Examining gender laws to promote equality in Ekurhuleni primary school leadership
Joy Moyo · BJ Mthanti
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026 · Vol. 15 / Issue 4 · 480-488
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Gender inequality remains prevalent in leadership positions within South African schools. Previous research attributes this disparity to socio-cultural factors that hinder women's advancement into leadership roles. However, limited studies have examined the effectiveness of existing gender legislation in promoting equality. This article explores the role of gender legislation in fostering equitable school leadership in selected primary schools in Gauteng. Grounded in an emancipatory paradigm, the study adopts a qualitative approach to gain a comprehensive understanding of the issue. Key participants included the School Governing Bodies as stakeholders during the promotion of school managements, union representatives as observers in ensuring that gender policies are applied effectively, and the district officials involved in recruitment processes. Therefore, consisting of crucial members who play a crucial role in implementing gender legislation during leadership appointments. Data collection methods used in the study were obtained using semi-structured interviews and document analysis, which consisted of gender legislation applicable in the Department of Education. Data was analysed by means of thematic analysis. Findings indicated that the effectiveness of gender legislation largely depends on its implementers, who often fail to adhere to it. Additionally, women are frequently perceived as less effective in handling school disciplinary issues, a key criterion in principal selection, leading to male dominance in middle and senior management positions. The study recommends that the implementation of gender legislation be a collective responsibility of all stakeholders within the Education Department, rather than being left solely to selection panels, which may prioritise personal interests over equitable representation of leadership.
Keywords: {'name': 'leadership roles, gender inequality, female principals'}
Authors & affiliations
Joy Moyo
University of the Free State
BJ Mthanti
University of the Free State
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.24200/jonus.vol5iss1pp189-210
DOI: 10.22452/iojel.vol1no1.1
Ammerman, C., & Groysberg, B. (2021). How to close the gender gap. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/05/how-to-close-the-gender-gap
Andrew, S. (2020). How culture impacts our value of women. Forbes Coaches Council. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescoachescouncil/2020/04/06/how-culture-impacts-our-value-of-women/
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618250
Berik, G. (2022). Towards improved measures of gender inequality: An evaluation of the UNDP gender inequality index and a proposal. UN Women. https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/2022-11/Discussion-paper-Towards-improved-measures-of-gender-inequality-en.pdf
DOI: 10.5089/9781513546278.001
Bhandari, P. (2022). What is qualitative research? Methods & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/qualitative-research/
DOI: 10.1177/13684310211048116
BusinessTech. (2022). 4 changes coming for schools in South Africa. https://businesstech.co.za/news/government/569482/4-changes-coming-for-schools-in-south-africa/
DOI: 10.1080/18146627.2016.1264865
Davis, J. K., & Thilagaraj, A. (2022). Transformational leadership theory: A critical analysis with reference to the banking sector. Webology.
Eiland, C. (2022). Why women school principals matter. Noodle. https://www.noodle.com/articles/why-women-school-principals-matter
DOI: 10.24818/RMCI.2018.5.504
DOI: 10.1007/s10833-016-9291-7
DOI: 10.2991/icream-18.2019.18
Hariri, H., Rahman, B., Rini, R., & Saputra, B. (2022). Digital village document management training in Mataram Baru district. Journal Sinergi, 3(2), 67–78.
Harris, B. (2017). What is the gender gap (and why is it getting wider)? World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/11/the-gender-gap-actually-got-worse-in-2017/
Juhász, B., & Pap, E. (2018). Backlash in gender equality and women’s and girls’ rights. European Parliament.
Junnaid, M. H., Miralam, M. S., & Jeet, V. (2020). Leadership and organizational change management in unpredictable situations in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. Leadership, 11, Article 16.
DOI: 10.33225/pec/21.79.47
DOI: 10.1177/2158244019899085
Leonard, J. (2021). What are the psychological effects of gender inequality? Medical News Today. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/psychological-effects-of-gender-inequality
Mbiyozo, A. (2022). Gender inequality is forcing African women to face the storm. Institute for Security Studies. https://issafrica.org/iss-today/gender-inequality-is-forcing-african-women-to-face-the-storm
DOI: 10.4172/2471-2701.1000189
DOI: 10.5089/9798400224843.001
Shaturaev, J., & Bekimbetova, G. (2021). The difference between educational management and educational leadership and the importance of educational responsibility. InterConf.
Soken-Huberty, E. (2017). 10 causes of gender inequality. Human Rights Careers. https://www.humanrightscareers.com/issues/causes-gender-inequality/
South Africa. (1998). Employment Equity Act. Government Gazette.
South Africa. (1998). White paper on affirmative action in the public service. Government Printer.
South Africa. (2013). Women empowerment and gender equality bill. Government Printer.
South Africa. (2014). Gender equality and women empowerment policy. Gauteng Department of Education.
South Africa. (2017). Commission for gender equality. Government Printer.
South Africa. (2022). Circular 09 of 2022: Implementation of employment equity plan. Gauteng Department of Education.
South Africa. (2022). Vacancy circular 02 of 2022: Educator promotion post levels 2–4. Gauteng Department of Education.
Tarbutton, T. (2018). Leveraging 21st-century learning and technology to create caring, diverse classroom cultures. Multicultural Education, 25(2), 4–6.
UGM. (2021). The critical paradigm as a critic of status quo in society. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
United Nations. (2020). Progress on the sustainable development goals: The gender snapshot 2020. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/GenderSnapshot_2020.pdf
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100311
Wooll, M. (2021). Gender inequality in the workplace: The fight against bias. BetterUp. https://www.betterup.com/blog/gender-inequality-in-the-workplace