The psychosocial impact of sexual victimisation amongst female students: The case of South African rural and urban universities
John Lekganyane ORCID ↗ · Witness Maluleke
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025 · Vol. 14 / Issue 8 · 324-332
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:28 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This qualitative study examines the psychosocial barriers that prevent female students from reporting sexual victimisation at selected rural and urban universities in South Africa, as well as other Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). This study aimed to examine the psychological effects and social repercussions experienced by students, including instances of sexual abuse. This study is grounded in the Lifestyle Exposure Theory by Hindelang et al. (1978) and Fattah’s (1991) Differential Risk Model. It employed semi-structured In-Depth Interviews (IDIs) with twenty-nine (29) First Responders, specifically selected from the Gender Desk, Student Governance, Health and Wellness, residence administrators, academic staff, safety and security, legal, psychology, and social work domains. These participants were chosen to provide insights on the subject matter. The findings indicate that fear of retaliation, stigmatisation, institutional distrust, and emotional trauma together perpetuate a culture of silence. The research emphasises that these barriers intensify psychological distress and social isolation in victims, thereby contributing to underreporting. The findings underscore the insufficient response to the necessity for a multi-institutional strategy to: 1) Implement trauma-informed awareness campaigns aimed at destigmatization, 2) Enhance structural support systems to bolster accountability, and 3) Ensure comprehensive staff training to eradicate biases in case management. By prioritising the welfare of survivors and confronting the societal acceptability of sexual violence, universities can mitigate the psychosocial effects of victimisation. This paper proposes the development of policies that rectify the gaps between institutional commitments and the real experiences of students, with the goal of establishing active prevention and survivor-centered justice as standard practices on campus.
Keywords: {'name': 'Case study, Female students, Psychosocial impact, Reporting barriers, Sexual victimisation, South African rural and urban universities'}
Authors & affiliations
John Lekganyane
University of Limpopo
Witness Maluleke
University of Limpopo
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01445-8
Asenahabi, B. M. (2019). Basics of research design: A guide to selecting appropriate research design. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Researches, 6(5), 76–89.
DOI: 10.1177/0886260515586373
DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2018.1517206
DOI: 10.1177/08862605211005148
DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1757681
DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cantor, D., Fisher, B., Chibnall, S., Harps, S., Townsend, R., Thomas, G., Lee, H., Kranz, V., Herbison, R., & Madden, K. (2019). Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and misconduct: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Westat. Retrieved June 14, 2023, from https://safe.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1110/2020/06/University-of-North-Carolina-at-Chapel-Hill_Report-and-Appendices-.pdf
DOI: 10.1177/08862605231155122
DOI: 10.1177/0886260519849680
DOI: 10.1037/vio0000104
DOI: 10.4324/9781003362715-8
Griffin, B. C. P. (2023). An exploration of institutional betrayal following gender-based violence among college students [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
DOI: 10.1177/0361684313482873
DOI: 10.1177/0886260514553116
DOI: 10.1177/1524838019881731
DOI: 10.1177/1524838014521500
Lorenz, K., & Kirkner, A. (2018). Silent no more: Victim empowerment through university reporting. Palgrave Macmillan.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260886
DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1998574
DOI: 10.1007/s43545-023-00611-z
DOI: 10.1353/csd.2011.0002
DOI: 10.1177/0886260516632357
DOI: 10.1177/1524838018756121
DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1146651
DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2021.1892402
DOI: 10.1177/1524838018789153
Rice, L. K. (2024). Institutional betrayal and its implications on college sexual assault survivors' coping styles and psychological wellbeing [Doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University].
DOI: 10.1177/17488958231202011
DOI: 10.4135/9781526416070.n15
DOI: 10.1177/1524838014521322
DOI: 10.3200/JACH.55.3.157-162
DOI: 10.1037/tra0001300
DOI: 10.1177/15248380211036058
World Health Organization. (2019). Violence against women: Intimate partner and sexual violence against women.