CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJRBSPUBLICATION RECORD

From anticipated regret to experienced regret: Evidence from a stock market simulation

Alain Finet ORCID ↗ · Kevin Kristoforidis · Julie Laznicka

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026 · Vol. 15 / Issue 4 · 302-315

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS0

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations0Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC

Mendeley · Readers—No verified count available

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

This study examines the determinants of post-simulation regret in a stock market exercise involving 133 second-year undergraduate management students. Using data from a four-hour trading simulation, it relates post-simulation regret to anticipated regret, portfolio return, trading-style indicators and personality traits. Five regression models are estimated with a common specification, each including a different proxy for trading style. The results show that anticipated regret is positively associated with post-simulation regret, while portfolio return is negatively related to regret and is significant or marginally significant across models. Conscientiousness also emerges as a significant positive predictor. By contrast, none of the trading-style proxies reaches standard significance levels. The findings suggest that regret in simulated trading is explained more by prior regret disposition, portfolio performance, and personality than by trading style. 

Keywords: {'name': 'Anticipated regret; post-simulation regret; behavioral finance; portfolio performance; personality traits.'}

Authors & affiliations

Alain Finet
University of Mons

Kevin Kristoforidis
University of Mons

Julie Laznicka
University of Mons

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.139

DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.047

DOI: 10.1097/00006842-200405000-00021

DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00226

DOI: 10.1162/003355301556400

DOI: 10.1287/opre.30.5.961

DOI: 10.1162/003355301556347

DOI: 10.1038/nn1514

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0473

DOI: 10.1002/job.720

DOI: 10.3390/risks13110209

DOI: 10.33423/jabe.v27i6.7944

DOI: 10.5430/ijfr.v16n3p74

DOI: 10.61351/mf.v4i1.487

DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.003

DOI: 10.1093/rfs/14.1.1

DOI: 10.1007/s10713-007-0003-3

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01443.x

Hilgert, M. A., Hogarth, J. M., & Beverly, S. G. (2003). Household financial management: The connection between knowledge and behavior. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 89(7), 309–322.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.08.007

DOI: 10.1086/339925

DOI: 10.2307/1914185

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01411.x

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01483.x

DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146

DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267

DOI: 10.2307/2232669

DOI: 10.61190/fsr.v17i3.4919

DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.332

DOI: 10.1080/1366987032000123856

DOI: 10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y

DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00072

DOI: 10.1080/15427560.2017.1366495

DOI: 10.1017/S1930297500000486

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00287.x

DOI: 10.1037/a0029315

DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199609)9:3<185::AID-BDM228>3.0.CO;2-5

DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.133

DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.019

DOI: 10.1348/014466607X258704

DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513

DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2007.03.002

DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhp060

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05002.x

DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhj032

DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2021.101706

DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199906)12:2<93::AID-BDM311>3.0.CO;2-S

DOI: 10.1080/026999300402781