Leadership Styles and Performance of Agro-Processing Projects
Uwingeneye Josiane · Amolo Elvis Juma Amolo
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2025 · Vol. 14 / Issue 1 · 149-156
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:21 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The leadership of the agro-processing project entails applying leadership abilities, understanding of agriculture, and project management concepts to meet the project's goals while catering to the interests of stakeholders. Nevertheless, numerous agro-processing initiatives encounter financial and resource limitations, human resource management difficulties, technological and knowledge deficiencies, and leadership and decision-making hurdles. The research aimed to evaluate the influence of leadership styles of Laissez-Faire, Transformational and Transactional Leadership approach on performance of Agro-processing Projects in Musanze District, Rwanda. The research was based on Resource-Based View (RBV) theory. The research employed descriptive survey and correlational research methodologies. Structured questionnaires and interview guides were utilized to gather both quantitative and qualitative data from 208 participants, chosen using a mix of stratified, random, and purposive sampling, from a target population of 433 stakeholders involved in the SPF agricultural development initiative. The pilot study sought to improve the validity and reliability of the research instruments by pre-testing the questionnaire and interview guide on 21 participants, representing 10% of the sample size. Validity was verified via expert assessment, resulting in a content validity index of 0.76, while reliability was determined through the split-half method, attaining a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.90, indicating the instruments' reliability and suitability for data collection. Descriptive statistics including percentage, frequency, mean, and standard deviation, along with inferential statistics such as correlation and regression, were performed at a significance level of 0.05 using Stata/MP 13.0, while thematic content analysis of qualitative data was conducted for triangulation purposes. The results for three hypotheses were examined at an ? = 0.05 significance level, yielding the following outcomes: laissez-faire leadership (P = 0.000<0.05), transformational leadership (P = 0.000<0.05) and, transactional leadership (P = 0.000<0.05) does not significantly affect performance were all rejected. The research findings indicate that agricultural initiatives have greatly benefited from the adoption of improved leadership approaches specifically laissez-faire, transformational, and transactional to guarantee successful project execution and sustainability. It is suggested that the SPF project focus on inclusive leadership styles such as laissez-faire, transformational, and transactional to maintain success, while also investing in the training of their employees, particularly their project managers, inspiring workers, continuing to blend these leadership styles, and collaborating with research institutions for a promising future and advancement. Future studies ought to emphasize qualitative insights and long-term effects, exploring the impact of community participation, assessing the financial sustainability of agro-processing initiatives, and analyzing the consequences of climate change.
Keywords: {'name': 'Leadership Styles, Laissez-Faire Leadership, Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Performance of Agro-Processing Projects'}
Authors & affiliations
Uwingeneye Josiane
Affiliation not supplied
Amolo Elvis Juma Amolo
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
No reference list supplied.