CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJRBSPUBLICATION RECORD

The influence of organisational design on gender-specific stress and workplace productivity

Ntombenhle Mandlazi ORCID ↗

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026 · Vol. 15 / Issue 3 · 158-164

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS0

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations0Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC

Mendeley · Readers—No verified count available

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

Despite growing scholarly attention to occupational stress and gender, the role of organisational design in shaping gendered stress experiences remains insufficiently theorised and empirically explored. This study addresses a critical gap by examining how organisational design, beyond individual or role-based factors, shapes gender-specific stress experiences and productivity outcomes. While existing research has explored occupational stress and gender dynamics, limited attention has been given to how organisational structures, cultures, and embedded norms sustain these disparities within specific professional contexts. Focusing on Social Auxiliary Workers in a South African public sector setting, the study provides contextually grounded insights into the organisational determinants of gendered stress. It explores how organisational arrangements generate systemic challenges experienced differently by men and women, influencing both well-being and performance. The study highlights gendered perceptions of workplace stressors, including those related to hierarchical positioning, role expectations, and unequal access to career opportunities. Data were collected from male and female Social Auxiliary Workers employed by the Mpumalanga Department of Social Development. Guided by Person–Environment Fit Theory, the study conceptualises stress as arising from the alignment or misalignment between individual characteristics and organisational environments. The findings underscore the need for gender-sensitive organisational practices, inclusive workplace cultures, and targeted wellness interventions to mitigate stress and promote equity. The study contributes to scholarship by extending theoretical and empirical understandings of gendered occupational stress within under-researched public sector contexts, while highlighting the importance of addressing organisational stressors to enhance employee well-being, sustainable productivity, and equity.

Keywords: {'name': 'Organisational design, Gender-specific stress, Workplace productivity, Occupational stress, Employee wellness programs'}

Authors & affiliations

Ntombenhle Mandlazi
Social Work, University of Fort Hare

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1177/089124390004002002

Bamidele, R. (2022). Organizational culture. In Industrial sociology, industrial relations and human resource management (pp. 284–292). Fab Educational Books.

DOI: 10.7249/RGSD389

Beer, O. W. J. (2016). Predictors of and causes of stress among social workers: A national survey (Master’s thesis). University of Plymouth.

DOI: 10.15270/50-2-393

DOI: 10.2307/2666999

DOI: 10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22004-2

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20085541

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01582

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190939717.003.0023

Harlin, D. (2013). Employer perspectives on employee wellness programs (Master’s thesis). University of Washington.

Hing, L. S. S., Chun, S., Giguere, S. L., Goodman, J. M., Ferkul, K., & Coffey, S. (2023). Gender inequities in the workplace: A holistic review of organizational processes and practices. Journal of Organizational Behavior.

DOI: 10.3390/admsci14090196

DOI: 10.1007/s10926-021-09978-3

Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books.

DOI: 10.31838/jcr.07.06.25

DOI: 10.4102/sajip.v45i0.1661

DOI: 10.5590/IJAMT.2017.16.1.04

Nguyen, T. V., & Smith, J. P. (2022). Employee voice and inclusive organisational change: Empirical evidence from public and private sectors. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(4), 789–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1871234

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032008

DOI: 10.1177/0003122413515997

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01400

DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2340129

Thabane, B. J. (2015). The sources of workplace stress among employees of SA Post Office Central Region (Master’s thesis). University of Pretoria.

DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104702

DOI: 10.1002/job.2607

World Health Organization. (2019). Burn-out an occupational phenomenon: International Classification of Diseases. WHO. https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burn-out-an-occupational-phenomenon

DOI: 10.56536/ijmres.v12i3.215