CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / BRSSPUBLICATION RECORD

Allocation of resources for risk management activities by business organisations in developing countries: Evidence from Zambia

Peter Silwimba ORCID ↗ · Olajide Solomon Fadun ORCID ↗

Bussecon Review of Social Sciences · 2023 · Vol. 4 / Issue 2 · 15-24

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS1

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:01 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations1Cached provider observation

Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:51 UTC

Mendeley · Readers10Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 23:02 UTC

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

This study evaluates resources allocated for risk management by business organisations (financial and non-financial firms) in developing countries, using Zambia as a case study. Primary data collected from 158 organisations were analysed using MegaStat. The findings revealed that the majority (54.5%) of organisations, especially non-financial institutions, only commit resources to risk mitigation on an Adhoc or post-event basis, while 45.5% showed a budgeted approach. A significant part of the budgeted 45.5% was used for risk management activities, and 54.5% was used for regular daily operations. Despite this variation, all organisations engaged reported a significant expenditure on risk management, at least on Adhoc. At 4 degrees of freedom (df), which was one less than the total number of possible outcomes, a non-parametric test for significance yielded a scientific P-value of 1.57e-0.7, (a numerical magnitude of 0.0014, P< 0.05). This suggests that the correlation and pattern of the findings were not random or by chance, but they carried a statistical significance. The study's main findings demonstrate that some business organisations in Zambia and other developing countries incur significant expenditure with a higher portion of their budgets to respond to risk management needs. Business organisations which do not have formal risk structures do so informally due to pressure from emerging business risks. The findings also indicated that financial institutions in developing countries allocate more resources towards risk management than non-financial institutions. The Phi coefficient (degree of association) was 0.486, showing a moderately significant relationship between the variables (risk management and resource allocation). Business organisations in Zambia and other developing nations must develop sound risk mitigation plans and allocate resources for risk management.

Keywords: {'name': 'Risk management, Risk Resource Allocation, Zambia, Developing Countries'}

Authors & affiliations

Peter Silwimba
Affiliation not supplied

Olajide Solomon Fadun
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.14299/ijser.2018.02.005

DOI: 10.24912/ja.v26i1.821

DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2008.01.002

DOI: 10.1177/0148558X19850424

DOI: 10.1111/risa.13803

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-95527-4_2

DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.08.001

Fadun, O. S. (2013). Promoting enterprise risk management adoption in business enterprises: Implications and challenges. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 2(1), 69-78.

DOI: 10.20525/ijfbs.v9i1.634

DOI: 10.36096/brfb.v2i2.194

DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2021.2009090

DOI: 10.1111/jori.12035

DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2016.08.003

DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2016.06.007

Gallati, R. R. (2022). Risk management and capital adequacy. London: McGraw-Hill.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2009.06.006

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03747.x

DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6975.2011.01413.x

DOI: 10.1108/CG-02-2018-0092

DOI: 10.1108/CG-02-2018-0092

DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-95376-8_3

DOI: 10.1111/jacf.12155

DOI: 10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc041

DOI: 10.12968/nuwa.2019.10.30

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2311293

DOI: 10.3390/risks10090173

Musonda, K. (2020). A critical analysis of the internal risk management practices of the commercial banks in Zambia: A case study of the Zambia National Commercial Bank. Lusaka: Cavendish University.

Mwila, B. (2018). Disaster risk preparedness strategies against fire in urban markets in Zambia: a case study of Chisokone market in Kitwe (Doctoral dissertation).

DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-03-2021-0131

Penrose, E. T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

DOI: 10.1002/jcaf.22346

DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2018.1460723

DOI: 10.1590/0104-530x2315-19

DOI: 10.2307/2330757

DOI: 10.2307/3666152

Tursoy, T. (2018). Risk management process in the banking industry. Near East London: Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32430-8_3

DOI: 10.31920/The_Effect_of_the_Enterprise_Risk_Management

DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002392