Allocation of resources for risk management activities by business organisations in developing countries: Evidence from Zambia
Peter Silwimba ORCID ↗ · Olajide Solomon Fadun ORCID ↗
Bussecon Review of Social Sciences · 2023 · Vol. 4 / Issue 2 · 15-24
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:01 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:51 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 23:02 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This study evaluates resources allocated for risk management by business organisations (financial and non-financial firms) in developing countries, using Zambia as a case study. Primary data collected from 158 organisations were analysed using MegaStat. The findings revealed that the majority (54.5%) of organisations, especially non-financial institutions, only commit resources to risk mitigation on an Adhoc or post-event basis, while 45.5% showed a budgeted approach. A significant part of the budgeted 45.5% was used for risk management activities, and 54.5% was used for regular daily operations. Despite this variation, all organisations engaged reported a significant expenditure on risk management, at least on Adhoc. At 4 degrees of freedom (df), which was one less than the total number of possible outcomes, a non-parametric test for significance yielded a scientific P-value of 1.57e-0.7, (a numerical magnitude of 0.0014, P< 0.05). This suggests that the correlation and pattern of the findings were not random or by chance, but they carried a statistical significance. The study's main findings demonstrate that some business organisations in Zambia and other developing countries incur significant expenditure with a higher portion of their budgets to respond to risk management needs. Business organisations which do not have formal risk structures do so informally due to pressure from emerging business risks. The findings also indicated that financial institutions in developing countries allocate more resources towards risk management than non-financial institutions. The Phi coefficient (degree of association) was 0.486, showing a moderately significant relationship between the variables (risk management and resource allocation). Business organisations in Zambia and other developing nations must develop sound risk mitigation plans and allocate resources for risk management.
Keywords: {'name': 'Risk management, Risk Resource Allocation, Zambia, Developing Countries'}
Authors & affiliations
Peter Silwimba
Affiliation not supplied
Olajide Solomon Fadun
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.14299/ijser.2018.02.005
DOI: 10.24912/ja.v26i1.821
DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2008.01.002
DOI: 10.1177/0148558X19850424
DOI: 10.1111/risa.13803
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-95527-4_2
DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.08.001
Fadun, O. S. (2013). Promoting enterprise risk management adoption in business enterprises: Implications and challenges. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 2(1), 69-78.
DOI: 10.20525/ijfbs.v9i1.634
DOI: 10.36096/brfb.v2i2.194
DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2021.2009090
DOI: 10.1111/jori.12035
DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2016.08.003
DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2016.06.007
Gallati, R. R. (2022). Risk management and capital adequacy. London: McGraw-Hill.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2009.06.006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03747.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6975.2011.01413.x
DOI: 10.1108/CG-02-2018-0092
DOI: 10.1108/CG-02-2018-0092
DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-95376-8_3
DOI: 10.1111/jacf.12155
DOI: 10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc041
DOI: 10.12968/nuwa.2019.10.30
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2311293
DOI: 10.3390/risks10090173
Musonda, K. (2020). A critical analysis of the internal risk management practices of the commercial banks in Zambia: A case study of the Zambia National Commercial Bank. Lusaka: Cavendish University.
Mwila, B. (2018). Disaster risk preparedness strategies against fire in urban markets in Zambia: a case study of Chisokone market in Kitwe (Doctoral dissertation).
DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-03-2021-0131
Penrose, E. T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
DOI: 10.1002/jcaf.22346
DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2018.1460723
DOI: 10.1590/0104-530x2315-19
DOI: 10.2307/2330757
DOI: 10.2307/3666152
Tursoy, T. (2018). Risk management process in the banking industry. Near East London: Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA).
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32430-8_3
DOI: 10.31920/The_Effect_of_the_Enterprise_Risk_Management
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002392