Balancing power and policy: governing South Africa through a fragile national unity coalition
Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2025 · Vol. 7 / Issue 3 · 463-470
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The formation of South Africa’s Government of National Unity (GNU) following the 2024 general elections marked a significant departure from dominant-party governance. This article examines the political and institutional challenges that have emerged under this coalition arrangement. Drawing on developments involving major actors such as the African National Congress and the Democratic Alliance, the paper analyses how ideological divergence, administrative fragmentation, and the absence of formal coalition protocols have constrained governance capacity. The study evaluates five interrelated domains: policy coherence, institutional coordination, service delivery, coalition stability, and democratic legitimacy. It does so through the lens of consociational democracy and coalition stability theory. The analysis highlights how tactical alliances and power brokering by smaller parties, combined with limited public engagement, have eroded public trust and stalled reform. Although the GNU has prevented a political breakdown and created a platform for dialogue, it has not yet been translated into functional governance. The article argues that South Africa’s experience emphasizes the need for structural reforms, including codified coalition agreements, electoral reform, and enhanced civic participation. By critically assessing the GNU’s governance trajectory, this study offers lessons for other transitional democracies navigating the tension between pluralism and administrative effectiveness.
Keywords: {'name': 'Coalition governance'}, {'name': 'Government of National Unity'}, {'name': 'South Africa'}, {'name': 'Democratic stability'}, {'name': 'Policy coherence'}, {'name': 'Institutional reform'}, {'name': 'Power-sharing'}
Authors & affiliations
Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
Alexander, W. (n.d.). A bold move or the end? The DA, the ANC, and the Value Added Tax (VAT) strains on the Government of National Unity. Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom. Retrieved April 8, 2025, from https://www.freiheit.org/liberal-workshop-south-africa/bold-move-or-end-da-anc-and-value-added-tax-vat-strains-government
Beukes, J., Chigwata, T., & de Visser, J. (2024). Unpacking the 2024 Government of National Unity in South Africa: Challenges, opportunities, and lessons for stable coalition governance [Policy brief]. Dullah Omar Institute, University of the Western Cape. Retrieved April 3, 2025, from https://dullahomarinstitute.org.za/multilevel-govt/publications/doi-policy-brief-on-gnus.pdf
Bosman, I., Rubidge, L., & Gruzd, S. (2024). Coalitions and the GNU in South Africa: Proposals to embrace, pitfalls to avoid. South African Institute of International Affairs. Retrieved April 6, 2025, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep65347
Chikane, R., & Everatt, D. (2025). The captive democracy of SA’s coalition governance. Wits School of Governance. Retrieved April 4, 2025, from https://www.wsg.ac.za/news/captive-democracy-sas-coalition-governance
CIVICUS. (2024). South Africa’s coalition experiment: New government must deliver progress, restore trust and work with civil society. CIVICUS Lens. Retrieved April 2, 2025, from https://lens.civicus.org/south-africas-coalition-experiment/
Gumede, W. (2023). Policy Brief 46: Improving coalition governance. Democracy Works Foundation. Retrieved April 2, 2025, from https://www.democracyworks.org.za/policy-brief-improving-coalition-governance/
Human Sciences Research Council. (2024). South Africa’s unity government: 4 crucial factors for it to work. Retrieved April 3, 2025, from https://hsrc.ac.za/news/governance/south-africas-unity-government-4-crucial-factors-for-it-to-work/
DOI: 10.1080/02589346.2025.2488576
DOI: 10.55190/JPADA.2024.326
Naidoo, V., & Levy, B. (2025). South Africa’s coalition government is at risk of crumbling: Why collapse would carry a heavy cost. The Conversation. Retrieved April 16, 2025, from https://theconversation.com/south-africas-coalition-government-is-at-risk-of-crumbling-why-collapse-would-carry-a-heavy-cost-254302
Ngcetane-Vika, T. (2025, January 22). The South African Government of National Unity: Successes, Failures, and Lessons for Transitional Democracies [Lecture]. Center for African Studies, Ohio State University. Retrieved April 3, 2025, from https://cas.osu.edu/events/south-african-government-national-unity-successes-failures-and-lessons-transitional
Nogueira Pinto, T. (2024, August 23). The South African coalition government’s daunting agenda. GIS Reports. Retrieved April 3, 2025, from https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/south-africa-coalition-govt/GIS Reports+6
Obe, A. V. (2024). South Africa’s new coalition government heralds change for the region and its leaders. Chatham House. Retrieved April 4, 2025, from https://www.chathamhouse.org/2024/06/south-africas-new-coalition-government-heralds-change-region-and-its-leaders
Ragolane, M., & Khoza, N. G. (2024). The role of political compromise in South Africa’s Government of National Unity: Balancing competing interests for stability and peacebuilding. ACCORD. Retrieved April 4, 2025, from https://www.accord.org.za/conflict-trends/the-role-of-political-compromise-in-south-africas-government-of-national-unity-balancing-competing-interests-for-stability-and-peacebuilding/
Seane, K. (2024, December 14). Government of national unity: The DA is compromised. Mail & Guardian. Retrieved April 4, 2025, from https://mg.co.za/thought-leader/opinion/2024-12-14-government-of-national-unity-the-da-is-compromised/
Steytler, N. (2024, November 14). South Africa’s Government of National Unity: Power sharing in a fractured democracy. IACL-AIDC Blog. Retrieved April 12, 2025, from https://blog-iacl-aidc.org/2024-posts/2024/11/14/south-africas-government-of-national-unity-power-sharing-in-a-fractured-democracy