Listening, speaking and learning: Teachers’ use of low-tech digital tools to enhance learner engagement in English First Additional Language (EFAL) classrooms
Makwalete Malatji ORCID ↗ · Victor Rhulani Nkuna
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026 · Vol. 15 / Issue 3 · 426-437
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 22:56 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Learner engagement in English First Additional Language classrooms is a pressing concern in many rural South African schools, characterised by overcrowding and limited digital infrastructure. This study explored how teachers integrate low-tech digital tools to enhance listening and speaking skills in such contexts. Guided by a qualitative interpretive approach, data were collected from eight English First Additional Language teachers across rural primary schools through semi-structured interviews and were analysed thematically. The findings revealed that teachers use low-tech digital tools primarily to support storytelling, manage overcrowded classrooms, and sustain learner interest despite connectivity challenges. While low-tech digital tools improved learner participation and attentiveness, infrastructural constraints and inconsistent internet access limited their full potential. The study recommends targeted teacher development, improved school-level digital support and context-sensitive integration strategies to strengthen English First Additional Language engagement. By foregrounding teachers’ lived experiences, the article contributes to ongoing debates on equitable and pedagogically sound technology integration in resource-constrained settings
Authors & affiliations
Makwalete Malatji
UNISA
Victor Rhulani Nkuna
University of South Africa
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1441
DOI: 10.1108/JARHE-08-2020-0256
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01381-z
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266
DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-024-12456-x
DOI: 10.12959/issn.1855-0541.IIASS-2015-no1-art09
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
DOI: 10.1007/s10212-023-00734-0
DOI: 10.3390/su14116844
DOI: 10.1080/18117295.2023.2244217
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.003
Jacobsen, K. (2023). Solving South Africa's literacy crisis. Independent Education. https://www.ieducation.co.za/solving-south-africas-literacy-crisis/
DOI: 10.17576/ebangi.2024.2103.18
DOI: 10.5539/elt.v12n1p169
DOI: 10.3389/fcomm.2023.1081155
DOI: 10.1007/s44020-022-00029-9
DOI: 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
DOI: 10.18785/jetde.1802.07
DOI: 10.46303/jcsr.2023.8
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2024.2425442
DOI: 10.20944/preprints202506.1282.v1
DOI: 10.1177/16094069251400179
DOI: 10.36941/jesr-2022-0072
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102380
DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2022.2121314
DOI: 10.4314/jlt.v55i1.7
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. SAGE.
DOI: 10.1145/3568231.3568266
DOI: 10.21512/lc.v16i1.7752
DOI: 10.3390/educsci14060580
DOI: 10.58885/ijllis.v12i8.31vt
DOI: 10.1002/tesq.3165
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1267767
DOI: 10.32038/ltrq.2025.51.12
DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2020.1841148
DOI: 10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140607
DOI: 10.1080/09571736.2020.1786712