What are the effects of demographic factors on employees’ resistance to change?

Abstract

The aim of the study is to investigate how employees' unwillingness to change is influenced by demographic factors (age, gender, and educational attainment). Employees at car dealerships in the eThekwini region of South Africa make up the statistical population of this study. The means of data collection was by administration of questionnaires distributed across 170 employees from selected dealership automobiles. Cronbach's Alpha was used to compute and confirm the questionnaire's reliability, while factor analysis and the KMO index were used to authenticate its validity. The results demonstrate employees' resistance to change in the cognitive rigidity dimension to be significantly influenced by the mean of the variables in the two groups of men and women. Employee resistance to change in the cognitive rigidity construct is unaffected by age, and employees with better educational backgrounds displayed less cognitive resistance than those with lesser educational backgrounds. The tenure of employment also indicated that those with more years of tenure showed less resistance compared to those with lesser years of the tenure at the organisation. The study suggests that these insights are valuable for organisations seeking to improve their change management practices by considering demographic factors as means to understand change is increasingly essential and promises more successful change efforts in the future.

Keywords: {'name': 'Age, Demographic factor, Gender, Educational qualifications, Resistance to change.'}

Authors & affiliations

Nonye Chukwuma
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2025.01.009

DOI: 10.7713/ijms.2013.0032

DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12555

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-12217-0_6

DOI: 10.1149/10701.19481ecst

DOI: 10.4324/9781003464464

DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1610864

DOI: 10.1108/JOCM-03-2023-0084

DOI: 10.4324/9781003135074

DOI: 10.1007/s10639-024-12662-7

DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101509

DOI: 10.63029/k7m8sj35

DOI: 10.52132/Ajrsp.e.2022.33.2

DOI: 10.1111/nin.12379

DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2020/14911

DOI: 10.1108/JSM-02-2020-0067

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.112903

DOI: 10.1017/S0003055422000752

DOI: 10.1177/00218863241284310

DOI: 10.17932/IAU.FCPE.2015.010/fcpe_v09i1004

DOI: 10.1108/JOCM-02-2023-0045

DOI: 10.21926/obm.geriatr.2303243

DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2023.2253861

DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i8.2962

DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i3.3216

DOI: 10.1177/00491241231156971

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2003). Business research methods. McGraw-Hill.

Cresswell, T. (2024). Geographic thought: A critical introduction. John Wiley & Sons.

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192866684.001.0001

DOI: 10.1108/JKM-10-2022-0779

DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2019.1557147

Dixon, L. (2022). The different perceptions of flexible work arrangements between Millennials and Generation X at work [Doctoral dissertation, National College of Ireland].

Dlamini-Gama, L. Z. (2021). The millennial employee: A catalyst for balanced workplace methods in a Local Government in Eswatini [Doctoral dissertation, University of Johannesburg].

DOI: 10.1177/21582440211008894

DOI: 10.1108/01437731011010371

DOI: 10.1007/s43032-022-01015-9

DOI: 10.19109/psikis.v10i2.24811

Fourie, R. (2023). Investigating the influence of academic staff's resistance to change regarding technology readiness: The mediating role of technology self-efficacy [Doctoral dissertation, North-West University].

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3890224

DOI: 10.1108/JMD-07-2023-0220

Gomez, E. C. (2024). Impact of values education in daily lives of students: A qualitative study. Southeast Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(1).

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-99-8925-6_6

Holbeche, L. (2023). The agile organization: How to build an engaged, innovative and resilient business. Kogan Page Publishers.

DOI: 10.3390/admsci13070162

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2021.101829

Imperatori, B. (2017). Engagement and disengagement at work: Drivers and organizational practices to sustain employee passion and performance. Springer.

DOI: 10.31014/aior.1992.04.01.331

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101331

Kawa, M. (2024). Generational attitudes toward organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management. Advance online publication.

Kotter, J. P., Akhtar, V., & Gupta, G. (2021). Change: How organizations achieve hard-to-imagine results in uncertain and volatile times. John Wiley & Sons.

Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2010). Practical research: Planning and design. Pearson.

DOI: 10.34306/att.v6i2.403

DOI: 10.1002/joe.22218

Linder, K. E. (2023). The business of innovating online: Practical tips and advice from industry leaders. Taylor & Francis.

DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2017.11.002

DOI: 10.61801/OUAESS.2021.1.85

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-9814-9.ch009

DOI: 10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100179

DOI: 10.1108/ICT-07-2024-0066

DOI: 10.1353/jda.2025.a952662

DOI: 10.1080/08841241.2020.1761931

Obeagu, E. I., & Obeagu, G. U. (2023). A review of knowledge, attitudes and socio-demographic factors associated with non-adherence to antiretroviral therapy among people living with HIV/AIDS. International Journal of Advance Research and Biological Science, 10(9), 135–142.

DOI: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0372

Ogunkoya, F. T. (2014). Socio-economic factors that affect livestock numbers: A case study of smallholder cattle and sheep farmers in the Free State province of South Africa [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa].

DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.680

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-022-05306-8

DOI: 10.2307/259206

Portillo, O. I. (2024). Leading change: Insights into change management for US startups [Doctoral dissertation, Capella University].

DOI: 10.1515/9780228010050

Rahman, M. M. (2023). Sample size determination for survey research and non-probability sampling techniques: A review and set of recommendations. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics, 11(1), 42–62.

Raines, S. (2023). Conflict management and leadership for managers: Knowledge, skills, and processes to harness the power of rapid change. Rowman & Littlefield.

DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2024.2311734

DOI: 10.17762/turcomat.v12i10.5742

Schroeder, C. (2023). Coming in from the margins: Faculty development’s emerging organizational development role in institutional change. Taylor & Francis.

DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12698

DOI: 10.1186/s40537-019-0170-y

Sharma, G. (2017). Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International Journal of Applied Research, 3(7), 749–752.

Sharma, U., & Rajput, B. (2021). Work engagement and demographic factors: A study among university teachers. Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research, 10(1), 25.

DOI: 10.1108/JOCM-10-2020-0332

Southall, C. M., & Gast, D. L. (2011). Self-management procedures: A comparison across the autism spectrum. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46(2), 155–171.

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020494

DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.12.014

DOI: 10.1108/JD-08-2020-0129

DOI: 10.1177/21582440221094606

DOI: 10.56315/PSCF12-23Twenge

DOI: 10.1017/9781108886901.005

DOI: 10.1037/sgd0000609

DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2022.09.001

Wellman, H. M., & Krueger, J. (2013). Phenomenology and the visibility of the mental. In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Consciousness and the Self (pp. 149–171). Springer.

DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.118939

Young, R., & Hsiang, S. (2024). Mortality caused by tropical cyclones in the United States. Nature, 631(8022), 585–591. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07548-2

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-022-05082-5