CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJFBSPUBLICATION RECORD

Effects of the ECL Model on Regulatory Capital in European Banks

Manuela Rodrigues Boscia · José Alves Dantas · Vitor Leone · Herbert Kimura

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2022 · Vol. 11 / Issue 3 · 01-13

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS1

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:21 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations2Cached provider observation

Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:22 UTC

Mendeley · Readers9Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 23:03 UTC

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

The paper’s purpose was to assess whether the effects on the regulatory capital of the ECL model in European banks differs among those that adopted IRB or standardized approaches to credit risk management. The empirical tests revealed that there was a significant reduction in the level of capita buffers of European banks when the IFRS 9 was first adopted, and that this reduction was more pronounced among banks using a standardized approach to credit risk than for those that relied on an IRB approach. Further testing confirmed the premise that there was an underestimation of capital requirements in the period prior to the adoption of the ECL. The study fills a gap in literature, by evaluating the difference in the impact of adopting the ECL model on the banking system, as a function of the credit risk management approach for capital purposes. The assessment of what happened in the European banking system can be used as a guidance to other jurisdictions still in transition to the ECL model.

Keywords: {'name': 'IFRS9'}, {'name': 'ECL'}, {'name': 'IRB Approach'}, {'name': 'Banks'}, {'name': 'Regulatory capital'}

Authors & affiliations

Manuela Rodrigues Boscia
Affiliation not supplied

José Alves Dantas
Affiliation not supplied

Vitor Leone
Affiliation not supplied

Herbert Kimura
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.08.035

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2699691

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfs.2010.05.001

DOI: 10.1016/S1042-9573(03)00044-5

DOI: 10.1007/s11142-017-9426-y

DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2010.498619

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). (2005). An explanatory note on the Basel II IRB risk weght function. Basel: Bank for International Settlements, 2005. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/bcbs/irbriskweight.pdf

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). (2011). Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems. Basel: Bank for International Settlements, 2011. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs189.pdf

DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.08.009

DOI: 10.1057/s41261-017-0058-8

DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2004.03.004

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3393148

DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2007.07.004

DOI: 10.1590/1808-057x202010400

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0999-8_19

DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2012.762408

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1739690

European Banking Authority (EBA). (2017). Opinion of the Europena Banking Authority on transitional arrangements and credit risk adjustments due to the introduction of IFRS 9. Retrieved from https://eba.europa.eu/eba-publishes-opinion-on-transitional-arrangements-and-credit-risk-adjustments-due-to-the-introduction-of-ifrs-9

European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB). (2017). Financial Stability Implications of IFRS 9. Retrieved from https://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/reports/20170717_fin_stab_imp_IFRS_9.en.pdf

DOI: 10.1093/rof/rfm007

Floro, D. (2010). Loan loss provisioning and the business cycle: Does capital matter? Evidence from Philippine banks. Bank for International Settlements. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/repofficepubl/arpresearch201003.07.pdf

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.09.020

Francis, W., & Osborne, M. (2009). Bank regulation, capital and credit supply: measuring the impact of prudential standards. Occasional paper, 36. Retrived from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.556.2475&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Gujarati, D., & Porter, D. C. (2011) Econometria Básica. 5th ed. New York: AMGH

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfi.2006.03.001

DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2016.1210180

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2038215

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.04.006

DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2019.101076

DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2019.101076

Sanchidrián, J. P., & García, C. J. R. (2019). Unveiling the Expected Loss Model in IFRS 9 and Circular 4/2017. Estabilidad Financiera, 6, 147-164. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bde/revist/y2019ispringn36.html

Seitz, B. (2019). From IAS 39 to IFRS 9: Accounting of Financial Instruments in the European Banking Industry. [Doctoral dissertation, University of St. Gallen]

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfs.2009.09.001