CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJRBSPUBLICATION RECORD

Barriers to uptake of treatment for geophagic women of reproductive age in Tshwane district, Gauteng province: A qualitative study using the health belief model

Mohora Feida Malebatja · Mathildah Mpata Mokgatle · Oluwafemi Omoniyi Oguntibeju

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025 · Vol. 14 / Issue 8 · 333-343

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS0

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations0Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC

Mendeley · Readers0Cached provider observation

Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:38 UTC

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

Geophagic practise amongst women of reproductive age remains a major public health concern that is associated with perinatal and postpartum mortalities and morbidities that requires critical interventions to mitigate the practise. Despite the available interventions such as administration of oral iron and folic acid supplementation and intravenous iron therapy, geophagic women of reproductive age do not adhere to the prescribed treatment. Geophagic practise is mostly common and prevalent amongst women of reproductive age worldwide, irrespective of their socio-economic status, ethnicity, age, and social status. An exploratory qualitative research method was used to conduct the study to explore the perceived barriers to accessing treatment for geophagy among women of reproductive age in Tshwane District, Gauteng Province, using the Health Belief Model as a theoretical framework. The study was conducted in the antenatal care and family planning units in the public healthcare facilities of Tshwane District, Gauteng Province. The findings indicate that absence of geophagy health education and screening of iron deficiency in the antenatal care units, as part of the antenatal care. addiction, dependency syndrome, influence from peers, fear of judgement and shame to disclose to healthcare providers about their geophagic practise status, lack of awareness regarding the benefits of taking oral and intravenous iron therapies were stressed as the main barriers influencing the uptake of treatment for geophagy amongst women of reproductive age. The implementation of iron and folic acid supplementation and intravenous iron therapy for geophagic women of reproductive age is not adequately yielding positive results if this initiative is not coupled with geophagy health education particularly in the antenatal care units to enhance treatment uptake and adherence.

Keywords: {'name': 'Geophagy, folic acid and iron supplements, health education and promotion, interventions, women of reproductive age, Tshwane District.'}

Authors & affiliations

Mohora Feida Malebatja
Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University

Mathildah Mpata Mokgatle
Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University

Oluwafemi Omoniyi Oguntibeju
Cape Peninsula University of Technology

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1017/S1368980021001737

DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-06169-1

DOI: 10.4082/kjfm.23.0100

DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.893831

DOI: 10.1188/14.ONF.89-91

DOI: 10.1007/s40519-018-0624-9

DOI: 10.1016/j.cegh.2022.101133

DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37904

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227090

DOI: 10.4103/2008-7802.157678

DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxab024

DOI: 10.2471/BLT.20.280180

Huda, T. M., Dibley, M., Tahsina, T., Rahman, M. M., Raihana, S., Islam, S., Alam, A., Agho, K. E., Kelly, P., & Rasheed, S. (n.d.). Effect of early use of maternal iron and folic acid supplements on neonatal survival: A community-based cluster randomised controlled trial in rural Bangladesh (Shonjibon Trial).

DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0579

DOI: 10.4103/rcm.rcm_8_22

DOI: 10.1080/19371918.2020.1791778

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227351

DOI: 10.29392/001c.74955

DOI: 10.1002/nop2.451

DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-02857-4

DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08024-w

DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_721_20

DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.00020

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100431

DOI: 10.1007/s10653-025-02656-w

Malepe, R. E. (2022). Geophagic materials and their potential impacts on human health in South Africa: A case study from Fetakgomo Tubatse Local Municipality (FTLM) area in Limpopo Province [University of Johannesburg]. https://hdl.handle.net/10210/502183

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06497

DOI: 10.1093/tropej/fmaa009

DOI: 10.36303/JMLSTSA.2020.2.1.38

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-41268-4_17

DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063615

Norman, I. D., Binka, F. N., & Godi, A. H. (2023). Geophagia: A cultural-nutrition health-seeking behaviour with no redeeming psycho-social qualities. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.12908/SEEJPH2014-38

DOI: 10.1177/1609406917733847

DOI: 10.25182/jgp.2023.18.3.187-196

Organization, W. H. (2024). Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/375767/9789240077263-eng.pdf?sequence=1

DOI: 10.1007/s10653-020-00632-0

DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1937980

DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_994_20

DOI: 10.1177/03795721231179570

DOI: 10.1007/s11910-022-01218-2

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-14616-6

DOI: 10.46439/addiction.1.006

DOI: 10.1017/S1368980020001007

DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S291939