The oxymoron of participatory democracy in the South African maturing democracy: A dialectical paradoxes of public<i> </i>administration
B.K. Sebake
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025 · Vol. 14 / Issue 7 · 454-562
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 22:58 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The maturing democracy in South Africa is navigating challenges within the context of participatory democracy, which has evolved into two distinct states. The arrangement of these two states reflects the citizens' efforts to mobilise for the public state, as opposed to their belief in the private state. The public state is exemplified by active participation aimed at advancing the interests of the impoverished, which should serve as a foundational element to inform the government of its citizens' desires. The second state is the private state (intra-state), which functions in the digital age and communicates swiftly on various matters distinct from those of the public state. All these states appeal to the same government, yet one state appears to be thriving more than the others, complicating the philosophical framework that underlies South Africa's public administration aimed at unifying the nation. This study aims to illustrate the quality of services and the dependencies of these two states on government, highlighting how their existence is scientifically steering the government in divergent directions. Secondly, this illustrates how these two states are influenced by class contradictions within society, where one class oppresses another to promote its interests through government influence. The study concludes that intra-state arrangements are illegitimate, serving to exploit power dynamics over the public state and impacting national interests. A single public state is recommended for establishment.
Keywords: {'name': 'Oxymoron, Participatory Democracy, Non-participatory Democracy, States, Public Administration'}
Authors & affiliations
B.K. Sebake
Central University of Technology
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.18196/jphk.v4i1.14406
Asenahabi, B. M. (2019). Basics of research design: A guide to selecting appropriate research design. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Researches, 6(5), 76–89.
DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2021.1928187
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-26983-8_3
Enaifoghe, A. (2023). The Role of Ethical Behavior and Public Value Creation in the Local Government System in South Africa. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 6(1), 471–483.
DOI: 10.1093/geront/gny037
DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181
DOI: 10.1177/00323217211043433
DOI: 10.2307/3235441
DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.03.010
DOI: 10.1177/20539517231160528
DOI: 10.25159/2663-6549/12602
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102270
DOI: 10.1111/eulj.12156
DOI: 10.1108/JKM-06-2017-0232
DOI: 10.1111/gove.12502
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_49
Mabeba, S. J. (2021). The impact of corruption on service delivery: a topical matter in the South African Municipalities. The Business and Management Review, 165.
DOI: 10.1086/709495
Maela, K. D., & Selepe, M. (2023). The Nuts and Bolts of Public Participation and Good Governance in South Africa: A Critical Review. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 6(10), 238–251.
DOI: 10.1111/soc4.13004
DOI: 10.1002/pa.1935
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-10576-0_3
DOI: 10.1177/0261018320906776
DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwy051
DOI: 10.17159/2223-0386/2023/n29a6
DOI: 10.1086/679597
Ndlovu, S. M. (2017). The anatomy of the crowd. In South African Democracy Education Trust (eds.), In Road to Democracy in South Africa (Vol. 7, pp. 44–78). Unisa Press.
Nengwekhulu, R. H. (2009). Public service delivery challenges facing the South African public service. Journal of public administration, 44(2), 341–363.
DOI: 10.20952/revtee.v14i33.15614
DOI: 10.1080/00344893.2020.1823461
DOI: 10.1353/jod.2020.0000
DOI: 10.4324/9781315251196-15
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-86410-1_6
DOI: 10.1177/0020852318759736
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.082
Ruhiiga, T. M. (2009). Costing the impact of corruption on service delivery in South Africa: An exploratory overview. Journal of Public Administration, 44(4), 1090–1101.
DOI: 10.1177/03043754231174757
DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2023.2228710
Sebake, B. K. (2017). Neoliberalism in the South African post-apartheid regime: Economic policy positions and globalisation impact. International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternatives (IPADA).
DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i10.3099
DOI: 10.55190/JPADA.2024.304
DOI: 10.31920/2516-3132/2023/v7n1a6
Sebake, B. K., & Sebola, M. P. (2014). Growing trends and tendencies of corruption in the South African public service: Negative contribution to service delivery. Journal of public administration, 49(3), 744–755.
Sebola, M. P., & Tsheola, J. P. (2020). Philosophical dialectics and systematic absoluteness of self-criticism: editorial framing. Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives (JPADA), 5(1), i–xiii.
Sebola, M. P., & Tsheola, J. P. (2023). Are Democracies Preserves of Governance? Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives (JPADA), 8(2), i–iv.
DOI: 10.17159/2221-4070/2023/v12i2a8
DOI: 10.1080/18146627.2017.1358066
DOI: 10.1002/2017RG000574
DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i10.3096
DOI: 10.1108/01443570911006018
DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i10.3121
DOI: 10.9770/IRD.2023.5.4(2)
DOI: 10.1007/s10796-020-10096-3
DOI: 10.30651/justitia.v7i1.17565
DOI: 10.17159/2224-7912/2024/v64n3a2
DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2020.1828049
DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00566.1
DOI: 10.4324/9781315037479-6
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.07.090