Constructs of essentialist diversity discourse that undermine social cohesion in post-apartheid South Africa

Abstract

South Africa continues to experience a prevalent predisposition to using diversity to over-emphasise difference to justify exclusion at the expense of a constitutionally inspired social cohesion. However, research has yet to highlight essentialist diversity discourse that undermines the aim of social cohesion in South Africa. Accordingly, this study examines the constructs of essentialist diversity discourse that undermine the aim of social cohesion in Post-Apartheid South Africa. This study utilised an inductive qualitative content analysis approach. Data, in particular, secondary text collected from court judgements, was analysed using qualitative inductive content analysis. The inductive qualitative content analysis highlights that linguicism, historicentrism, cultural and heritage purism and racial supremacy constitute key essentialist diversity discourse, manifest exclusion and divisions. The constructs of the essentialist discourse of diversity fragment the South African society and undermine the inclusivity as the aims of social cohesion. The findings indicate that the government needs to focus on promoting multiculturalism through celebrating differences and highlighting an inclusive narrative to make communities comfortable with being different together in order to make progress towards social cohesion in South Africa

Keywords: {'name': 'Essentialism; exclusion; unity; diversity; social cohesion; South Africa'}

Authors & affiliations

Fundiswa T Khaile
University of the Western Cape

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1080/03057070.2016.1126455

AfriForum and Another v University of the Free State CCT 101/17 [2017] ZACC 48; 2018 (2) SA 185 (CC); 2018 (4) BCLR 387 (CC). (2017, December 29).

AfriForum NPC v Nelson Mandela Foundation Trust and Others (Case no 371/2020) [2023] ZASCA 58. (2023, April 21). https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/2023/58.html

DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2022.2127491

DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.12068

Banks, J. A. (2015). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching. Routledge.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.003

DOI: 10.4324/9781003021339

DOI: 10.26686/pq.v1i4.4700

DOI: 10.1080/1362102042000214705

DOI: 10.1332/030557307780713004

Byram, M. (2009). Multicultural societies, pluricultural people and the project of intercultural education, Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/multicultural-societies-pluricultural-people-and-the-project-of-interc/16805a223c

Carrell, M., Mann, E., & Sigler, T. (2006). Defining workforce diversity programs and practices in organisations: A longitudinal study. Labour Law Journal, 57(1), 5–12.

Celliers and Others v Kleinfontein Aandeleblok (Edms) BPK and Another (Leave to Appeal) (4755/2022) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1103. (2024, October 31).

DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2022.2054845

City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality v AfriForum and Another [2016] ZACC 19. (2016). http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2016/19.pdf

DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8129.2007.00292.x

DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.139

DOI: 10.1177/00393207241259743

DAC (Department of Arts and Culture). (2012). A national strategy for developing an inclusive and a cohesive South African society. http://www.dac.gov.za/sites/default/files/National-Strategy-Social-Cohesion-2012.pdf

Devenger, N. (2021). Heterogeneous and homogeneous groups. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/political-science/heterogeneous-and-homogeneous-groups

Devi Prasad, B. (2019). Qualitative content analysis: Why is it still a path less taken? Qualitative Social Research, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3392

DOI: 10.17159/obiter.v43i1.13504

DOI: 10.1002/9781119316916.ch17

DOI: 10.4324/9781003315735-14

Gabriel, R. (2021). Teacher-researchers and feminist pedagogies: Developing agency in curriculum design. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(4), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1882154

Gelyke Kanse and Others v Chairperson of the Senate of the University of Stellenbosch and Others [2019] ZACC 38. (2019). https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2019/38.pdf

Gumede, W. (2025). Fostering a common South Africanness based on democracy, diversity and social justice (Occasional Paper 1). Inclusive Society Institute. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1787kuNA-Agneg0NVzbloVivDG8-cm-Jc/view

DOI: 10.1177/0146167215607351

DOI: 10.1177/0022022116681845

DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2013.808754

DOI: 10.1108/EDI-08-2014-0061

DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2009.09.005

DOI: 10.1177/0010414008325286

DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687

Inclusive Society Institute. (2024). The South Africa social cohesion index: Measuring the well-being of a society. Inclusive Society Institute. https://www.inclusivesociety.org.za/post/the-south-africa-social-cohesion-index-measuring-the-well-being-of-a-society

Jackson, J. (2011). Neoliberalism and education: A critical overview. Journal of Education Policy, 26(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2010.515632

Joshi, A. (2019). Celebrate diversity, but universality too. https://www.forbesindia.com/article/weschool/celebrate-diversity-but-universality-too/54497/1