Strategies for financially sustainable energy efficiency projects in low-income communities: An examination of the sustainable chameleon approach
Thembinkosi Maphosa ORCID ↗ · Abdullah Bayat ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025 · Vol. 14 / Issue 8 · 260-269
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This paper examines the financial sustainability problems encountered by the Kuyasa Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) project, which renovated 2,309 low-income residences with solar water heaters, compact fluorescent lighting, and insulated ceilings. Notwithstanding its environmental and social advantages, the project encountered considerable financial deficits, especially in maintenance funding, attributed to decreasing Certified Emission Reduction (CER) values and delays in payout. A concurrent triangulation mixed-methods approach was utilised. Quantitative data were gathered from 370 people of Kuyasa using structured questionnaires, while qualitative insights were acquired through semi-structured interviews with 20 specialists in the energy sector. The analysis was based on the "Integrated Participatory Sustainable Framework," which integrates systems theory, sustainability theory, community empowerment, and energy availability. The findings indicated that the project's financial unsustainability stemmed from constraints in the revenue stream, contribution channels, loan repayment strategies, and community empowerment initiatives, culminating in a negative Net Present Value (NPV). The paper introduces the "Sustainable Chameleon Strategy to Overcome Challenges," which figuratively utilises ten adaptive traits of the chameleon to guide context-specific, sustainable financial processes. The study presents a replicable framework for renewable energy initiatives, proposing techniques to enhance financial viability via innovative design, stakeholder engagement, and adaptable finance mechanisms beyond the CDM. This study presents the innovative "Sustainable Chameleon Strategy to Overcome Financial Sustainability Challenges," which provides a creative and integrative method for addressing financial sustainability issues in community-based renewable energy initiatives, particularly in low-income and developing nations.
Keywords: {'name': 'community development'}, {'name': 'financial sustainability'}, {'name': 'Kuyasa clean development mechanism'}, {'name': 'low-income communities'}, {'name': 'renewable energy efficiency'}, {'name': 'sustainable chameleon strategy'}
Authors & affiliations
Thembinkosi Maphosa
University of the Western Cape
Abdullah Bayat
University of the Western Cape
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-4171-9_6
DOI: 10.1109/ICAIIC64266.2025.10920672
DOI: 10.3390/su13042128
Arifuddin, R., Suraji, A., & Latief, Y. (2019). Study of the causal factors of construction projects' vulnerability to accidents. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(6), 711–716.
DOI: 10.30574/gscarr.2024.21.2.0454
DOI: 10.1007/s10272-022-1023-z
Bruce, P. (2018). Steps to sustainability: A brief history of sustainability. Retrieved May 25, 2018, from https://steps2sustainability.wordpress.com/tag/peter-bruce/
Chen, J., Li, K., Yang, S., Dewi, C., Progo, S. N. K., & Elsye, V. (2019). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101871
Culver, L. C. (2017). Energy poverty: What you measure matters. Pre-symposium white paper for Reducing Energy Poverty with Natural Gas: Changing Political, Business, and Technology Paradigms, Stanford University, CA, May 9–10, 2017.
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/83/1/012012
DOI: 10.4236/tel.2020.106078
Goldman, M. (2010). Kuyasa CDM project: Renewable energy-efficient technology for the poor. United Nations Development Programme: Cape Town. Retrieved February 22, 2020, from https://silo.tips/download/kuyasa-CDM-project-renewable-energy-efficient-technology-for-the-poor
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110406
Kerzner, H. (2025). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
DOI: 10.1108/JMD-02-2019-0045
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109480
Maphosa, T. (2024). The financial sustainability challenges of an energy efficient intervention project in a low-income earning urban community: Lessons from the Kuyasa clean development mechanism (CDM) (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Western Cape).
Maphosa, T., & Bayat, A. (2024). Lessons learnt from a review of the Kuyasa project nine years post-implementation. Management, Business, Administration and Legal, 320.
DOI: 10.14426/jei.v1i1.572
DOI: 10.35564/jmbe.2022.0001
Mhizha, A. (2014). Application of the ‘Chameleon Survival Strategy Model’ in the study of strategic management in small and medium-scale enterprises. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 3(6), 216–225.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-80165-6_8
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109525
Ntuli, N. P. (2012). Barriers and opportunities for implementation of clean development mechanism in South Africa: A case study of Gauteng municipalities (Master’s thesis). University of Johannesburg.
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16710
DOI: 10.1111/joms.12549
DOI: 10.1007/BF00896357
DOI: 10.1002/ar.25621
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102027
Sykes, J. (2022). Energy efficiency in the low-income homes of South Africa. Climate Strategies.
DOI: 10.1088/2634-4505/adb0eb
Walsh, V., Wesselink, C., & Janisch, A. (2011). PDI: Improving urban living conditions in Kuyasa (Cape Town) through energy-efficiency retrofits: The impact on low-income communities (38 pp.). London: Government Office for Science, UK. Retrieved March 20, 2025, from https://carbonn.org/uploads/tx_carbonndata/11-1141-pd1-improving-living-conditions-in-kuyasa-cape-town.pdf
Wlokas, H. L., & Ellis, C. (2013). Local employment through the low-pressure solar water heater roll-out in South Africa. ERC Research Report Series. Cape Town: Energy Research Centre, University of Cape Town. Retrieved March 20, 2025, from http://www.erc.uct.ac.za/sites/default/files/image_tool/images/119/Papers-2013/13-Wlokas-ellis_Employment_through_SWH_rollout.pdf