CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJFBSPUBLICATION RECORD

Value at Risk estimation using GAS models with heavy tailed distributions for cryptocurrencies

Stephanie Danielle Subramoney · Knowledge Chinhamu · Retius Chifurira

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2021 · Vol. 10 / Issue 4 · 40-54

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS1

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:21 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations2Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:22 UTC

Mendeley · Readers2Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 23:53 UTC

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

  Risk management and prediction of market losses of cryptocurrencies are of notable value to risk managers, portfolio managers, financial market researchers and academics. One of the most common measures of an asset’s risk is Value-at-Risk (VaR). This paper evaluates and compares the performance of generalized autoregressive score (GAS) combined with heavy-tailed distributions, in estimating the VaR of two well-known cryptocurrencies’ returns, namely Bitcoin returns and Ethereum returns. In this paper, we proposed a VaR model for Bitcoin and Ethereum returns, namely the GAS model combined with the generalized lambda distribution (GLD), referred to as the GAS-GLD model. The relative performance of the GAS-GLD models was compared to the models proposed by Troster et al. (2018), in other words, GAS models combined with asymmetric Laplace distribution (ALD), the asymmetric Student’s t-distribution (AST) and the skew Student’s t-distribution (SSTD). The Kupiec likelihood ratio test was used to assess the adequacy of the proposed models. The principal findings suggest that the GAS models with heavy-tailed innovation distributions are, in fact, appropriate for modelling cryptocurrency returns, with the GAS-GLD being the most adequate for the Bitcoin returns at various VaR levels, and both GAS-SSTD, GAS-ALD and GAS-GLD models being the most appropriate for the Ethereum returns at the VaR levels used in this study.    

Keywords: {'name': 'Cryptocurrency'}, {'name': 'GAS'}, {'name': 'Generalised Lambda Distribution'}, {'name': 'Value at Risk'}

Authors & affiliations

Stephanie Danielle Subramoney
Affiliation not supplied

Knowledge Chinhamu
Affiliation not supplied

Retius Chifurira
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2018.08.009

DOI: 10.32614/RJ-2018-064

Bouoiyour, J., Selmi, R., Tiwari, A., & Olayeni, O. (2016). What drives Bitcoin price? Economics Bulletin, 36, 843-850.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3028486

Chalabi Y., Scott, D.J., & Wuertz, D. (2012). Flexible distribution modelling with the generalized lambda distribution. MPRA Paper No. 43333.

DOI: 10.3390/jrfm10020012

DOI: 10.2307/2527341

DOI: 10.3390/jrfm10040017

DOI: 10.3390/jrfm11020023

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.248696

DOI: 10.1002/jae.1279

DOI: 10.3905/jod.1997.407971

DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2015.10.008

DOI: 10.2307/2999632

Jorion, P., (2000). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk.

DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.06.023

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0173-1

DOI: 10.3905/jod.1995.407942

DOI: 10.3905/jod.1995.407942

DOI: 10.20448/2002.11.71.75

DOI: 10.1016/S1574-0706(05)01016-5

DOI: 10.1145/360827.360840

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11460-6_22

DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.04.046

DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2018.09.014