The Simultaneous Effect Dividend Policy and Debt Policy
Esih Jayanti · Najmudin · Ika Yustina Rahmawati · Yuni Utami · Yulis Maulida Berniz
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2023 · Vol. 12 / Issue 2 · 76-86
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:21 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:56 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:56 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This study aims to examine dividend policies for companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2018-2022 period. Agency theory argues that dividend policy can reduce agency costs and reduce agency conflicts. The percentage of institutional ownership is used as a proxy for agency costs and can be used as a mechanism for lowering agency conflict. The total sample is 44 companies listed on the IDX. The estimation uses the pooling data method and 3SLS. This research develops a simultaneous system econometric model. This study argues that high institutional ownership leads to higher agency conflict, as management and institutions collaborate to prioritize their interests over other shareholders. Conversely, low institutional ownership leads to disputes between management, low institutional, and public shareholders. The entrenchment argument predicts higher conflict in high institutional ownership, while the convergence argument predicts common agency conflict in common institutional ownership.
Keywords: {'name': 'Agency Costs'}, {'name': 'Institutional Ownership'}, {'name': 'Dividend Policy'}, {'name': 'Debt Policy'}, {'name': 'Entrenchment Arguments'}, {'name': 'Convergence Arguments'}
Authors & affiliations
Esih Jayanti
Affiliation not supplied
Najmudin
Affiliation not supplied
Ika Yustina Rahmawati
Affiliation not supplied
Yuni Utami
Affiliation not supplied
Yulis Maulida Berniz
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
No reference list supplied.