Disclosure determinants in corporate reporting: Testing the significance of financial and pension variables
Ulla Bauer ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026 · Vol. 14 / Issue 10 · 174-183
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:40 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of financial and pension factors, including funding ratios, pension accounting modifications, and anticipated future cash flows, on disclosure practices in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Although previous studies have provided significant insights into the correlation among pension variables, corporate attributes, and disclosure levels, empirical information in IFRS jurisdictions is still few. To rectify this deficiency, we examine the factors influencing key actuarial estimate (CAE) disclosures and the actual variations in discount rates and anticipated asset returns, utilising panel data from 173 German companies (DAX, MDAX, SDAX), encompassing 1,057 and 1,352 firm-year observations, respectively. Employing the deferred remuneration theory as a framework, the findings reveal that greater firm size and regulatory status enhance the sensitivity of discount rates and anticipated returns, whereas extensive litigation disclosures diminish both. Profitability is positively correlated with sensitivity, whereas a weaker financed status exerts a mitigating influence. The correlations are most robust and consistent among DAX and MDAX companies, but less so among SDAX companies. The model exhibits a high overall fit, with R² values between 0.38 and 0.72. The results indicate that management of larger, regulated enterprises must be particularly vigilant about the formulation and dissemination of pension-related assumptions, as disclosure decisions can significantly affect market reactions. This study enhances comprehension of the factors and implications of pension assumption disclosures by presenting comparative evidence from significant German indices, thereby proposing practical recommendations for company policy and regulatory supervision. This work theoretically expands the deferred remuneration theory (DRT) by illustrating that the intensity and orientation of compensation–disclosure interactions differ systematically based on firm size, governance structure, and financial attributes. This indicates that the amount and direction of the relationship between remuneration and disclosure are not consistent, contrary to DRT's assumption. Instead, they exhibit consistent variation based on firm size, governance frameworks, and critical financial performance metrics.
Keywords: {'name': 'Corporate Disclosure, Pension Accounting, IFRS, Actuarial Assumptions, Financial Determinants, German Capital Market'}
Authors & affiliations
Ulla Bauer
Cardiff Metropolitan University
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.51594/farj.v6i2.786
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2864447
DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.2721
DOI: 10.30574/ijsra.2025.15.1.1100
DOI: 10.1108/S1569-375920200000102007
DOI: 10.1017/S1474747220000050
DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2022.2079757
DOI: 10.2469/faj.v49.n1.18
DOI: 10.1108/JFC-07-2019-0098
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2018.3251
Bauer, U. (2025). A critical analysis of pension disclosures by German listed companies (Doctoral dissertation, Cardiff Metropolitan University).
DOI: 10.1920/re.ifs.2025.0014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-35057-3
DOI: 10.1177/00076503221115715
DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2023.2227468
DOI: 10.17549/gbfr.2024.29.5.72
DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2022.2113757
DOI: 10.2308/JIAR-2021-062
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4215
DOI: 10.1108/MAJ-05-2023-3912
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-74089-3_10
DOI: 10.1017/S1474747224000064
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20231246
Gray, R. H. (1987). Corporate social reporting: Accounting and accountability. Prentice Hall.
DOI: 10.1108/09513579510146996
DOI: 10.1111/acfi.12968
DOI: 10.1057/s41310-024-00270-3
DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-06-2019-0095
DOI: 10.1108/JFRA-10-2020-0305
DOI: 10.57125/FEL.2025.06.25.03
DOI: 10.1111/acfi.13375
DOI: 10.1108/ARJ-07-2021-0209
DOI: 10.1177/0308518X221084995
DOI: 10.1108/ARJ-02-2018-0041
DOI: 10.3390/su11174568
DOI: 10.1007/s11142-021-09633-5
DOI: 10.1017/9781009019965
DOI: 10.1017/9781108781138
DOI: 10.20473/ijss.v14i2.33926
DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-5360-8.ch001
DOI: 10.1108/CCSM-04-2019-0088
DOI: 10.1002/bse.4002
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-35009-2_17
DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2024.2365378
DOI: 10.1177/04866134221119258
DOI: 10.1111/corg.12454
DOI: 10.1108/JFRA-04-2021-0110