Multinational Corporations and Stock Price Crash Risk
Anthony May · Rodney Boehme
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2016 · Vol. 5 / Issue 4 · 39-63
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:21 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:09 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:09 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
A nascent literature in finance and accounting on tail risk in individual stock returns concludes that bad news hoarding by corporate managers engenders sudden, extreme crashes in a firm’s stock price when the bad news is eventually made public. This literature finds that firm-specific crash risk is higher among firms with more severe asymmetric information and agency problems. A hitherto disjointed literature spanning the fields of international business, finance, and accounting suggests that geographic dispersion in a firm’s operations, and especially dispersion across different countries, gives rise to organizational complexities and greater costs of monitoring that can exacerbate asymmetric information and agency problems. Motivated by the confluence of arguments and findings from these two strands of literature, this paper examines whether stock price crash risk is higher among multinational firms than domestic firms. Using a large sample of U.S. headquartered firms during 1987-2011, we find robust evidence that multinational firms are significantly more likely to crash than domestic firms. Moreover, we show that the difference in crash risk between multinational and domestic firms is most acute among firms with weaker corporate governance mechanisms, including weaker shareholder rights, less independent boards, and less stable institutional ownership. Our analysis indicates that stronger monitoring from each of these three governance mechanisms significantly attenuates the positive relation between crash risk and multinationality. Our findings are robust to the use of alternative measures of crash risk and to controlling for known determinants of crash risk identified in prior studies. Our study offers new insights that should hold value for scholars and market participants interested in understanding the implications of heighted agency problems that multinational firms are likely to encounter and scholars and market participants interested in developing models that more accurately predict tail risk in the equity returns of individual firms.
Authors & affiliations
Anthony May
Affiliation not supplied
Rodney Boehme
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.01.001
DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.00020
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02749.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00325.x
DOI: 10.1257/aer.98.5.2066
Beasley, M. (1996). An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. Accounting Review 71, 443–465.
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhn099
DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12024
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhp041
DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(94)90038-8
DOI: 10.1257/aer.97.2.159
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490143
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.09.005
DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(92)90018-S
DOI: 10.1017/S0022109015000046
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.08.009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.02.018
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679x.2005.00175.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x
DOI: 10.2307/2551748
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00066-6
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.08.001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01795.x
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400003
DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12138
DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00485
DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(79)90013-8
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.12.006
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400203
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400014
DOI: 10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00056-6
DOI: 10.2308/accr.2002.77.2.415
DOI: 10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.61
DOI: 10.1016/j.finmar.2010.05.001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb00455.x
DOI: 10.2307/2327933
DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00896-3
DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2009.59
DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250100202
DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.00028
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490065
DOI: 10.1162/00335530360535162
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490413
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.05.016
DOI: 10.2307/2118431
DOI: 10.5465/256948
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.11.003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.08.005
DOI: 10.1177/0148558X0301800403
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.07.007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.02.013
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00059-9
Kogut, B. (1983). Foreign Direct Investment as a Sequential Process. The Multinational Corporation of the 1980s, edited by C. Kindelberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.40.1.123
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00318.x
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00017-3
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-646X.2008.01015.x
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490381
DOI: 10.1080/09638180701507155
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00914.x
DOI: 10.5465/20159604
DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2004.11.001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01259.x
DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12393
DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250130603
DOI: 10.1093/revfin/hhm011
DOI: 10.1086/296532
DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250150606
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00672.x
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00088-5
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00080-5
DOI: 10.1506/VANN-B7UB-GMFA-9E6W
DOI: 10.1108/03074350110767466
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400073
DOI: 10.5465/257100
DOI: 10.2307/256635
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4101(00)00007-0
DOI: 10.5465/30040614
DOI: 10.1111/jifm.12056
DOI: 10.2469/faj.v60.n3.2619
DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(88)90053-0
DOI: 10.1002/gsj.5
DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2016.42.3.114
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.01.006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.12.015