Decision Making Through the Fuzzy TOPSIS Method
A. Oben Sabuncuoglu · Ali Gorener
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2016 · Vol. 5 / Issue 2 · 71-82
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:31 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:31 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Construction contractors have a great role in terms of operation work properly in construction project management. An effective contractor selection is most important to the success of any construction projects. Contractor selection is a multi criteria decision making problem which includes qualitative and quantitative characteristics. For the contractor selection problem, this study proposes a combined decision approach, which employs analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Fuzzy Technique Ordered Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods. In the proposed approach, AHP is used to determine the weights of selection criteria, and Fuzzy TOPSIS is used to select appropriate contractor alternative. Additionally, a real case study in construction industry is presented to illustrate the application of the proposed approach.
Keywords: {'name': 'Construction Projects'}, {'name': 'Contractor'}, {'name': 'Fuzzy Decision Making'}, {'name': 'AHP'}, {'name': 'TOPSIS'}
Authors & affiliations
A. Oben Sabuncuoglu
Affiliation not supplied
Ali Gorener
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2012.743922
DOI: 10.1023/B:JIMS.0000034112.00652.4c
Alcan, P., & Basligil, H. (2011). A Facility Location Selection Problem by Fuzzy TOPSIS, Proceedings of 15th International Research/Expert Conference ”Trends in the Development of Machinery and Associated Technology” TMT 2011, 329-332.
Allahverdi, N. (2005). Bulanık Mantık ve Sistemler, http://farabi.selcuk.edu.tr/egitim/bulanik/bulanik.htm
DOI: 10.1080/18756891.2013.769767
Barrie, D. S., & Paulson, B. C. (1992). Professional Construction Management: Including CM, Design-Construct, and General Contracting. McGraw-Hill.
DOI: 10.1108/17410380510626204
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.07.009
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.03.009
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00348-5
DOI: 10.1142/S0218488502001739
Çiftçioğlu, B. (2013). İnşaat Sektöründe AHP Yöntemiyle Yüklenici Seçimi: Bir Konut Projesinde Uygulama, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi FBE Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.10.004
Dinçer, H., & Görener, A. (2011). Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ve VIKOR Tekniği ile Dinamik Performans Analizi: Bankacılık Sektöründe Bir Uygulama, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19, 109-127.
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.11.050
Eleren, A., & Ersoy, M. (2007). Mermer Blok Kesim Yöntemlerinin Bulanık TOPSIS Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi, Madencilik, 46, 3, 9-22.
DOI: 10.1007/BF01441954
DOI: 10.1080/014461900407356
DOI: 10.1080/014461997373088
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1323(97)00016-4
DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v6n3p184
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.12.014
Kaptanoğlu, D., & Özok, A. F. (2010). Akademik Performans Değerlendirm3esi için Bir Bulanık Model. İTÜ Dergisi/d, 5, 1, 193-204.
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.04.004
DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2014.948910
Rençber, Ö. F., & Kazan, H. (2014). Büyük Çaplı Projelerde Taşeron Firma Seçiminde Teklif Değerlendirme: Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci Yöntemi İle Karar Verme, International Journal of Social Science Research, 3, 1, 11-24.
DOI: 10.21236/ADA214804
DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
DOI: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:1(62)
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2010.09.006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.092
Shahanaghi, K., & Yazdian, S. A. (2009). Vendor Selection Using a New Fuzzy Group TOPSIS Approach, Journal of Uncertain Systems, 3, 3, 221-231.
DOI: 10.1108/13552510810909975
Şen, Z. (2001). Bulanık Mantık ve Modelleme Ilkeleri. Bilge Kültür Sanat, İstanbul.
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.09.009
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.125
DOI: 10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5
DOI: 10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.181-187