Limited Impact of the EU on Candidate States

Abstract

The employment policy is one of the most disputable areas between Turkey and the EU. The EU declared two opening conditions, one about union rights and the other one about preparing an action plan displaying step by step the transposing of EU laws. Although Turkey claims that she met those criteria, the EU insists on keeping the accession negotiations in this area closed. However, there is serious gap between Turkish and European employment policies and in order to comply with the EU’s, there is a strong need of enthusiasm in Turkey for proper implementation of changes made in legal and institutional structures. Simultaneously, the EU has to offer a considerable incentive, e.g. membership, for Turkey to encourage her to adapt EU rules in employment policy. Unfortunately, it is argued in this paper that the current situation is the opposite, i.e. there is no substantial incentive from the EU to encourage Turkey and thus, no enthusiasm from Turkey to comply with the EU policy. In order to analyze the impact of the EU on Turkey’s employment policy the main question designed in this paper is: ‘To what extent does the EU have influence on policy convergence in a candidate country that does not have a clear membership perspective? ‘. It is argued in this study that “without a concrete incentive, European Union’s impact on a candidate country would be limited”.  Thus, the patterns of policy change at the national level are the dependent variable to be observed. The European Union’s conditionality is the independent variable that is expected to alter the national patterns.

Keywords: {'name': 'EU'}, {'name': 'Conditionality'}, {'name': 'Institutionalizm'}, {'name': 'Europeanization'}, {'name': 'Employment Policy'}

Authors & affiliations

Hakan Cavlak
Affiliation not supplied

Davuthan Gunaydin
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

/391/EEC, Introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (Council 6 12, 1989).

/654/EEC, The minimum safety and health requirements for the workplace (Council 11 30, 1989).

/655/EEC, Minimum safety and health requirements for the use of work equipment by workers at work (Council 11 30, 1989).

/269/EEC, Minimum health and safety requirements for the manual handling of loads where there is a risk particularly of back injury to workers (Council 5 29, 1990).

/270/EEC, minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment (Council 5 29, 1990).

/383/EEC, Measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of workers with a fixed- duration employment relationship or a temporary employment relationship (Council 6 25, 1991).

/104/EEC, Minimum requirements for improving the safety and health protection of workers in surface and underground mineral-extracting industries (Council 12 3, 1992).

/29/EEC, Minimum safety and health requirements for improved medical treatment on board vessels (Council 3 31, 1992).

/57/EEC, Implementation of minimum safety and health requirements at temporary or mobile construction sites (Council 06 24, 1992).

/58/EEC, Minimum requirements for the provision of safety and/or health signs at work (Council 6 24, 1992).

/85/EEC, Introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding (Council 10 19, 1992).

/91/EEC, Minimum requirements for improving the safety and health protection of workers in the mineral-extracting industries through drilling (Council 11 3, 1992).

/103/EC, Minimum safety and health requirements for work on board fishing vessels (Council 11 23, 1993).

/33/EC, Protection of young people at work (Council 6 22, 1994).

/9/EC, Approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning equipment and protective systems intended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (European Parliament and the Council 3 23, 1994).

DOI: 10.1080/14683851003606739

DOI: 10.1057/ap.2009.26

DOI: 10.1093/0199252092.003.0003

DOI: 10.1057/ap.2009.31

Commission, E. (n.d.). Europe 2020. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index_en.htm

Council Recommendation 2003/134/EC, Improvement of the protection of the health and safety at work of self-employed workers. (Council 02 18, 2003).

Dimitrova, A., & Steunenberg, B. (2007). Compliance in the EU enlargement process: The limits of conditionality. European Integration online Papers, 11 (5).

ETF. (2011). Flexicurity analysis of the Turkish labour market. Turin: European Training Foundation.

EU-OSHA. (2014). Retrieved from The European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA): https://osha.europa.eu/en/oshnetwork/focal-points/turkey/index_html

European Commision. (2007). Towards Common Principles of Flexicurity: More and better jobs through flexibility and security. Brussels: Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.

European Commission. (1993). White Paper, Growth, Competitiveness, and Employment: The challenges and ways forward into the 21st century,. Brussels.

European Commission. (1997). Green Paper, Partnership for a New Organisation of Work.

European Commission. (2007). Towards Common Principles of Flexicurity: more and better jobs through flexibility and security. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.

European Commission. (2014). Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion. Retrieved from European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=716&langId=en

European Council. (2000, 03 23-24). Presidency Conclusions. The Lisbon Special European Council: Towards a Europe of Innovation and Knowledge. LISBON.

DOI: 10.1093/0199252092.003.0013

DOI: 10.1080/13501761003661935

DOI: 10.1080/14683840008721218

Kaliber, A. (2008). Reassessing Europeanisation as a Quest for a New Paradigm of Modernity: The Arduous Case of Turkey. In I. 4. Convention (Ed.), Bridging Multiple Divides. San Francisco.

DOI: 10.1017/S0020818304583017

DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00012

DOI: 10.4324/9780203458464_chapter_1

DOI: 10.1080/14683840500235456

DOI: 10.1177/0888325402239682

DOI: 10.1080/13608740500037916

DOI: 10.1080/13501760903226872

DOI: 10.1177/1354066100006001005

Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2005). Introduction: Conceptualizing the Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. In F. Schimmelfennig, & U. Sedelmeier, The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe (p. 7). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2005). The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2006). Candidate Countries and Conditionality. In P. Graziano, & M. Vink, Europeanization: New Research Agendas (pp. 8 – 11). Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

DOI: 10.1177/1465116508093490

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2102575

Yazıcı, H. (2012). Turkey-EU Relations and the Customs Union: Expectations versus the Reality. Turkish Policy Quarterly(Spring), 25 – 37.