How does board diversity impact a company’s financial performance? A preliminary literature review
Esra Findik
Bussecon Review of Social Sciences · 2021 · Vol. 3 / Issue 2 · 01-09
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:01 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:01 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Countries’ policy changes on improvement of female representation in board is in the spotlight of many researchers. In this paper studies current literature in board diversity, not specifically in gender but also ethnic, educational and cultural diversities, has been examined through their methodologies and findings. This study provides a summary of empirical findings of necessary papers in this field and try to assist researchers who are interested in this issue during their preliminary research.
Keywords: {'name': 'Gender diversity; Board diversity; Financial Performance'}
Authors & affiliations
Esra Findik
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1572283
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00600.x
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y
DOI: 10.1111/1540-6288.00034
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.972763
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00809.x
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1785-0
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2748558
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1907103
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8683.00011
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9482-5
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0066
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2817642
Google scholar Web page, (2020). Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com.tr/
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2343-0
Heidrick and Struggles (2014). Towards Dynamic Governance 2014. European Corporate Governance Report(Retrieved on 02.01.2020). https://www.heidrick.com/~/media/Publications%20and%20Reports/European-Corporate-Governance-Report-2014-Towards-Dynamic-Governance.pdf
Heidrick and Struggles (2019). Board Monitor Europe 2019. CEO and Board Practice(Retrieved on 02.01.2020). https://www.heidrick.com/Knowledge-Center/Publication/Board_Monitor_Europe_2019
DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-0973-z
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00839.x
DOI: 10.1515/stcb-2016-0009
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130005
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2013.0319
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00570.x
Scopus Web Page, (2020). Retrieved from https://blog.scopus.com/posts/citescore-2018-metrics-now-available
DOI: 10.1108/14720701211275587
DOI: 10.1111/auar.12068
DOI: 10.1016/j.brq.2017.04.001
DOI: 10.1002/joe.22135