Evaluating the Impact of Monitoring and Evaluation Approaches on Agricultural Insurance Performance
Adolphe, Rusangwa · Amolo, Amolo Elvis Juma
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2026 · Vol. / Issue · 49-58
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed Not yet retrieved
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The study was directed by the following specific objectives: (i) to examine the impact of the result-based approach on the performance of the National Agriculture Insurance Scheme, and (ii) to analyze the effect of the participatory approach on the performance of the scheme, and (iii) to investigate the role of the reflexive approach in enhancing the program’s outcomes. The theoretical framework drew on decision-making theory, agricultural insurance theory, and contingency theory. The target group for this study comprises roughly 1,463 people. From this group, a stratified sampling technique was been employed to select 313 respondents. Information for the research obtained via questionnaires, interviews, and document analysis, including monthly district reports. The instruments were pilot-tested, resulting in a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.94, which confirms strong reliability. Data analysis involved descriptive and inferential statistics, specifically correlation and regression at a 0.05 significance level, with the assistance of SPSS Version 28. Ethical standards was upheld by securing informed consent from participants and ensuring the confidentiality of all responses.
Authors & affiliations
Adolphe, Rusangwa
Affiliation not supplied
Amolo, Amolo Elvis Juma
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
No reference list supplied.