Coping with climate change-related risks in rural Zimbabwe: Evidence from Bikita <i>D</i>istrict
Victor Jaravaza · Hilda Jaka Mabiza
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026 · Vol. 15 / Issue 4 · 378-394
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Climate change poses significant risks to rural livelihoods in semi-arid regions such as Bikita District, Zimbabwe, where recurrent droughts, erratic rainfall, rising temperatures, and water scarcity undermine food security and socio-economic stability. This study examines the climate-related risks faced by rural households, identifies the coping and adaptation strategies they employ, and assesses the effectiveness and sustainability of these responses. A qualitative case study design, guided by the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework, was adopted. Data were collected through in-depth interviews (n = 30), focus group discussions (two groups), and direct observations involving households, traditional leaders, and local stakeholders. Thematic analysis was used to identify patterns in risks, coping strategies, and institutional constraints. The findings show that households employ diverse strategies, including crop diversification, cultivation of drought-resistant small grains, water harvesting, livestock downsizing, livelihood diversification, horticulture, and reliance on social networks. However, many of these responses remain short-term coping mechanisms rather than sustainable adaptation strategies. Structural barriers, including limited access to credit, weak extension services, poor infrastructure, and inadequate market systems, constrain their effectiveness. In addition, some practices, including deforestation and over-reliance on food aid, are maladaptive, providing immediate relief while undermining long-term resilience. The study concludes that although rural households demonstrate significant adaptive capacity, their transition from short-term coping to sustainable adaptation is limited by systemic and institutional constraints. It highlights the need for integrated policy interventions that strengthen livelihood assets, enhance institutional support, improve access to finance and markets, and integrate indigenous knowledge with climate-smart practices. These findings contribute to climate adaptation scholarship and provide policy-relevant insights for building long-term resilience in rural Zimbabwe.
Keywords: {'name': 'Climate change adaptation'}, {'name': 'Rural livelihoods'}, {'name': 'Coping strategies'}, {'name': 'Sustainable Livelihoods Framework'}, {'name': 'Zimbabwe'}
Authors & affiliations
Victor Jaravaza
Great Zimbabwe University
Hilda Jaka Mabiza
College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1191/1464993403ps060oa
DOI: 10.1007/s40899-024-01040-3
DOI: 10.2166/wcc.2022.099
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2025.100417
DOI: 10.55248/gengpi.6.0525.1734
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.08.008
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.004
Batterbury, S.P.J. (2008). Sustainable livelihoods: still being sought, ten years on. Presented at Sustainable Livelihoods Framework: ten years of researching the poor African Environments Programme workshop, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, 24th January 2008. 15pp. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Simon-Batterbury/publication/237467916_Sustainable_livelihoods_still_being_sought_ten_years_on/links/55a2ab4a08aea54aa81567fd/Sustainable-livelihoods-still-being-sought-ten-years-on.pdf. Accessed on 31/04/25
Bekele, A.E., & Abddisa, F.M. (2015). Vulnerability to food insecurity and households' coping strategies. Journal of Rural Development, 34 (4) pp. 529 -542
DOI: 10.3390/cli12110191
DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2012.755012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-64599-5_6
DOI: 10.17159/sajs.2016/20140286
DOI: 10.1163/09744061-tat00013
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7384456/v1
Chitja, J., Mthiyane, C., Mariga, I., Shimelis, H., Murugani, V., Morojele, P., Naidoo, K., & Aphane, O. (2016). Empowerment of women through water use security, land use security and knowledge generation for improved household food security and sustainable rural livelihoods in selected areas in Limpopo (2082/1/15). http://www.wrc.org.za/Knowledge%20Hub%20Documents/Research%20Reports/2082-1-15.pdf
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-015-0761-x
DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2735
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). New York, Routledge.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-99411-2_14
Dube, K. (2020). NGOs and Vulnerability in Rural Zimbabwe: A Case Study of Care Interventions in the Zaka District, Masvingo. University of Johannesburg (South Africa).
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198296959.001.0001
DOI: 10.3763/cdev.2010.0060
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685637
DOI: 10.5751/ES-08748-210341
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-96-9063-3_3
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X05279903
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2014). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (C. B. Field et al., Eds.). Cambridge University Press.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC special report. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
DOI: 10.4135/9781849209779
DOI: 10.3389/fsrma.2026.1787880
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.002
DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2025.2517505
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-8616-4_9
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
DOI: 10.1017/wat.2024.8
DOI: 10.3390/w17070944
DOI: 10.1108/IJCCSM-07-2018-0055
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
DOI: 10.4102/jamba.v11i1.571
Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.3.1428
DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1543805
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-016-9861-0
DOI: 10.1016/j.crm.2017.03.003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.005
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01987-9
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1015078108
DOI: 10.1057/s41287-021-00410-3
Neubert, S., Kömm, M., & Krumsiek, A. (2013). Agricultural development in a changing climate in Zambia : increasing resilience to climate change and economic shocks in crop production. In. Hamburg: SUB Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky.
DOI: 10.1177/1609406917733847
DOI: 10.4102/jamba.v11i1.596
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12860
DOI: 10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100019
DOI: 10.1186/s44399-025-00005-x
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
DOI: 10.4324/9780203889046
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.012
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis (IDS Working Paper 72). Institute of Development Studies.
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-015-0910-2
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000697
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124744
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2344-5_4
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0246
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2015). The Paris Agreement. Available at: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement. Accessed on 23/08/2025
Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters (2nd ed.). New York. Routledge.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
DOI: 10.3390/w17101449