From anticipated regret to experienced regret: Evidence from a stock market simulation
Alain Finet ORCID ↗ · Kevin Kristoforidis · Julie Laznicka
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026 · Vol. 15 / Issue 4 · 302-315
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This study examines the determinants of post-simulation regret in a stock market exercise involving 133 second-year undergraduate management students. Using data from a four-hour trading simulation, it relates post-simulation regret to anticipated regret, portfolio return, trading-style indicators and personality traits. Five regression models are estimated with a common specification, each including a different proxy for trading style. The results show that anticipated regret is positively associated with post-simulation regret, while portfolio return is negatively related to regret and is significant or marginally significant across models. Conscientiousness also emerges as a significant positive predictor. By contrast, none of the trading-style proxies reaches standard significance levels. The findings suggest that regret in simulated trading is explained more by prior regret disposition, portfolio performance, and personality than by trading style.
Keywords: {'name': 'Anticipated regret; post-simulation regret; behavioral finance; portfolio performance; personality traits.'}
Authors & affiliations
Alain Finet
University of Mons
Kevin Kristoforidis
University of Mons
Julie Laznicka
University of Mons
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.139
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.047
DOI: 10.1097/00006842-200405000-00021
DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00226
DOI: 10.1162/003355301556400
DOI: 10.1287/opre.30.5.961
DOI: 10.1162/003355301556347
DOI: 10.1038/nn1514
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0473
DOI: 10.1002/job.720
DOI: 10.3390/risks13110209
DOI: 10.33423/jabe.v27i6.7944
DOI: 10.5430/ijfr.v16n3p74
DOI: 10.61351/mf.v4i1.487
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.003
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/14.1.1
DOI: 10.1007/s10713-007-0003-3
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01443.x
Hilgert, M. A., Hogarth, J. M., & Beverly, S. G. (2003). Household financial management: The connection between knowledge and behavior. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 89(7), 309–322.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.08.007
DOI: 10.1086/339925
DOI: 10.2307/1914185
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01411.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01483.x
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267
DOI: 10.2307/2232669
DOI: 10.61190/fsr.v17i3.4919
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.332
DOI: 10.1080/1366987032000123856
DOI: 10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00072
DOI: 10.1080/15427560.2017.1366495
DOI: 10.1017/S1930297500000486
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00287.x
DOI: 10.1037/a0029315
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199609)9:3<185::AID-BDM228>3.0.CO;2-5
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.133
DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.019
DOI: 10.1348/014466607X258704
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2007.03.002
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhp060
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05002.x
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhj032
DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2021.101706
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199906)12:2<93::AID-BDM311>3.0.CO;2-S
DOI: 10.1080/026999300402781