The influence of organisational ambidexterity on digital efficacy: The moderating role of digital skills

Abstract

In the face of fast technological improvements, higher education institutions must strike a balance between leveraging existing strengths and pursuing new opportunities to succeed. This study examines how organisational ambidexterity affects digital efficacy in Zimbabwean state universities, with a focus on the moderating influence that digital skills play. A cross-sectional research design was employed to collect data from 110 academic and administrative staff at three Zimbabwean state universities through digital platforms. The findings show a positive relationship between organisational ambidexterity and digital efficacy, with digital skills significantly moderating the relationship. Universities with ambidextrous staff have higher levels of academic excellence, research productivity, and stakeholder satisfaction. Due to limited time and funds, the study only focused on three state universities, but it would be interesting to explore private universities in the future. This research provides valuable insights for Zimbabwean state universities to enhance their digital capabilities. By fostering a balance between exploitation and exploration of digital innovations and investing in digital skills development, universities can improve their digital competence and competitiveness. The study contributes to enhancing digital efficacy within the higher education sector, informing strategic decisions, and providing valuable insights for university leaders, policymakers, and scholars grappling with the challenges of digital transformation. This research contributes to the existing literature on digital transformation in higher education, particularly within resource-constrained environments. The study provides novel empirical evidence based on data collected from university staff interacting through digital platforms.

Keywords: {'name': 'Organisational Ambidexterity'}, {'name': 'Digital Efficacy'}, {'name': 'Digital Skills'}, {'name': 'Higher Education'}, {'name': 'Zimbabwean State Universities'}

Authors & affiliations

Siphephelo Mpofu
Gwanda State University

Njabulo Ndlovu
National University of Science and Technology

Takawira Ndofirepi
National University of Science and Technology

Paul Nemashakwe
Catholic University of Zimbabwe

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2020.103345

DOI: 10.1108/IJIS-11-2020-0262

DOI: 10.1108/MD-03-2016-0170

DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0406

DOI: 10.1108/MD-12-2016-0895

DOI: 10.1177/014920639101700108

DOI: 10.33516/maj.v55i4.68-72p

DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2018.05.010

DOI: 10.1108/JKM-09-2018-0566

Borase, S., Deshmukh, S., & Pawar, P. (2021). Impact of ERP implementation on organisational performance: A review. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 12(4), 15–22.

Boukamel, O., & Emery, Y. (2017). Evolution of organisational ambidexterity in the public sector and current challenges of innovation capabilities. The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 22, 1–27.

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198288787.001.0001

DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00700

Chanias, S., & Hess, T. (2016). Understanding digital transformation strategy formation: Insights from Europe's automotive industry. In Proceedings of the 20th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2016). Chiayi, Taiwan.

DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2022.3220946

DOI: 10.1108/JKM-10-2019-0555

DOI: 10.55190/RDHC9092

DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.

DOI: 10.2307/259140

Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In R. H. Kilmann, L. R. Pondy, & D. P. Slevin (Eds.), The management of organization design: Strategies and implementation (pp. 167–188). North-Holland.

DOI: 10.2307/258048

DOI: 10.2307/20159573

DOI: 10.1002/9781118763025

DOI: 10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage.

DOI: 10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0094

DOI: 10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624

Heirati, N. (2012). Achieving ambidexterity across multiple organisational levels and functional areas: Synchronising the development and marketing of firms' new and established products [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tasmania].

DOI: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

DOI: 10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0088

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-16598-6

Kane, G., Palmer, D., & Phillips, A. N. (2015). Is your business ready for a digital future? MIT Sloan Management Review, 56, 37–44.

DOI: 10.1504/IJTTC.2016.081635

DOI: 10.1108/IJIS-08-2018-0083

DOI: 10.1177/0020852317735164

DOI: 10.1007/s10796-022-10308-y

DOI: 10.17512/pjms.2021.23.1.18

DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.08.004

Magwa, S., & Magwa, W. (2015). A guide to conducting research: A student handbook. Strategic Book Publishing and Rights Co.

Maphosa, V. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on institutional growth: A case of Zimbabwean universities. In The 9th Annual ACIST Proceedings. Kennesaw State University. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/acist/2023/presentations/17

DOI: 10.21833/ijaas.2022.03.017

DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99707-0_20

DOI: 10.20431/2349-0381.1009013

Ndlovu, N. (2021). The influence of organisational ambidexterity on transformational government in Zimbabwe: Towards a municipal information quality model [Doctoral dissertation, University of Venda].

Ndlovu, N., Ochara, N. M., & Martin, R. (2022). A systematic review of organizational ambidexterity and public value in local government. In 37th IBIMA Conference. Cordoba, Spain.

DOI: 10.1016/j.stae.2022.100020

Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (4th ed.). Open University Press.

DOI: 10.1108/IJQSS-04-2016-0038

DOI: 10.1177/0021886320913048

DOI: 10.1108/MD-01-2017-0086

Ramayah, T., Loon, C. K., & Yin, T. S. (2023). How strategic alliance affects the supply chain performance of Malaysian ocean carriers? Global Business & Management Research, 15(2), 99–120.

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14878

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12834

DOI: 10.2307/41410402

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/873/1/012016

DOI: 10.1007/s11846-023-00659-4

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Sharma, V., Chauhan, P., & Mca, S. (2021). An analysis of enterprise resource planning in the university education system. SSRN Electronic Journal, 8(12), 51–63.

DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2013.849292

DOI: 10.1080/08276331.2012.10593570

DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.12

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.097

DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

DOI: 10.4324/9780429398971-17

DOI: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2023.03.004

DOI: 10.4314/jsasa.v55i.8

DOI: 10.5871/jba/009s1.243