Investigating the concept of volatility spillover: Evidence in international financial markets

Abstract

Prior research on volatility spillover indicates that financial market spillovers are not uniform across all markets. Their intensity and direction depend on factors such as market size, economic linkages, and the nature of the shock. The aim of this study was to comprehensive investigation of volatility spillovers across five major international equity markets from January 2008 to January 2024, a period encompassing multiple financial crises. Utilizing a conditional volatility model, followed by the construction of a spillover index and Granger causality tests to investigate the direction and magnitude of volatility transmission, the findings of this study revealed that the S&P 500 is a net receiver of volatility, acting as a global shock absorber rather than a primary transmitter. In contrast, European markets and the Nikkei 225 emerged as net transmitters, with a tightly coupled, bidirectional relationship observed between the United Kingdom and European markets. The Shanghai Composite was also found to be nearly neutral, likely due to capital controls. These results reiterated the notion that volatility transmission networks are dynamic and not solely dictated by market size. The findings of this study suggest that asset managers and other investors can significantly increase the value of their portfolios if they adopt a multi-polar risk management framework, moving beyond a United States centric view for international diversification to include more European and Asian markets assets in their portfolios.

Authors & affiliations

Samuel Tabot Enow
Research Associate, The IIE VEGA School

Lailah Imandin
Deputy Dean – Research, The IIE Vega School Durban

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Bouri, E., Gkillas, K., & Gupta, R. (2023). Geopolitical risks and volatility spillovers across commodity and financial markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 84, 101745.

Bouri, E., Lau, C. K. M., Lucey, B., & Roubaud, D. (2024). Volatility spillovers between leading cryptocurrencies and traditional financial assets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 90, 101925.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02208.x

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.006

DOI: 10.31559/GJEB2023.13.1.5

Gopal, M., Sahu, S., & Dash, S. R. (2025). Commodity market volatility in the wake of geopolitical strife: Evidence from the Russia-Ukraine war. Energy Economics, 128, 107512.

Haddad, M. (2023). The double-edged sword of financial globalization. Journal of Financial Stability, 66, 101–120.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.07.012

Kakran, S., Chan, F., & Khan, S. (2023). A survey of volatility spillover measures in financial markets. Journal of Economic Surveys, 37(3), 874–907.

Mishra, A. K., Agrawal, S., & Patwa, J. A. (2022). Return and volatility spillover between Indian and global equity markets: A dynamic conditional correlation approach. Journal of Asian Economics, 81, 101496.

Nagy, S., Márkus, B., & Szokol, A. (2024). The S&P 500 as a global volatility sink. Finance Research Letters, 59, 104–123.

Renata, K., & Szczepan, M. (2025). Cross-market financial integration and volatility transmission in post-Brexit Europe. European Financial Management, 31(1), 45–67.

Sahoo, P., & Kumar, R. (2024). Sectoral vulnerability to global volatility shocks: Evidence from financial, technology, and energy sectors. International Review of Economics & Finance, 89, 1234–1252.