of Santo Tomas
Kristine Joyce Dela Paz
University of Santo Tomas
Francis Ross Gervacio
University of Santo Tomas
Julian Lucas Lozano
University of Santo Tomas
Tiffany Anne Magbitang
University of Santo Tomas
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1108/JFRA-05-2020-0151
DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20184400005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3452668
Ananth, C. (2018). Policy Document on Academic Support System of Students, Securing Student’s Records and New Student Induction at Higher Quality Accredited Institutions, International Journal of Advanced Research in Management, Architecture, Technology and Engineering (IJARMATE), 4(3), 207-212. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13862.27205.
DOI: 10.30871/deca.v5i01.2942
Arndt, T. (2018). Empowering University Students with Blockchain-based Transcripts, 15th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2018).
DOI: 10.1108/IJLMA-08-2023-0198
DOI: 10.1109/ICOEI65986.2025.11013158
DOI: 10.3390/app11041842
Caraan, H. & Caraan, L., 2024. Understanding Kaizen in Basic Educational Institutions in Manila, Philippines. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 13(2), 239-250.
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-020-07379-y
Etrata, A., Macatual, S., Lee, J., & Raborar, J. 2025. Service Quality of Quick Service Restaurants as Perceived by Millennials Using the SERVQUAL Model: The Mediating Effects of Corporate Image and Customer Trust. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 14(1), 498-518.
Gelle-Jimenez, M. & Aguiling, H. M. (2021). Leveraging Congruence of Values in the Workplace during Pandemic Times: An Empirical Study, Business Management Dynamics, 10(8), 11–23.
DOI: 10.4108/eai.17-6-2024.2349065
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2018.10.003
DOI: 10.36227/techrxiv.18480509.v3
DOI: 10.25082/AMLER.2021.01.005
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.281
DOI: 10.26483/ijarcs.v10i5.6479
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.287
Muntaqheem, M. & Raiker, S. (2019). A Study in Consumer Behavior towards Online and Offline Shopping, IRE Journals, 3(4).
DOI: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2018.05.012
DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.220601.049
Reyes, R. & Castro-Garcia, M. (2019). Admissions and Registration towards Quality Delivery of Services in a Catholic Higher Educational Institution, Institutional Multidisciplinary Research and Development Journal, 2(2019). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36037.29925.
DOI: 10.3126/jpd.v5i1.67547
Trombley, E. (2020). Fraudulent Transcripts, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.
Uhlig, R., Yonts, R., Cashman, B. & Clark, R. (2019). Blocktranscripts- a Blockchain System for University Transcripts, American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2—31816.
Veloso, E., Orellana, A. & Reeves, J. (2018). Teaching Qualitative Research Online: Using Technology to Leverage Student Engagement, FDLA Journal, 3(6).
DOI: 10.47191/ijmra/v4-i12-21