Identifying the Factors Influence Turkish Deposit Banks to Join Corporate Social Responsibility Activities by Using Panel Probit Method
Serhat Yuksel · Mustafa Ozsari
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2017 · Vol. 6 / Issue 1 · 39-50
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:21 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This study aims to determine the influencing factors of the banks to join corporate social responsibility activities. Within this scope, annual data of 23 deposit banks in Turkey for the periods between 2005 and 2015 was taken into the consideration. In addition to this situation, panel probit model was used in the analysis so as to achieve this objective. According to the results of the analysis, it was determined that there is a negative relationship between CSR activities and nonperforming loans ratio. This situation shows that banks do not prefer to make social responsibility activities in case of higher financial losses. In addition to this situation, it was also identified that there is a positive relationship between return on asset and corporate social responsibility activities of the banks. In other words, it can be understood that Turkish deposit banks, which have higher profitability, joint more CSR activities in comparison with others.
Keywords: {'name': 'CSR'}, {'name': 'banks'}
Authors & affiliations
Serhat Yuksel
Affiliation not supplied
Mustafa Ozsari
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO;2-3
DOI: 10.1108/17465680810852748
Adeyeye, P. O., & Migiro, S. O. (2015). An investigation on Nigerian banks’ status using early-warning signal. Banks and Bank Systems, 10(1), 42-53.
DOI: 10.1108/CG-04-2014-0044
DOI: 10.1108/14720700810879169
DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.67.2.76.18609
DOI: 10.1108/13563280610680821
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G., & Tsang, A. (2015). Voluntary External Assurance of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports and the Dow Jones Sustainability Index Membership: International Evidence. Unpublished working paper, UQ Business School.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.04.024
DOI: 10.1108/EMJB-01-2015-0003
DOI: 10.20525/ijdsa.v1i1.1415
Dusuki, A. W., & Dar, H. (2007). Stakeholders’ perceptions of corporate social responsibility of Islamic banks: Evidence from Malaysian economy. Islamic Economics and Fıinance, 249-277.
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2708589
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.107725
DOI: 10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80142-8
DOI: 10.3386/w17038
DOI: 10.1108/17590811111170539
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2038
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1996(96)01441-9
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.002
Gujarati, D. (1988). Basic Econometrics. McGraw Hill International Edition.
DOI: 10.1177/0272431699019002004
DOI: 10.3329/jbt.v10i2.29467
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2015.11018abstract
Harrington, A. R. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, globalization, the multinational corporation, and labor: an unlikely alliance. Alb. L. Rev., 75, 483-509.
DOI: 10.1108/17538391011072417
DOI: 10.1108/02652321011085176
DOI: 10.1002/smj.2268
Islam, Z. M., Ahmed, S. U., & Hasan, I. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance linkage: Evidence from the banking sector of Bangladesh. Journal of Organizational Management, 1(1), 14-21. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1999140
DOI: 10.1108/17471110910977276
DOI: 10.1108/IJBM-04-2015-0060
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00082-1
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2008.10.004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00277.x
Lins, K., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2015). DP10399 Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance during the Financial Crisis.
DOI: 10.1108/02652320810864643
DOI: 10.1016/S0922-1425(00)00038-4
Oktar, S., & Dalyancı, L. (2010). Finansal Kriz Teorileri ve Türkiye Ekonomisinde 1990 Sonrası Finansal Krizler. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 29(2), 1-22.
DOI: 10.14780/iibd.51360
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1979-5
DOI: 10.20547/jms.2014.1502203
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.024
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9841-x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00157.x
Singh, T. R. (2010). An ordered probit model of an early warning system for predicting financial crisis in India. IFC Bulletin, 25, 185.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.023
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2230-8
DOI: 10.20525/ijfbs.v4i4.35