The implications of integration of cultural diversity facets in higher education
Malesela Masenya ORCID ↗
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2025 · Vol. 7 / Issue 2 · 430-435
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 03:03 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 03:03 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper to discuss the impacts of diversity in the educational setting, it seems necessary ?rst to de?ne some key terms, including culture and cultural diversity. The paper purely theoretical, therefore, information will solicited through literature review to present arguments. Teaching culturally diverse classrooms starts from embracing beliefs that recognise the strengths of cultural diversity. Beliefs are seen as individual cognitive conceptions in constant relation to behaviour and the external environment. Bidirectional relationships exist between personal beliefs, behaviour, and the external environment, but their influence and reciprocal effects vary for different activities and under different circumstances. Diversity has become an increasingly important part of lecturers’ lives beyond school, and even within the classroom it can also help increase their understanding of complex issues of diversity students are confronted with. Similar all social behaviour, teaching and learning is shaped through acculturation and different cultural backgrounds. Most people expect a learning and teaching environment that they are used to from their own educational experience as a student. Teaching in intercultural educational environments should be sensitive to different cultural styles of learning and teaching. This sensitivity is essential, regardless of the subject, whether it is a universal scientific phenomena or not. Paper argues that although cultural groups share commonalties in perspectives, behaviours, and ways of being in the world, they are rarely homogenous. The paper concludes that inclusion of diversity especially when dealing with different cultures is important because it helps with systematic and organized process of applying which strategies and theories to improve the quality of education.
Keywords: {'name': 'Higher Education'}, {'name': 'Diversity'}, {'name': 'Pedagogy'}
Authors & affiliations
Malesela Masenya
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1080/0729436052000318541
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.007
DOI: 10.1080/03098770701781481
DOI: 10.1007/s11162-008-9090-y
DOI: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
DOI: 10.1080/03075070120076309
Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Forgas, J. P. (2000). Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.
DOI: 10.3102/00346543074001059
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. (2005). School engagement. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 305-321). New York: Springer.
DOI: 10.1080/03075070410001682538
Hand, L., & Bryson, C. (2008). “Conclusions and implications”. In L. Hand & C. Bryson (Eds.), SEDA special 22: Aspects of student engagement (pp. 41–42). Nottingham: Staff and Educational Development Association.
DOI: 10.1007/BF03216875
Harris, R., Bolander, K., Lebrun, M., Docq, F., & Bouvy, M. (n.d.). Linking perceptions of control and signs of engagement in the process and content of collaborative e-learning. Paper presented at Network Learning Conference, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
DOI: 10.1007/BF03340893
DOI: 10.1353/csd.2007.0054
DOI: 10.1080/02601370117754
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00164.x
DOI: 10.1080/09585190701638077
DOI: 10.58680/rte199115462
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research, Vol. 2. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
DOI: 10.1007/s10755-005-5015-2
DOI: 10.1353/csd.2006.0061
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.09.002
DOI: 10.1177/07417130122087304
DOI: 10.1080/02680930210140257
DOI: 10.3102/00346543045001089
Trowler, V., & Trowler, P. (2010). Student engagement evidence summary. York, UK: Higher Education Academy.
DOI: 10.3102/0002831209361209
DOI: 10.3200/JRLP.143.1.91-112