CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJFBSPUBLICATION RECORD

A new measure of competition in Indian loan markets

Jugnu Ansari

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2013 · Vol. 2 / Issue 4 · 60-77

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS1

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:21 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations1Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:22 UTC

Mendeley · Readers—No verified count available

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

This study examines bank competition in the loan markets in India using a new competitiveness index, the Augmented Relative Profit Difference (ARPD). The ARPD quantifies the impact of marginal costs on performance, measured in terms of market shares. The theoretical foundation of the ARPD is robust when compared to other conventional measures. Applying this unbiased competition indicator to loan markets shows that financial reform has contributed to significant improvements in competition. Public sector banks and private sector banks are more competitive than foreign banks too. In addition, we find that the Indian loanmarkets are monopolistic in nature.

Keywords: {'name': 'Loan market'}, {'name': 'Competition'}, {'name': 'Marginal Cost'}, {'name': 'Banking Industry'}

Authors & affiliations

Jugnu Ansari
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Ansari, J. and Goyal, A., (2011). Competition in the Banking Sector and Monetary Transmission Mechanism: An

Empirical Analysis of Interest Rate Pass-through in India. Mimeo.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1306944

Relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120 (2): 701-728.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.995721

/65.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfi.2003.06.002

Journal of Financial Intermediation, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13(2), 205–248.

Baumol, W.J., J.C. Panzar, and R.D. Willing (1982). Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure, San

Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

DOI: 10.3386/w9921

Bank Concentration and Competition at the World Bank.

DOI: 10.2307/2077876

Hypothesis. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 27: 404–31.

DOI: 10.2307/1926975

Statistics, 71: 291–99.

DOI: 10.1016/0378-4266(92)90032-U

Journal of Banking and Finance,16: 909–32.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1073682

Banking Industry in India. MPRA Paper number 7463.

DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00205-4

Banking Industry. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 35: 2191–214.

DOI: 10.1080/00036840600949298

Economics, 40: 2063-2084.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.557821

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.985270

DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02168.x

DOI: 10.2307/2696372

DOI: 10.1016/0165-1765(82)90121-5

DOI: 10.1016/S1573-448X(89)02005-4

II, edited by Richard Schmalensee and Robert D. Willig, pp. 1011-1057.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.505982

DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00117-X

Sectors on the Eve of EMU. Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, 1045-1066.

Gruben, William C., and Robert P. McComb (2003). Privatization, Competition, and Super-competition in the

Mexican Commercial Banking System. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 229-249.

DOI: 10.1016/0378-4266(91)90042-K

Commercial Lending. Journal of Banking and Finance,15: 133–49.

Leuvensteijn, V, M., J.A. Bikker, A. van Rixtel, and C. Kok Sorensen (2007). A new approach to measure competition

in the loan markets of the euro area. ECB Working Paper Series No. 768.

DOI: 10.2307/135541

Canadian Journal of Economics, xxii(3): 576–94.

DOI: 10.1086/262040

Panzar, John C., and James N. Rosse (1982). Structure, Conduct and Comparative Statistics., Bell Laboratories

Economics Discussion Paper.

DOI: 10.2307/2098582

–56.

DOI: 10.3386/w4921

Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110: 407–43.

DOI: 10.5089/9781451861600.001

Reddy, Y.V. (2002). Public Sector Banks and the Governance Challenge: Indian Experience. RBI Bulletin, May, 337-

Shaffer, Sherrill (1982). A Non-structural Test for Competition in Financial Markets. In Bank Structure and

Competition. Conference Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, pp. 225-243.

Shaffer, Sherrill (1983). Non-structural Measures of Competition: Toward a Synthesis of Alternatives, Economic

Letters, 12, 349-353.

DOI: 10.1016/0165-1765(89)90210-3

DOI: 10.2307/2077819

DOI: 10.1016/S1062-9408(01)00041-9

Comparison. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 12, 79-104.

DOI: 10.1016/S1062-9769(01)00087-4

Hypothesis. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 42(3): 633–47.

DOI: 10.1257/aer.89.4.805

vol. 89 (4), 805–26.