Centralised recruitment for senior management in South Africa's public sector: Implications for service delivery

Abstract

This study explored whether centralising human resource management (HRM) for SMS appointments can improve recruitment efficiency, enhance transparency, and curtail patronage, while examining the broader implications for public sector governance and service provision. A qualitative, secondary data-driven systematic review was conducted following an adapted PRISMA protocol, with 16 peer-reviewed and governmental documents (2014 – 2024) retained. Thematic analysis proceeded through open, axial and thematic coding, generating four overarching themes: (1) Control vs autonomy, (2) Equity vs effectiveness, (3) Political legitimacy vs technocratic efficiency, and (4) Hybrid governance potential. The findings revealed that three interrelated challenges dominate the current centralised model: (i) Bureaucratic delays and capacity constraints; (ii) Loss of departmental autonomy; (iii) Contextual insensitivity. Conversely, centralisation delivers standardisation, fairness, and merit-based safeguards, providing a transparent platform for oversight and reducing overt patronage. The study proposes a calibrated hybrid architecture. Implementing the hybrid model aligns with constitutional mandates for merit, equity and accountability, while preserving departmental flexibility essential for effective service delivery. It offers a pragmatic pathway to break the "politicised hiring" cycle, improve vacancy-to-fill rates, and restore public trust in senior appointments across the health, education, water, and fiscal management sectors. By synthesising institutional theoretical perspectives with empirical evidence from South Africa and comparative BRICS cases, this research advances understanding of how centralised HRM can be re-engineered to balance technocratic efficiency with contextual responsiveness. The proposed governance framework provides a replicable blueprint for public-sector reform in resource-constrained, highly politicised environments.

Keywords: {'name': 'Centralised recruitment'}, {'name': 'Senior management officials'}, {'name': 'Public Sector'}, {'name': 'appointments'}, {'name': 'South Africa'}

Authors & affiliations

Mosekama Osia Mokhele
Nelson Mandela University

Simon Matome Nkgapele
Sol Plaatje University

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-68930-2_2

Berman, E. M., Bowman, J. S., West, J. P., & Van Wart, M. R. (2019). Human resource management in public service: Paradoxes, processes and problems (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101838

Brennan, J. (2020). “One size fits all”: The impact of a standardised recruitment process on employee engagement in the public sector (Doctoral dissertation). National College of Ireland. https://norma.ncirl.ie/id/eprint/4887

DOI: 10.22495/ncpr_22

Brunette, R. (2019). The politics of South Africa’s patronage system (Part One). Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI).

Brunette, R. (2024). Checking political discretion in recruitment to South Africa’s public administration.

Brunette, R. (2025). Limiting political influence on appointments in the South African public administration. Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI).

Bvuma, S. (2026, March 25). Token digital transformation: A failure of technology or leadership? SowetanLIVE. https://www.sowetan.co.za/opinion/2026-03-25-stella-bvuma-token-digital-transformation-a-failure-of-technology-or-leadership/

DOI: 10.61967/adminpub.2024.32.3.4

DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-2889-7.ch013

DOI: 10.4102/sajhrm.v20i0.1972

DOI: 10.1108/GM-04-2021-0095

DOI: 10.31730/osf.io/7az4u

Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA). (2021). Public administration and management delegations 2021: Report on compliance with departments with the directive on public administration delegations. Government Printer.

DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-2889-7.ch003

Eyamu, S., Wanyama, S., Ndanyi, D., & Sansa, A. (2021). A critical analysis of new public management, human resource practices and operational performance in Uganda’s public sector. Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(4), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20210904.11

DOI: 10.4102/apsdpr.v9i1.562

DOI: 10.1177/0734371X221078784

DOI: 10.37602/IJSSMR.2024.7510

DOI: 10.1177/23477989251403229

DOI: 10.5296/jpag.v9i1.13798

DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190861162.013.19

Leite, F., & Chipkin, C. (2021). The paradox of reform: A response to the Ramaphosa government's proposal for professionalising the public service (GAPP Working Paper 1(5)). Government and Public Policy.

Leite, F., & Chipkin, C. (2023). Political influence or merit-based appointments? How South Africa can resolve the tension over top public service jobs. Global Government Forum. https://www.globalgovernmentforum.com/political-influence-or-merit-based-appointments-how-south-africa-can-resolve-the-tension-over-top-public-service-jobs/

Levy, B., Hirsch, A., Naidoo, V., & Nxele, M. (2021). South Africa: When strong institutions and massive inequalities collide. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

DOI: 10.1177/00910260221146145

DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i4.4212

DOI: 10.25159/1998-8125/13795

DOI: 10.35683/jcman1062.238

DOI: 10.31920/2634-3649/2022/SIv2a2

DOI: 10.1111/gove.12914

DOI: 10.31098/jgrcs.v3i2.1893

DOI: 10.5130/cjlg.vi25.7701

DOI: 10.1002/pa.1935

DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-2889-7.ch010

DOI: 10.4102/ac.v23i1.1112

DOI: 10.63922/ajmesc.v5i02.1277

DOI: 10.4102/apsdpr.v11i1.648

Mosweu, O. (2018). A framework to authenticate records in a government accounting system in Botswana to support the auditing process (Doctoral thesis). University of South Africa.

DOI: 10.4102/sajhrm.v19i0.1394

DOI: 10.47540/ijias.v3i1.692

DOI: 10.25159/1998-8125/18742

DOI: 10.53378/irssr.353136

DOI: 10.1177/10564926241237446

DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1535

Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1993). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.

Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI). (n.d.). Public administration (Working Paper 2). PARI.

Public Service Commission. (2019). Guide on government practice for executive authorities and heads of departments. Government Printer.

Public Service Commission. (2024). Annual report 2023/2024. Government Printer.

DOI: 10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.29990

Republic of South Africa. (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. Government Printers.

DOI: 10.36369/ajgd.v12i1.17

DOI: 10.25159/0256-8845/3849

DOI: 10.1177/0734371X20932997

DOI: 10.1177/1056492614545304

DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2016.1249223

DOI: 10.17159/2077-4907/2021/ldd.v25.15

DOI: 10.31098/ijmesh.v6i1.1242

DOI: 10.5354/0719-0816.2023.69410