Challenges in learning economics and management sciences: A study of third-year students at a University of Technology

Abstract

This empirical paper examines the challenges third-year students face in learning Economic and Management Sciences (EMS) at a University of Technology. The primary issue is that students frequently struggle to grasp the subject effectively, resulting in unsatisfactory outcomes. The paper is rooted in Constructivist Learning Theory, pioneered by Vygotsky and Piaget, which posits that students develop their understanding through active engagement and social interaction. Participatory Action Research was employed as the primary method for data collection, and a thematic approach was used for data analysis. A WhatsApp group was created to facilitate group discussions for data collection and analysis. Participants included nine (n=9) third-year students specialising in EMS as one of their elective subjects. The study found that inadequate mentorship and support significantly affect the effectiveness of learning EMS. The complexity of EMS, a lack of accounting background, and the workload were identified as key challenges hindering effective learning. Based on these findings, the study recommends that students, particularly those without a strong foundation in accounting from high school, receive adequate support. Additionally, it advocates that each course should be treated independently rather than combining multiple subjects under EMS. Based on these findings, the study aims to contribute to the enhancement of EMS teaching and to propose strategies for addressing the frustrations experienced by third-year students within the module.

Authors & affiliations

Matsolo Claurina Mokhampanyane
Central University of Technology

Motalenyane Modise
Central University of Technology

Nosihle Veronica Sithole
Central University of Technology

Anele May
Central University of Technology

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Bosua, W. S. (2015). The effect of prior knowledge and academic performance on success in first-year university accounting. Journal for New Generation Sciences, 13(3), 17–33.

DOI: 10.1080/713695728

British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research.

DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13943-x

DOI: 10.1177/1744987120927206

DOI: 10.20853/35-1-4420

DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13426

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.

Crisp, G., & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: A review of the literature. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(4), 484–502.

DOI: 10.1370/afm.2453

DOI: 10.38159/ehass.20256610

Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. Instructional Design Theories and Models, 2, 215–240.

DOI: 10.26803/ijlter.21.9.7

Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. (2011). Disciplinary differences in students' approaches to learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(2), 161–171.

DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n20p1521

Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2006). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. Jossey-Bass.

Kusuma, A. E., Suryani, E., & Sumaryati, S. (2022). Mobile application-based media learning and its effect on students' learning motivation. International Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation (IJERE), 6(4), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v6i4.22481

DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02095-4

DOI: 10.19030/iber.v12i4.7742

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1095869

DOI: 10.1177/0972063414526124

DOI: 10.1109/IMITEC45504.2019.9015903

Mafereka, M., & Mupinga, D. M. (2020). Exploring the role of education 5.0 in South African higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(10), 1–10.

DOI: 10.17159/2520-9868/i97a08

DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511816819

Misra, R., & McKean, M. (2000). College students' academic stress and its relation to their anxiety, time management, and leisure satisfaction. American Journal of Health Studies, 16(1), 41–51.

DOI: 10.1080/09751122.2016.11890464

DOI: 10.38140/ijer-2025.vol7.s1.13

DOI: 10.46303/ressat.2023.42

Mphahlele, K. M. (2019). Using digital equity as a framework to explore the influence of COVID-19 on students' access and participation in online learning in South Africa. Journal of Learning for Development, 6(3), 215–229.

Nzuza, S., Ngwenya, J. C., & Ndovela, S. (2022). Teachers' experiences of teaching financial literacy in Economic and Management Sciences (EMS) in preparing learners for FET phase accounting. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(11), 357–373.

DOI: 10.1007/s10648-011-9179-2

DOI: 10.1037/11494-000

DOI: 10.1037/11168-000

DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-8040-3_17

DOI: 10.7748/nr.2018.e1466

Smith, J., & Williams, R. (2021). Academic workload and its impact on third-year management students in European universities. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(5), 1020–1035.

DOI: 10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7

Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B., & Stuckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Yardley-Matwiejczuk, K. M. (2008). Clinical problem solving in medical education. Wiley.

Zhou, M., Brown, D., & Rivas, M. (2019). Educational learning theories (2nd ed.). Education Open Textbooks.