Empirical evidence of employee engagement on productivity in a selected industrial packaging organisation in South Africa

Abstract

The decline in labour productivity in the South African manufacturing industry is a course for concern.  The majority of South Africans expect greater prosperity that can be achieved through greater employment and high productivity.  Thus, the industrial sector turns to employees for innovative productivity improvement initiatives.  This sentiment underpins the concept of employee engagement.  Hence, this study examines the effectiveness of employee engagement for productivity improvement in the selected industrial packaging organisation in South Africa.  Employee engagement is the degree of dedication and involvement an employee has towards his/her organisation.  The study was quantitative in design and examined production and the related experiences of the industrial packaging organisation that have adopted an employee engagement strategy for productivity improvement.  The Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) model, using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used to analyse data.  The company operates in the eThekwini Municipality in KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa.  The study was achieved by collecting pre- and post-quarterly data for the Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE), spoilage rate and labour productivity.  The results establish that employee engagement philosophy does not have a relationship with OEE and labour productivity.  However, it has an influence on the rate of spoilage.  The original value of this paper is its approach in uncovering strengths and weaknesses of employee engagement for productivity improvement in South Africa. This includes leadership engagement and the alignment of employee incentives with productivity goals.

Keywords: {'name': 'Employee Engagement, Overall Equipment Effectiveness, Productivity, South Africa; Spoilage'}

Authors & affiliations

Robert Walter Dumisani Zondo
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.5539/ass.v9n7p41

Amah, E. (2006). Human resource management. Amethyst Publishers.

DOI: 10.1108/JMD-09-2010-0064

DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0008

DOI: 10.5430/ijba.v4n2p46

Armstrong, M. (2010). Handbook of reward management practice. Kogan Page.

Baridam, D. M. (2001). Research methods in administrative sciences (3rd ed.). Sherbrooke Associates.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.174

Bersin, J. (2015). Becoming irresistible: A new model for employee engagement. Deloitte Insights. http://www.dupree.deloitte.com

Bhuvanaiah, T., & Raya, R. P. (2014). Employee engagement: Key to organisational success. Journal of Indian Management.

Blessing White. (2006). Employee engagement report. Blessing White.

Brewster, C., Carey, L., Dowling, P., Grobler, P., & Wärnich, S. (2003). Contemporary issues in human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage. Oxford University Press.

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Curwin, J., & Slater, R. (2002). Quantitative methods for business decisions (5th ed.). Thomson Learning.

Czarnowsky, M. (2008). Learning’s role in employee engagement: An ASTD research study. American Society for Training and Development.

Dulagil, A. (2012). The relationship of employee engagement and wellbeing to organisational and student outcomes. SBS HDR Student Conference.

Engagement. (2023). Kelly Rapid Talent Development. https://www.kelly.co.za

Farouk, I. (2014). Exploring employee attitude and productivity at Electrical Company of Ghana, Ashanti-East (BSc thesis, Human Resource Management).

Fleming, J. H., & Asplund, J. (2007). Human sigma. Gallup Press.

Fourie, D. (2008). An examination of an incentive system to maximize performance in an automobile manufacturing environment (Published master's thesis). Rhodes University, Grahamstown.

Gallup. (2016). Gallup Q12 employee engagement survey. http://www.q12.gallup.com

DOI: 10.4102/sajip.v40i1.1098

DOI: 10.1108/JOEPP-04-2014-0017

Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., Agrawal, S., & Plowman, S. K. (2013). The relationship between engagement at work and organisational outcomes. Gallup Research Journal, 1(3), 1–29.

DOI: 10.2307/256287

DOI: 10.4172/2167-0234.1000117

Kaur, S. (2013). 360-degree performance appraisal – Benefits and shortcomings. International Journal of Emerging Research in Management and Technology, 2(6), 83–88.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x

DOI: 10.1002/9781444306538

DOI: 10.1097/01974520-200907000-00003

McShane, S. L., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2003). Organisational behaviour: Emerging realities for the workplace revolution (2nd ed.). Irwin McGraw-Hill.

Parry, T., & Lacey, P. (2000). Promoting productivity and workforce effectiveness. Financial Executive, 16(6), 55–58.

Porkess, R. (2005). Collins internet-linked dictionary of statistics. HarperCollins.

SAinfo. (2008). South Africa’s automotive industry. http://www.southafrica.info/doing_business/economy/key_sectors/motorindustryboost.html

DOI: 10.1108/02683940610690169

DOI: 10.1177/1534484309353560

DOI: 10.1108/03090591111128306

States, A. (2008). The rage to engage. Time Magazine. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1731893,00.html

Stats SA. (2021). Improving lives through ecosystems: South African manufacturing production and the Rand. https://www.statssa.gov.za/ (accessed 27 May 2025). [Note: Add full URL if available.]

UNIDO. (2013). Sustaining employment growth: The role of manufacturing and structural change – Overview. Industrial Development Report 2013. United Nations Industrial Development Organization.

Vance, R. J. (2006). Employee engagement and commitment: A guide to understanding, measuring, and increasing engagement in your organisation. SHRM Foundation.

Wagner, R., & Harter, J. K. (2006). 12: The great elements of managing (Vol. 1). The Gallup Organization.

DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2010.07.003

Yin, R. K. (2008). Handbook of applied research. Sage.

DOI: 10.4102/sajems.v21i1.1773