Modelling financial time series with threshold nonlinearity
Samuel Tabot Enow
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025 · Vol. 14 / Issue 8 · 152-156
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 02:26 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Financial markets are a system of complex price dynamics that are often influenced by various nonlinear factors. Traditional linear models such as Autoregressive Moving Average also known as ARMA and the GARCH model often fail to capture the inherent nonlinearities observed in financial market returns and trading volumes which poses significant problems in modelling financial time series. The aim of this study was to investigates the role of threshold nonlinearity in modelling financial market returns and trading volume. Daily share prices and trading volumes from the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq indices spanning from January 2000 to December 2020 were used as the sample financial markets. The findings revealed that the threshold model improves predictive performance over traditional linear models, highlighting the importance of incorporating nonlinearity for understanding the dynamics of financial markets. A threshold autoregressive model was proposed to account for sudden shifts in market conditions and nonlinear dependencies between returns and trading volumes.
Keywords: {'name': 'Threshold Nonlinearity, Returns, Trading Volume, Nonlinear Models, TAR Model'}
Authors & affiliations
Samuel Tabot Enow
Research Associate, The IIE VEGA School
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbrev.2018.11.002
DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2024.13
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-022-01605-4
DOI: 10.2307/2527343
DOI: 10.3390/jrfm16030187
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00661.x
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.09.005
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-013-9330-8
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00073-2
Elder, J., Kim, M., & Clements, A. (2002). Threshold autoregressive models and the nonlinearity of financial time series. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 6(3), 345–368.
DOI: 10.1198/073500104000000370
DOI: 10.47743/jopafl-2023-27-09
Enow, S. T. (2023). Exploring volatility clustering in financial markets and its implication. Journal of Economic & Social Development, 10(2), 81–85.
Fenton, N. E., & Godfrey, S. (2008). Risk assessment: Theory, methods, and applications. Wiley-Interscience.
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/5.2.199
Gómez, V., & Velasco, C. (2013). A comparison of threshold autoregressive models for volatility prediction. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 34(1), 94–116.
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198773191.001.0001
Hasbrouck, J., & Saar, G. (2009). Limit orders and liquidity on the NASDAQ market. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44(3), 553–578.
DOI: 10.1002/cpz1.801
Kaas, R., Goovaerts, M., Dhaene, J., & Denuit, M. (2000). Exponential claims reserving using the chain-ladder method. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, 30(2), 143–167.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.044
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0262.00071
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1994.10476462
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-7888-4
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1998.10473779
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110371