Whose Readiness, Whose Reality? Decolonising the E-Assessment Agenda in Rural Higher Education
Sympathy Luyanda Mncube ORCID ↗
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026 · Vol. 8 / Issue 6 · 619-629
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed Not yet retrieved
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
Annual citation history is not available for this article yet. No annual values have been assumed to be zero.
Annual history last updated: not yet retrieved. The history is fetched with OpenAlex metrics on eligible article visits and during the scheduled OpenAlex refresh.
Abstract
The rapid expansion of electronic assessment (e-assessment) in higher education is frequently presented as a pathway to innovation, efficiency, and improved learning outcomes. However, within rural higher education contexts, the shift towards digital assessment raises critical questions about whose interests these systems ultimately serve. This paper interrogates the growing e-assessment agenda through a decolonial lens, examining the tension between learning enhancement and digital surveillance. It argues that many e-assessment frameworks are underpinned by assumptions of technological readiness, reliable connectivity, and digital competence that do not reflect the lived realities of many rural institutions and their students. Furthermore, the increasing use of online proctoring, learning analytics, and artificial intelligence-driven monitoring risks transforming assessment from a pedagogical process into a mechanism of surveillance and control. Drawing on decolonial scholarship, digital justice perspectives, and literature on educational technology adoption, the paper contends that the challenge is not merely technological but epistemological and political. It calls for contextually responsive and socially just assessment approaches that prioritise learning, equity, and student dignity over compliance and monitoring. Ultimately, the paper questions whether current e-assessment practices are preparing students for learning or conditioning them for surveillance in digitally mediated educational environments.
Keywords: {'name': 'E-assessment'}, {'name': 'Digital Surveillance'}, {'name': 'Decolonisation'}, {'name': 'Rural Higher Education'}
Authors & affiliations
Sympathy Luyanda Mncube
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
No reference list supplied.