The Madlanga commission through the lens of South Africa’s constitutional mandate of oversight

Abstract

The Madlanga Commission represents an important but understudied moment in South Africa’s evolving system of constitutional oversight. Established to investigate allegations of administrative irregularities, governance failures, and breaches of ethical conduct, the Commission provides rich insights into the persistent challenges confronting public sector accountability. This conceptual article critically examines the Madlanga Commission through the lens of South Africa’s constitutional mandate of oversight, drawing specifically on Sections 41, 55, 92, 195 and 195(1)(f), as well as broader principles of democratic governance and administrative justice. Using a qualitative, desktop-based analytical approach, the article synthesises publicly available evidence and applies thematic governance frameworks—including Accountability Theory, Democratic Oversight Theory, and the Constitutionalism Model—to assess the Commission’s findings and implications. The analysis demonstrates that the Commission exposed deep structural weaknesses in the public service, including blurred lines of authority, weak compliance cultures, politicised administration, and fragmented accountability mechanisms. The article argues that the lessons emerging from the Commission remain crucial for enhancing the integrity, transparency, and responsiveness of public sector institutions in South Africa. It concludes by outlining a set of strategic governance reforms, including strengthened oversight bodies, clearer reporting lines, enhanced ethical leadership, and improved implementation monitoring. The study contributes to scholarly debates on oversight effectiveness in emerging democracies and offers practical recommendations for policymakers tasked with strengthening constitutional governance.

Authors & affiliations

Phillip Vuma
STADIO

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1111/puar.13249

DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

Chipkin, I. (2021). State capture and institutional decay: Understanding the Zondo findings. Public Affairs Research Institute.

DOI: 10.18772/22018062125

Commissions Act, No. 8 of 1947.

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, No. 108 of 1996.

Cooper, T. L. (2006). The responsible administrator: An approach to ethics for the administrative role. Jossey-Bass.

Denhardt, R. B., Denhardt, J. V., & Blanc, T. A. (2016). Public administration: An action orientation (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Fombad, C. M. (2014). Enhancing accountability through separation of powers: The African context. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, 47(2), 177–204.

Forensic Watch. (2022). Lessons from the Zondo Commission: Systemic failures in public procurement. Governance Briefing Paper, 23(1), 1–14.

Galanter, M. (2019). Commissions of inquiry and democratic accountability. Journal of Public Inquiry, 12(2), 44–59.

Hoexter, C. (2021). Administrative law in South Africa (3rd ed.). Juta.

Hughes, O. (2018). Public management and administration: An introduction (6th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

DOI: 10.1017/S0022278X20000415

Madonsela, T. (2016). Strengthening constitutional democracy in South Africa: The role of Chapter 9 institutions. South African Journal on Human Rights, 32(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2016.1165176

DOI: 10.1086/226550

Niemann, L. (2022). Ethical reasoning and decision-making in the public sector. Public Integrity, 24(4), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2021.1967896

DOI: 10.1353/jod.1998.0051

OECD. (2018). Government at a glance: Public sector integrity. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264298735-en

Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, No. 3 of 2000.

Salter, L. (2020). Commissions of inquiry: Limitations and contributions. Accountability in Public Service Review, 14(3), 55–72.

DOI: 10.1515/9781685854133

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations Publishing. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda