Intergenerational Income Elasticity in Turkey

Abstract

Social scientists have been intrigued by the relationship between generations based on different characteristics. Economists, has been especially interested in measuring intergenerational income elasticity, which looks at the relationship of parents and that of their children when they become adults and gives clue on trends of income inequality. Most of the literature concentrates on the experiences of developed countries and measurement issues. Nevertheless, new studies concerning intergenerational income elasticity is being undertaken in developing countries as the data become increasingly available for these countries. In this vein, there is only one previous study that investigates intergenerational income elasticity for Turkey. Mercan (2012) finds that intergenerational income elasticity is around 0.1 in Turkey, which depicts Turkey as a highly mobile country meaning that children of poor parents have a higher likelihood to have a better income status. However, his study does not depend on a longitudinal dataset, which might make Mercan’s (2012) estimate biased. Following Solon (1992) in using OLS for lower bound and instrumental variable (IV) for upper bound, this study puts forth a new estimate, which relies on a nationally representative and longitudinal dataset for Turkey. The study's estimate for intergenerational income elasticity varies between 0.3 and 0.6, which is much higher than the result of Mercan (2012), indicating that Turkey is a less mobile country than previously foreseen.

Keywords: {'name': 'Integrated Mobility'}, {'name': 'Income'}, {'name': 'Earnings'}

Authors & affiliations

Murat Anıl Mercan
Affiliation not supplied

Hande Barlin
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1086/260831

DOI: 10.1086/298118

DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.04.010

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00690.x

DOI: 10.1086/506489

DOI: 10.1162/rest.91.4.766

DOI: 10.1016/S1049-2585(06)13006-9

DOI: 10.1257/jep.27.3.79

DOI: 10.5040/9798400643682.0059

DOI: 10.2202/1935-1682.1782

DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.2012.00495.x

DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2005.04.002

DOI: 10.1257/aer.96.4.1308

DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2014.1013853

DOI: 10.1515/bejeap-2013-0008

DOI: 10.1007/s00148-012-0464-2

DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.2008.00289.x

DOI: 10.1515/9781400835492.80

DOI: 10.1162/0034653053970249

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2647277

DOI: 10.3848/iif.2012.318.3259

DOI: 10.2202/1935-1682.1713

DOI: 10.2202/1935-1682.2339

DOI: 10.1016/0165-1765(93)90041-A

DOI: 10.2202/1935-1682.1711

DOI: 10.2307/1928066

DOI: 10.2307/1928066

DOI: 10.1257/089533002760278712

DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511492549.003

DOI: 10.1515/bejeap-2013-0008

DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2013.05.002

Zimmerman, D. J. (1992). Regression towards mediocrity in economic structure. The American Economic Review, 82(3), 409-429.