Examining the long-term effects of Apartheid’s Tribal Classification on ethnic tensions and political fragmentation in post-apartheid South Africa

Abstract

The apartheid regime in South Africa enforced policies of ethnic classification and segregation, most notably through the establishment of tribal designations that aimed to divide the Bantu-speaking populations into separate homelands. These policies fostered deep-rooted ethnic tensions, resource conflicts, and political fragmentation that continue to influence South African society today. While apartheid officially ended in 1994, its legacy persists, especially in the form of ongoing tribal disputes, political party alignments, and competition for scarce resources. This study investigates how the apartheid-era tribal classification system has contributed to contemporary ethnic division, focusing on its impact on national unity, political polarization, and economic inequality. It explores the way these historical divisions persist in political party identification such as the geopolitical origins of political parties often dictate their tribal affiliation and the resulting fragmentation of the national political landscape. Additionally, the study examines how tribalism continues to affect cultural industries, where artists and entertainers often find themselves confined by tribal boundaries rather than celebrating a unified South African identity. Drawing on theories of social identity and post-colonial nationalism, this paper aims to provide insights into the importance of addressing these historical divisions through dialogue, reconciliation, and inclusive nation-building. The goal is to highlight strategies for overcoming tribalism and fostering a cohesive national identity that transcends historical divisions and promotes peace and unity.

Keywords: {'name': 'apartheid'}, {'name': 'Ethnic division'}, {'name': 'South Africa'}, {'name': 'Political fragmetation'}, {'name': 'tribal clarification'}

Authors & affiliations

Vutivi Tony Mkhacani
University of Limpopo

Stewart Lee Kugara
University of Limpopo

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.4314/gjds.v14i2.5

Akaman, S. (2023). What is target population: definition & examples. https://forms.app/en/blog/target-population

Adam, H., & Moodley, K. (2023). The opening of the apartheid mind: Options for the new South Africa (Vol. 50). University of California Press.

DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2022.2127491

DOI: 10.32873/uno.dc.ID.10.1.1177

Apartheid Museum. (2025). The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). https://www.apartheidmuseum.org

DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.13115

Commission on Restitution of Land Rights. (2025). Annual report 2024/25 (01 April 2024–31 March 2025). Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development.

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (Act 108 of 1996). (1996). Government Gazette No. 17678. South African Government.

Department of Basic Education. (2013). The incremental introduction of African languages (IIAL) in South African schools: Draft policy (September 2013). https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/Documents/Policies/IIAL%20Policy%20September%202013%20(3).pdf

DOI: 10.5771/9781793631275

DOI: 10.2307/jj.5973059

DOI: 10.7196/SAJBL.2019.v12i2.00679

DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2019.1666703

Hinterstoisser, T. M. (2024). Alumni engagement strategies that work. https://www.vitaeready.org/stories/alumni-engagement-strategies-that-work/

DOI: 10.1177/0081246314533634

Makhanikhe, T. J. (2022). The relationship between leadership and local government on land allocation: A case of Thulamela Local Municipality [PhD thesis]. University of Venda.

Makhathini, S. (2023). South Africa Truth and Reconciliation Commission (1996–2002). https://atjhub.csvr.org.za/south-africa-truth-and-reconciliation-commission-1996-2002/

Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and subject: Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton University Press.

DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190274801.013.10

Mithika, S. (2020). Intercultural dialogue: Why we need it in our classrooms. World Council on Intercultural and Global Competence. https://iccglobal.org/2020/09/30/intercultural-dialogue-why-we-need-it-in-our-classrooms/

National Planning Commission. (2012). National development plan 2030: Our future — make it work. The Presidency. https://www.gov.za/documents/other/national-development-plan-2030-our-future-make-it-work-15-aug-2012

DOI: 10.20853/31-4-1330

Neocosmos, M. (2010). From foreign natives to native foreigners: Explaining xenophobia in post-apartheid South Africa. African Books Collective.

Ngcukaitobi, T. (2021). Land matters: South Africa's failed land reforms and the road ahead. Penguin Random House South Africa.

DOI: 10.11116/9789461665386

DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.102998

DOI: 10.1177/0743915620964114

Seekings, J. (2015). The social consequences of class formation among Black South Africans in the 2000s: Evidence from the South African Reconciliation Barometer. University of Cape Town.

Sharma, J. (2025). Importance of extracurricular activities in student development. https://www.21kschool.com/za/blog/importance-of-extracurricular-activities/

Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act, 2003 (Act 41 of 2003). (2003). Government Gazette, 25855. South African Government.

DOI: 10.31920/2075-6534/2019/9n1a8

University of Limpopo. (2025). Faculty of humanities. https://www.ul.ac.za/faculty-of-humanities/

University Sports South Africa. (2017). Vision and mission. https://ussa.org.za/1overview.php

DOI: 10.1080/02589346.2019.1579457