Gradual gains: The dynamic export effects of Turkey’s regional trade agreements
Tuğba Ortay Baykal
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026 · Vol. 15 / Issue 3 · 210-220
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:45 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This study examines the magnitude, timing, and persistence of export gains from Turkey’s regional trade agreements (RTAs), addressing why previous studies found null effects despite extensive preferential liberalization. A structural gravity framework analyzes Turkey’s bilateral exports to over 160 partners (1996–2020) using PPML estimation with country-pair fixed effects. Dynamic RTA indicators capture anticipation and phased-in effects over twelve years, while time-varying border coefficients isolate policy effects from globalization trends. RTAs generate large, persistent export gains that accumulate gradually rather than immediately. Cumulative effects reach 815 percent over twelve years without globalization controls, or 102 percent when secular trends are absorbed, both of which are economically substantial. The absence of anticipation effects validates causal interpretation. Trade agreements function as medium- to long-term integration instruments. Policy continuity and complementary domestic reforms amplify RTA benefits. This study provides the first comprehensive dynamic assessment of Turkey’s RTA effects within a structural gravity framework, resolving puzzling null findings from earlier specifications and establishing bounds on policy-attributable export gains.
Keywords: {'name': 'Structural gravity, Turkey, regional trade agreements, PPML, dynamic effects, trade policy'}
Authors & affiliations
Tuğba Ortay Baykal
Istanbul Commerce University
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1080/09638199.2016.1219381
Alper, C. E., & Alper, I. (2015). Analysis of Turkey’s export to EU: A gravity model approach. In B. Neyaptı & N. Tunaer (Eds.), Macroeconomic policies for Turkey: Analytics and evidence. Istanbul Bilgi University Press.
DOI: 10.1257/000282803321455214
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.03.005
Baier, S. L., Bergstrand, J. H., & Feng, M. (2023). Reappraisal of the economic growth effects of free trade agreements. In P. Egger & M. Larch (Eds.), Handbook of international trade agreements. Springer.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2018.11.002
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.06.003
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.06.001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9396.2009.00877.x
DOI: 10.1177/1536867X20909691
DOI: 10.1007/s11558-013-9179-8
DOI: 10.1111/ecca.12394
Egger, P. H., & Nigai, S. (2022). Structural gravity with dummies only: Constrained ANOVA-type estimation of gravity models. Journal of International Economics, 137, 103587.
Ejones, F., Agbola, F. W., & Mahmood, A. (2021). Regional trade agreements and trade creation in the East African Community. Journal of African Trade, 8(1), 1–15.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.05.005
Freund, C., & Ornelas, E. (2021). Regional trade agreements: Blessing or burden? In K. Basu & T. Cordella (Eds.), Handbook of globalization, development and gender. Edward Elgar.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01134.x
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-54314-1.00003-3
DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-7981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2007.00392.x
DOI: 10.1080/09638199.2013.873479
Kutuk, M. M., & Akbostancı, E. (2015). Impact of trade agreements on Turkey’s foreign trade: A panel data analysis. In A. Gil-Lafuente, J. Merigó, B. Hogy, & N. Sezer (Eds.), Scientific methods for the treatment of uncertainty in social sciences. Springer.
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4359371
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4359371
Larch, M., & Yotov, Y. V. (2024). Trade agreements do increase trade. Annual Review of Economics, 16, 471–500.
Larch, M., Wrona, J., & Yotov, Y. V. (2019). Bi- and unilateral trade effects of joining the Euro. Economics Letters, 183, 108559.
Lin, X., & Lin, J. (2023). The effects of trade agreements on trade in services: A structural gravity analysis. Review of World Economics, 159(2), 399–430.
Magee, C. S. P. (2020). Endogenous preferential trade agreements: Evidence from the data. In L. Y. Ing & M. Yu (Eds.), World trade evolution. Routledge.
DOI: 10.1007/s10290-021-00420-7
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1994531
Murakami, Y. (2025). Deep regional trade agreements and production networks in East Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 96, 101886.
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4744504
Olmos, L., & Rodríguez-Barco, J. M. (2020). On the sensitivity of trade creation estimates. Economics Letters, 197, 109601.
Ruta, M. (2024). Deep trade agreements: Anchoring global value chains in developing countries. World Bank Publications.
DOI: 10.1162/rest.88.4.641
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2009.01180.x
Suvankulov, F., & Ali, M. A. (2012). Macro determinants of Turkey-Pakistan bilateral trade. Transition Studies Review, 19(3), 297–312.
Tufekci, O. K., & Bayrak, R. (2025). Analysis of Turkey’s trade potential with the Turkic States through the gravity model. Bilig: Journal of Social Sciences of the Turkish World. Advance online publication.
UNCTAD & WTO. (2016). An advanced guide to trade policy analysis: The structural gravity model. United Nations.
World Trade Organization. (2023). World trade statistical review 2023. World Trade Organization.
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.08.032
DOI: 10.30875/abc0167e-en
Yu, S., Beugelsdijk, S., Gereffi, G., & de Haan, J. (2025). Trade agreements and technology transfer: New evidence from patent data. Journal of International Economics, 153, 103934.