CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / BRSSPUBLICATION RECORD

Reflections on implementing indigenous research paradigm and participatory action research: research with the indigenous people

Glen Maimela · Thizwilondi Madima ORCID ↗ · Justice Makhanikhe · Vhonani Netshandama ORCID ↗

Bussecon Review of Social Sciences · 2024 · Vol. 6 / Issue 2 · 01-07

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS1

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:01 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations1Cached provider observation

Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:23 UTC

Mendeley · Readers4Cached provider observation

Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:23 UTC

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

Researchers continue to conduct research within South African indigenous communities pertaining indigenous knowledge with little consideration of the existing indigenous research methodologies. This little consideration continues to exist because these indigenous research methodologies are merely taught in universities and the approach that is often used by most university researchers in conducting research on indigenous communities has elements of coloniality such as power that rests on the researchers over the communities where communities are labelled as the researched than contributors. This paper provides reflections on the participatory action research study conducted on the lenses of indigenous research paradigm in Ga-Mamabolo in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. The reflections concludes that the indigenous research paradigm offers a suitable roadmap for conducting research in indigenous communities. The contradicting research language between the western and indigenous paradigm is presented to improve the practice of research in indigenous communities. Research in indigenous communities is often conducted with little or no consideration of collaboration with the indigenous people. Thus, this paper contends that the review of existing Western research ethics may lay a foundation for new ethics that are culturally sensitive and promoting collaboration on research that affects the indigenous people.

Keywords: {'name': 'Research'}, {'name': 'Indigenous Research Methodologies'}, {'name': 'Participatory Action Research'}, {'name': 'Indigenous Communities'}

Authors & affiliations

Glen Maimela
Affiliation not supplied

Thizwilondi Madima
Affiliation not supplied

Justice Makhanikhe
Affiliation not supplied

Vhonani Netshandama
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Babbie, E. R. (2021). The Practice of Social Research. (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.

DOI: 10.1177/1940844720933225

DOI: 10.1177/1558689814527878

DOI: 10.1177/1468794117696176

DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.093641

DOI: 10.1038/s43586-023-00214-1

DOI: 10.7202/1068547ar

DOI: 10.28945/4463

DOI: 10.1186/s12910-016-0139-8

DOI: 10.1177/1609406918821574

DOI: 10.1002/9781119111931.ch41

DOI: 10.5430/wje.v6n3p48

Kang, E., & Hwang, H. J. (2023). The importance of anonymity and confidentiality for conducting survey research. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 4(1), 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.15722/jrpe.4.1.202303.1

DOI: 10.1080/02681102.2017.1323306

DOI: 10.4102/hts.v78i3.7428

DOI: 10.1111/medu.15154

DOI: 10.1186/s12912-016-0197-8

DOI: 10.36303/JMLSTSA.133

DOI: 10.1080/2159676X.2022.2146164

DOI: 10.22230/ijepl.2021v17n8a1065

DOI: 10.7748/nr.23.2.36.s8

DOI: 10.17159/2413-3221/2020/v48n2a541

DOI: 10.4102/td.v9i3.188

Tsotetsi, C. T., & Mahlomaholo, S. M. (2013). Teacher professional development programmes: what is missing? Journal of Educational Studies, 12(1), 89-102.

Watters, J., Comeau, S., & Restall, G. (2010). Participatory action research: An educational tool for citizen-users of community mental health services. Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Medical Rehabilitation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.