Educational technology for equity in South Africa: Promise and challenge

Abstract

Despite extensive research on the impact of educational technology in enhancing the quality of teaching, learning, and learner academic achievement, there remains a notable lack of research focusing on teachers’ perspectives regarding the role of technology in addressing educational inequities. Using South Africa as a case study, this qualitative investigation sought to explore South African teachers’ views on the perceived role of educational technology in promoting educational equity. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with four purposefully selected teachers from public schools in South Africa. The thematic findings indicated that the participants believed educational technology holds the potential to significantly contribute to the redress of educational inequities by expanding access to information and resources, improving the quality and efficiency of education, and catering to diverse learner preferences. However, participants also expressed concern that technology could potentially worsen existing disparities rooted in socioeconomic status. They emphasized the importance of equitable access to technological infrastructure. This study provides insights into the complex relationship between educational technology and equity within the South African context and underscores the importance of incorporating teachers’ perspectives in the implementation of technology-driven initiatives intended to eliminate educational inequalities.

Keywords: {'name': 'Education in South Africa'}, {'name': 'Educational Equity'}, {'name': 'Educational technology'}, {'name': 'Technology intergration'}, {'name': 'Teaching and Learning'}

Authors & affiliations

Wellington Itai Manzi
Central University of Technology

Motalenyane Alfred Modise
Central University of Technology

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.51594/ijmer.v6i5.1091

DOI: 10.1177/21582440231154417

DOI: 10.52589/BJCE-S8GBY9M3

Arifin, S., & Darmawan, D. (2021). Technology access and digital skills: Bridging the gaps in education and employment opportunities in the age of technology 4.0. Journal of Social Science Studies, 1(1), 163–168. https://jos3journals.id/index.php/jos3/article/view/48

Azhar, K. A., & Iqbal, N. (2018). Effectiveness of Google Classroom: Teachers' perceptions. Prizren Social Science Journal, 2, 52–66.

DOI: 10.24250/jpe/SI/2023/MBH/

DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2017.1421153

DOI: 10.21100/compass.v11i2.837

Beaunoyer, E., Dupèrè, S., & Guitton, M. J. (2020). Internet use and self-reported health problems: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behaviour, 107, 106279.

Blackmont, S. (2017). The stream's the thing: Google classroom and graduate education. Retrieved from http://er.educause.ed/articles/2017/8the-streams-the-thinf-google-classroom-and-graduate-education

DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192894199.013.31

DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.13115

DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1539763

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). SAGE.

Cresswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.

DOI: 10.1177/15586898241253892

Cresswell, H. (2024). A qualitative phenomenological study examining the experiences of substance use disorder clients engaging in adventure therapy.

DOI: 10.3390/educsci14010010

David, A., Guilbert, N., Hamaguchi, N., Higashi, Y., Hino, H., Leibbrandt, M., & Shifa, M. (2018). Spatial poverty and inequality in South Africa: A municipality level analysis. SALDRU, UCT. (SALDRU Working Paper Number 221).

DOI: 10.2307/249008

DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12808

DOI: 10.7748/nr2013.05.20.5.28.e327

DOI: 10.1080/09645292.2021.1920000

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102211

DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12788

DOI: 10.70725/777910ngamnp

Giroux, H. A. (2011). On critical pedagogy. Continuum Kenya.

DOI: 10.29333/iji.2020.13251a

DOI: 10.70725/583781fusvis

DOI: 10.1007/s41297-022-00160-0

DOI: 10.15215/aupress/9781778290015.009

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012013

Harjanto, A. S., & Sumarni, S. (2019). Teachers' experiences on the use of Google Classroom. In 3rd English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings.

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-6643-7

DOI: 10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.34022

DOI: 10.24042/tadris.v6i1.7288

DOI: 10.5430/ijhe.v9n7p176

DOI: 10.22214/ijraset.2023.57028

Lohse, J. C., & Valdez, F. (2004). Ancient Maya commoners. University of Texas Press.

DOI: 10.1002/hbe2.140

DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-2917-7.ch002

DOI: 10.20448/jeelr.v11i1.5396

Maree, K. (2007). First steps in research. Van Schaik Publishers.

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2024.809032

Panergayo, A. A., & Aliazas, J. V. (2023). Google classroom adoption as learning management system in senior high school using technology acceptance model. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 13(2), 871–883. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4533623

DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532

DOI: 10.4236/jilsa.2023.154009

Rule, P., & John, V. (2011). Your guide to case study research. Van Schaik Publishers.

Stommel, J. (2014). Critical pedagogy: A definition. Hybrid Pedagogy. Retrieved from http://www.digitalpedagogylab.com/hybridped/critical-digital-pedagogy-definition/

Taherdoost, H. (2021). How to conduct an effective interview: A guide to interview design in research study. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 11(1), 39–51.

Tyolani, M., & Paul, L. (2024). Empowering education through technology: Enhancing quality and relevance in South Africa's democratic era. Researchers World, 15(2), 92–102.

Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017). Digital divide: The internet and social inequality in international perspective. Sage Publications.

DOI: 10.11648/j.edu.20241305.15

DOI: 10.1007/s40692-023-00304-9

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.