A Study on Sustainable Innovation Profile of Turkey
Pelin Vardarlier · Rana Cakir
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2015 · Vol. 4 / Issue 4 · 24-35
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 02:02 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 02:02 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Innovation is the only way of solution to achieve sustainable growth, social welfare and employment in a country. This study principally focuses on the relationship between growth and innovation in the light of information derived from a general literature review about definition, sources and risks of innovation, and measurement of innovation performance. Then, the contributions of innovative capability on economic growth and employment as well as innovation systems on a country basis have been discussed, and accordingly, actions to be taken, including a shift in paradigm, for a growth-innovation-national innovation system and its sustainability have been addressed. In addition, current innovation performance indicators of Turkey have been discussed in the light of a scope which is outlined in the initial sections of the study, and the change in such performance indicators between 1998 and 2009 has been examined. After analysis of the above mentioned criteria and comparisons against practices in developed countries and communities, suggestions have been made about the activities to be carried out in order to make Turkey’s current innovation system “sustainable”, to support and improve innovation. In the study, a research application has been conducted using the content analysis method on the “President’s Message” letters of 158 state and foundation universities that are located in Turkey and that have a website, and the importance accorded to innovation by the universities has been determined.
Keywords: {'name': 'Innovation'}, {'name': 'Performance'}, {'name': 'National Innovation System'}, {'name': 'Growth'}
Authors & affiliations
Pelin Vardarlier
Affiliation not supplied
Rana Cakir
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
Beaty, J. (1998). Peter Drucker'a Göre Dünya. Sistem.
Chandler, D., Alfred, D., Miller, P., & Brankovic, A. (1990). Strategy and Structure. Chapters in the history of the industrial Enterprise, s. 284.
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.09.008
Dosi, G. (1988). The Nature of Innovative Process. Technical change and economic theory 2, 590-607.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2008.01.008
DOI: 10.1007/s001680000034
Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The economics of industrial innovation. Psychology Press.
DOI: 10.1177/0162243908329187
Hesen, J. F., & Barbara, A. (2003). Innovation capabilities of European Nations:Cross national analysis of patents and sales of product innovations. Copernicus Institute Department of Innovation Studies, 66.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.07.001
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-0539-2_1
DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2008.04.005
DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2008.04.005
DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2008.12.005
Mathews, R., & Watts, W. (2004). Sapmanın Yararları. Executive Exellence, 12-13.
DOI: 10.15581/002.ART-2049
OSLO. (2006). OSLO Handbook. OECD.
Özdemir, A. (2008). Ulusal İnovasyon Sistemi Türkiye Örneği. Marmara Üniversitesi.
Öztok, N. (2009). Yenilikçi Olmayanlar Ölümden Kaçamayacak. Capital.
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2004.11.004
Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. Simon & Schuster.
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.07.005
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Oxford University Press, 66.
Sebell, M. H. (2005). Geleceğe Ne Kadar Hazırsınız. Executive Exellence, 12-13.
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.09.008