CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / BRSSPUBLICATION RECORD

The conflict between Apple and Samsung over patents and copyrights

Hani Albasoos · Nabil Al Musallami

Bussecon Review of Social Sciences · 2020 · Vol. 2 / Issue 3 · 1-17

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS3

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:01 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations4Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:01 UTC

Mendeley · Readers—No verified count available

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

This article seeks to explore the conflict between Samsung and Apple. The conflict has been one of the most outstanding patent wars in the history of the smartphone industry. Apple and Samsung are among the most popular manufacturers of commonly used smartphones and tablets. The conflict began when Apple decided to file a federal lawsuit in the US district court, accusing Samsung of copying some of its iPhone features in the Samsung Galaxy S II smartphone. The court ascertained that the gadget had similar characteristics to Apple, thus ordering Samsung to pay Apple for the damages. In response, Samsung reacted by filing countersuits. The two firms, almost fifty cases in different nations and regions. The issues lasted for seven years, starting from 2011 and ending in 2016, in which both companies benefited and lost at the same time. The conflict emanated because of each firm pursuing its competitive advantage in the market. Apart from following market shares, third parties, like consumers, instigated the conflict, with international politics and the media playing a role.

Keywords: {'name': 'Samsung, Apple, Intellectual Property, Copyright, Patent, Conflict.'}

Authors & affiliations

Hani Albasoos
Affiliation not supplied

Nabil Al Musallami
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Burnick, S. (2017). The importance of the design patent to modern-day technology: The Supreme Court’s decision to narrow the damages clause in Samsung v. Apple. North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, 18(5), 283.

Cardoso, E., 2017. Examining the differences of the internationalization strategies of two of the major brands in the smartphone industry-Apple inc. versus Samsung electronics. Ph.D. diss., 1(1), 1-15.

Coughlin, T. (2016). Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.: Economics of design patent trolling. Cardozo Arts & Ent. LJ, 35, 209.

Dordick, S. B. (2015). Lay Jurors: The true casualties of the Apple v. Samsung smartphone patent Wars. Temp. Int'l & Comp. LJ, 29, 239.

Gil, E. M. (2016). Samsung v. Apple: Taking a bite out of the design patent article of manufacture controversy. U. Miami Bus. L. Rev., 25, 67.

Han, Y. W., 2016. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. v Apple Inc. 137 S. Ct. 429 (Dec. 6, 2016)-Overview of the design patent lawsuit between Samsung & Apple. Northeast Asian Law Review.

Jie, C. T., & Hasan, N. A. M. (2017). Apple Versus Samsung patent lawsuit: An issue and crisis management approach. International Journal, 2(5), 1-12.

Kang, T. (2018). Samsung v. Apple: The ill-fated introduction of apportionment-by-component for designs. Berkeley Tech. LJ, 33, 889.

DOI: 10.1108/JCOM-10-2013-0072

Kim, P., 2018. Integration of Management and Culture: The Culture of Dedication in Samsung Electronics and Apple Inc. PhD diss., ????? ???, 1(1), 1-15.

DOI: 10.1177/1748048518767789

DOI: 10.1109/WEEF-GEDC.2018.8629755

DOI: 10.5465/AMBPP.2020.19011abstract

DOI: 10.1145/2935878

Sim, S., 2017. A Comparative Study of Trade Dress in the US and South Korea: Rethinking on the Laws and Precedents in the Apple v. Samsung. 1(1), 1-15.

DOI: 10.1007/s11628-019-00405-5