Harnessing survey insights from mentoring and tutorship (MenTut) student support programme to advance student well-being and academic success

Abstract

In an era where data-driven approaches are increasingly shaping decision-making in higher education, a notable gap remains in the use of survey methodologies specifically designed to inform and enhance student support initiatives. Despite the growing emphasis on evidence-based practices, few studies have systematically utilized survey data to inform institutional strategies and enhance student outcomes. This survey paper employs the Theory of Student Involvement and Appreciative Inquiry (AI) as a theoretical lens to guide the exploration of student support and enhance the MenTut programme, aiming to improve student wellbeing and success within our institution. Data were primarily collected from 1,446 undergraduates (mentees) who consented to the use of the data collected. A questionnaire with five (5) closed-ended Likert scale question items and one open-ended question was shared via Microsoft Forms to explore students’ experiences with MenTut. Closed-ended questions were analysed to provide descriptive graphs, while one open-ended question was thematically analysed. Although the findings show that many undergraduate students (mentees) were satisfied with the tutorial sessions offered, some concerns were raised regarding inadequate infrastructure, venue constraints, tutor communication and delivery, engagement and active learning, as well as tutors’ attitudes and professionalism. Drawing from findings, the paper recommends administering systematic and subsequent surveys each semester to evaluate the effectiveness of student support initiatives and to facilitate ongoing, data-informed improvements to the program. This paper concludes by proposing an Academic and Reflective Enhancement Theoretical Lens (ARETL) that could be adopted to enhance any student support programme in higher education institutions.

Keywords: {'name': 'Student Support, Undergraduate Students, Student Wellbeing and Success, Tutorials, Mentors, Mentees'}

Authors & affiliations

Fhatuwani Ravhuhali
University of Venda

Takalani Yolanda Tshililo
University of Venda

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Ajani, T. (2024). Faculty development for digital teaching in African universities: Post-pandemic imperatives. Journal of Educational Development in Africa, 9(2), 77–94.

Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518–529.

DOI: 10.55667/10.55667/ijede.2024.v39.i1.1333

Charag, A. H., & Fazili, A. (2017). Defining appreciative inquiry: A review of research. Journal of Management Research, 5(1), 1–9.

Clark, S. (2019). Creating a supportive learning environment in tutorial sessions. Journal of College Student Development, 60(2), 215–229.

Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. Berrett-Koehler.

DOI: 10.14705/rpnet.2017.emmd2016.634

DOI: 10.1177/0022466918790001

DOI: 10.36892/ijlls.v2i3.380

DOI: 10.1177/1056492616688087

Hammond, S. A. (2013). The thin book of appreciative inquiry (3rd ed.). Thin Book Publishing.

DOI: 10.3758/s13428-023-02218-x

Hargraves, V. (2020). Using data for inquiry and improvement. https://theeducationhub.org.nz/using-data-for-inquiry-and-improvement/

Hennig, L., Smith, J., & Patel, R. (2024). Designing effective virtual mentoring programs: Motivations and engagement strategies in higher education. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 13(3), 210–228.

DOI: 10.2505/4/ss17_040_08_64

DOI: 10.1177/0044118X10388219

DOI: 10.31703/grr.2019(IV-II).57

Kostecki, A. (2024). Use data to make informed decisions: Understanding the importance of data-driven decision making. https://nationalstrathub.cogta.gov.za/resources/articles/use-data-to-make-informed-decisions-understanding-the-importance-of-data-driven-decision-making/

DOI: 10.70875/v8i4article5

DOI: 10.1080/14753634.2010.489386

DOI: 10.24085/jsaa.v5i2.2707

DOI: 10.1177/1469787415616720

Ntakana, K. N. (2011). The effectiveness of student support programmes at a tertiary institution: A case study of Walter Sisulu University (Master’s thesis, University of Zululand). https://uzspace.unizulu.ac.za/server/api/core/bitstreams/5dd62db9-2e08-46df-aaee-be89159b093a/content

Oliver, C. (2005). Reflexive inquiry: A framework for consultancy practice. Karnac.

DOI: 10.1177/14687941211045192

Preskill, H., & Grindle, A. (2015). Guide to appreciative inquiry. https://www.fsg.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Guide-to-Appreciative-Inquiry.pdf

DOI: 10.20853/38-2-6134

Rayhan, R. U., Zheng, Y., Uddin, E., Timbol, C., Adewuyi, O., & Baraniuk, J. N. (2013). Administer and collect medical questionnaires with Google documents: A simple, safe, and free system. Applied Medical Informatics, 33(3), 12–21.

Schifter, C. C., Natarajan, U., Ketelhut, D. J., & Kirchgessner, A. (2014). Data-driven decision making: Facilitating teacher use of student data to inform classroom instruction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 14(4), 419–432.

Starkhagen, C. (2022). Closed-ended vs open-ended questions: Benefits and uses. https://www.involve.me/blog/closed-ended-questions-vs-open-ended-questions-what-are-the-benefits-and-when-to-use-them

DOI: 10.1002/9781118256060

Whitney, D., & Trosten-Bloom, A. (2010). The power of appreciative inquiry (2nd ed.). Berrett-Koehler.