The Market Impact of New Auditing Standards in China

Abstract

To improve audit reports' transparency and information content, China implemented new auditing standards in 2017.  The standards, which include disclosing key audit matters, were applied to A+H share companies in 2017 and A-share companies in 2018.  This paper uses A+H-share companies as the experimental group and A-share companies as the control group and applies the difference-in-differences method to test the market response to the new auditing standards.  We find a statistically significant positive cumulative abnormal return (CAR) during the report release event window for the A+H share companies.  The results indicate a greater investor reaction to the release of audit reports under the new standards implying that the audit reforms enhanced the information of the reports.  Furthermore, the positive CAR indicates that the reports reassured investors that the audit did not reveal significant problems or that existing weaknesses were addressed.  We also found a statistically insignificant difference in the volatility of stock prices during the event window for the experimental and control group. 

Keywords: {'name': 'Audit Reports'}, {'name': 'Key Audit Matters'}, {'name': 'Information Content'}, {'name': 'New Auditing Standards'}, {'name': 'Stock Price Volatility'}

Authors & affiliations

Xiancong Wu
Affiliation not supplied

Richard Skolnik
Affiliation not supplied

Hongxiu Luo
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1111/ijau.12255

DOI: 10.2308/ajpt-52339

DOI: 10.2308/accr-51380

DOI: 10.1007/s11142-007-9032-5

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2930375

DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00066-6

DOI: 10.2308/ajpt-50793

DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002

Financial Reporting Council (FRC). (2013). International Standard on Auditing (UK and Ireland) 700: The independent auditor’s report on financial statements. London: Financial Reporting Council. Retrieved from https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/501de004-b616-43c3-8d65-aeaebde19f8d/ISA-700-(UK-and-Ireland)-700-(Revised)-Independent-auditors-report-June-2013.pdf

DOI: 10.2308/accr-51382

DOI: 10.5117/mab.93.29496

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.003

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2015. Auditor reporting–Key audit matters. New York, NY: International Federation of Accountants. Retrieved from https://www.ifac.org/publications-resources/auditor-reporting-key-audit-matters

Jermakowicz, E. K., Epstein, B. J., & Ramamoorti, S. (2018). CAM versus KAM-A distinction without a difference?: Making judgments in reporting critical audit matters: Certified public accountant. The CPA Journal, 88(2), 34-40.

DOI: 10.1590/1808-057x201908910

Katz, D. M. (2014). Nothing if not critical: a proposal to require auditors of public companies to disclose “critical audit matters” in their reports has generated apprehension among audit firms and pushback from CFOs. CFO, The Magazine for Senior Financial Executives, 30(5), 28.

DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2020.1726420

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2619785

Ministry of Finance of the Peoples’ Republic of China (2016), Notice on the issuance of 12 standards including the “Chinese Certified Public Accountants Auditing Standards No. 1504 -Communicating Key Audit Matters in Audit Reports”, http://www.mof.gov.cn/zhengwuxinxi/zhengcefabu/201612/t20161229_2507976.htm

DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2020.1733040

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2013) Proposed auditing standards—the auditor’s report on an audit of financial statements when the auditor expresses an unqualified opinion. PCAOB Release No. 2013-005.

DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12486

DOI: 10.2308/acch-52047

DOI: 10.5089/9781513583709.001

Tysiac, K. (2014). Preparers oppose PCAOB’s plan for more auditor disclosures. Journal of accountancy. 1, 3. https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/news/2014/jan/20149360.html