What Makes Underwriting and Non-Underwriting Clients of Brokerage Firms Receive Different Recommendations?

Abstract

I explore company characteristics which explain the difference in analysts’ recommendations for companies that were underwritten (affiliated) versus non-underwritten (unaffiliated) by analysts’ brokerage firms. Prior literature documents that analysts issue more optimistic recommendations to underwriting clients of analysts’ brokerage employers. Extant research uses regression models to find general associations between recommendations and financial qualities of companies, with or without underwriting relationship. However, regression models cannot identify the qualities that cause the most difference in recommendations between affiliated versus unaffiliated companies. I adopt uplift random forest model, a popular technique in recent marketing and healthcare research, to identify the type of companies that earn analysts’ favor. I find that companies of stable earnings in the past, higher book-to-market ratio, smaller sizes, worsened earnings, and lower forward PE ratio are likely to receive higher recommendations if  they are affiliated with analysts than if they are unaffiliated with analysts. With uplift random forest model, I show that analysts pay more attention on price-related than earnings-related matrices when they value affiliated versus unaffiliated companies. This paper contributes to the literature by introducing an effective predictive model to capital market research and shedding additional light on the usefulness of analysts’ reports.

Keywords: {'name': 'Uplift Modeling'}, {'name': 'Analyst'}, {'name': 'Recommendation'}, {'name': 'Underwriting'}, {'name': 'Brokerage'}

Authors & affiliations

Shaowen Hua
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.11.001

DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00517

Bradshaw, M. T., & Sloan, R. G. (2000). The articulation of sell-side analysts' earnings forecasts, common stock valuations, and investment recommendations. University of Michigan..

DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.00010

DOI: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.4.1041

DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.09.001

Craig, S. and Weil, J. (2001). Despite losses, complex deals analysts remain high on Enron. The Wall Street Journal. C1. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1004043182760447600 .Last visited on January 23rd, 2016.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00869.x

DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00887-2

DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.00040

DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00244.x

DOI: 10.1007/s11142-011-9163-6

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04398.x

DOI: 10.2308/accr.2010.85.5.1617

DOI: 10.2307/2491271

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01336.x

DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2011.00417.x

DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00095-2

Guelman, L., Guillen, M., & Pérez-Marín, A. M. (2014). Optimal personalized treatment rules for marketing interventions: A review of methods, a new proposal, and an insurance case study (No. 2014-06).

DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00005-2

DOI: 10.2308/accr.2004.79.1.125

DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhl027

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00743.x

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00657.x

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00657.x

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.415580

Ke, B., & Yu, Y. (2007). The effect of ability, independence, and investor sentiment on analysts’ propensity to use their own earnings forecasts in stock recommendations. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University and University of Texas.

DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb04772.x

Lauricella, T. (2001). Analyst reports pressures of employer’s trading. The Wall Street Journal September 4. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB99955856910000000. Last accessed January 27th, 2016.

DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00016-0

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00837.x

DOI: 10.1145/772862.772872

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1675

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1675

DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhu009

DOI: 10.2307/2491460

DOI: 10.1093/rfs/12.4.653

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.09.007

Radcliffe, N. J., & Surry, P. D. (1999). Differential response analysis: Modeling true response by isolating the effect of a single action. Credit Scoring and Credit Control VI. Edinburgh, Scotland.

Radcliffe, N. J., & Surry, P. D. (1999). Differential response analysis: Modeling true response by isolating the effect of a single action. Credit Scoring and Credit Control VI. Edinburgh, Scotland.

DOI: 10.1007/s10618-014-0383-9

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04684.x

DOI: 10.2469/faj.v51.n5.1933

DOI: 10.3905/joi.2007.694759