The constitutional imperative of consultation in South Africa: Examining the executive's role in policy formulation and the challenge of "stealth taxation"
Vuyani Goodman Langa · Sanjay Balkaran ORCID ↗
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026 · Vol. 7 / Issue 6 · 171-177
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This study considers the constitutional requirement of public consultation in South Africa in light of the role of the executive in policy-making as well as the emerging trend of "stealth taxation." This work critically evaluates how the executive, availing itself of the cover of budget-making and regulatory power, has a tendency to introduce fiscal devices with minimal public or parliamentary engagement. This conduct raises alarming questions of constitutional compliance, transparency, and abnegation of democratic accountability. The research employs a doctrinal legal approach to examining pertinent constitutional provisions, leading cases, and administrative law principles. Comparative analysis is employed by resorting to similar practice and judicial standards applicable in other Commonwealth jurisdictions. Parliament records and fiscal policy papers from 2010 to 2023 are consulted to recognize and assess examples of indirect taxation evading substantive public participation. The findings exhibit a growing pattern of executive overreach through fiscal means that are neither transparent during deliberation nor scrutinized by the National Assembly. All these actions go against constitutional mandates, particularly those listed in sections 59 and 195, aimed at participatory democracy as well as good governance. The study indicates that consultation is not procedural courtesy but substantive constitutional imperative at the heart of democratic rule. This study significantly adds to demystifying the legal boundaries of executive discretion in fiscal matters. It calls for a normative approach to deliver stronger judicial control and procedural safeguards. The research highlights that the strengthening of public procedure for participation is crucial to safeguard parliamentary predominance as well as to advance credibility of tax policy within South Africa's constitutional framework.
Keywords: {'name': 'Constitutional Law, Consultation, Executive Power, Fiscal Policy, Stealth Taxation, South Africa, Participatory Democracy, Legislative Oversight'}
Authors & affiliations
Vuyani Goodman Langa
Walter Sisulu University
Sanjay Balkaran
Walter Sisulu University
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
No reference list supplied.