Effects of the ECL Model on Regulatory Capital in European Banks
Manuela Rodrigues Boscia · José Alves Dantas · Vitor Leone · Herbert Kimura
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2022 · Vol. 11 / Issue 3 · 01-13
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:21 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 23:03 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The paper’s purpose was to assess whether the effects on the regulatory capital of the ECL model in European banks differs among those that adopted IRB or standardized approaches to credit risk management. The empirical tests revealed that there was a significant reduction in the level of capita buffers of European banks when the IFRS 9 was first adopted, and that this reduction was more pronounced among banks using a standardized approach to credit risk than for those that relied on an IRB approach. Further testing confirmed the premise that there was an underestimation of capital requirements in the period prior to the adoption of the ECL. The study fills a gap in literature, by evaluating the difference in the impact of adopting the ECL model on the banking system, as a function of the credit risk management approach for capital purposes. The assessment of what happened in the European banking system can be used as a guidance to other jurisdictions still in transition to the ECL model.
Keywords: {'name': 'IFRS9'}, {'name': 'ECL'}, {'name': 'IRB Approach'}, {'name': 'Banks'}, {'name': 'Regulatory capital'}
Authors & affiliations
Manuela Rodrigues Boscia
Affiliation not supplied
José Alves Dantas
Affiliation not supplied
Vitor Leone
Affiliation not supplied
Herbert Kimura
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.08.035
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2699691
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfs.2010.05.001
DOI: 10.1016/S1042-9573(03)00044-5
DOI: 10.1007/s11142-017-9426-y
DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2010.498619
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). (2005). An explanatory note on the Basel II IRB risk weght function. Basel: Bank for International Settlements, 2005. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/bcbs/irbriskweight.pdf
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). (2011). Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems. Basel: Bank for International Settlements, 2011. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs189.pdf
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.08.009
DOI: 10.1057/s41261-017-0058-8
DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2004.03.004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3393148
DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2007.07.004
DOI: 10.1590/1808-057x202010400
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0999-8_19
DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2012.762408
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1739690
European Banking Authority (EBA). (2017). Opinion of the Europena Banking Authority on transitional arrangements and credit risk adjustments due to the introduction of IFRS 9. Retrieved from https://eba.europa.eu/eba-publishes-opinion-on-transitional-arrangements-and-credit-risk-adjustments-due-to-the-introduction-of-ifrs-9
European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB). (2017). Financial Stability Implications of IFRS 9. Retrieved from https://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/reports/20170717_fin_stab_imp_IFRS_9.en.pdf
DOI: 10.1093/rof/rfm007
Floro, D. (2010). Loan loss provisioning and the business cycle: Does capital matter? Evidence from Philippine banks. Bank for International Settlements. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/repofficepubl/arpresearch201003.07.pdf
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.09.020
Francis, W., & Osborne, M. (2009). Bank regulation, capital and credit supply: measuring the impact of prudential standards. Occasional paper, 36. Retrived from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.556.2475&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Gujarati, D., & Porter, D. C. (2011) Econometria Básica. 5th ed. New York: AMGH
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfi.2006.03.001
DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2016.1210180
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2038215
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.04.006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2019.101076
DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2019.101076
Sanchidrián, J. P., & García, C. J. R. (2019). Unveiling the Expected Loss Model in IFRS 9 and Circular 4/2017. Estabilidad Financiera, 6, 147-164. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bde/revist/y2019ispringn36.html
Seitz, B. (2019). From IAS 39 to IFRS 9: Accounting of Financial Instruments in the European Banking Industry. [Doctoral dissertation, University of St. Gallen]
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfs.2009.09.001