Relationship between Leader Behaviours and Subordinates’ Work Performance

Abstract

The paper assesses the relationship between leader behaviours and subordinates’ work performance in the context of tax administration. Data were collected in Malawi using two validated questionnaires administered online for subordinates and team leaders at a field office of a tax administration. Frequency distributions were used to identify dominant primary leader behaviours and the Spearman’s rank-order correlation analysis was used to assess the relationship between leader behaviours and subordinates’ work performance. Participative path-goal leadership behaviour is the most common primary leadership behaviour that team leaders in tax administration employ. Secondly, supportive and achievement oriented leader behaviours have a significant relationship with subordinates’ work performance in tax administration. The study concluded that achievement oriented path-goal leadership behaviour could be effective for public organisations involved in law enforcement. It is recommended that leaders should conduct a self-assessment of their leadership; adopt the relations-oriented leadership behaviours and incorporate coaching during performance evaluation exercise; and that organisations should equip leaders with leadership and management skills through training.The study is limited by the small sample-size, therefore, future studies could repeat the assessment with a larger sample and determine the mathematical equations for predicting the effect of each leadership behaviour on subordinates’ work performance.

Keywords: {'name': 'Leadership'}, {'name': 'Behaviour'}, {'name': 'subordinates'}, {'name': 'Path-Goal Theory'}

Authors & affiliations

Neria Magombo-Bwanali
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Aguinis, H. (2012). Performance management (3rd ed). Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Aris, A., & Kamarudin, M. F. (2009). The Impact of Path-Goal Leadership Behaviour on Group Cohesiveness: A Japanese Electronic Company and Singaporean Electronic Company in Johor. Journal of Human Capital Development (JHCD), 2(1), 1-11.

Armstrong, M. (2001). A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice (8th ed). London: Kogan Page.

DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207

Bass, B. M. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, & managerial applications (4th ed). New York: Free Press.

Bolden, R., Gosling, J., Marturano, A., & Dennison, P. (2003). A Review of Leadership Theory and Competency Frameworks. University of Exeter, Centre for Leadership Studies, University of Exeter. Retrieved at http://www2.fcsh.unl.pt/docentes/luisrodrigues/textos/Lideran%C3%A7a.pdf

DOI: 10.1177/1046496495261006

Charry, K. (2012). Leadership Theories - 8 Major Leadership Theories. Retrieved from http://psychology.about.com/od/leadership/p/leadtheories.htm

Daft, R. L. (2009). The Leadership Experience (4th ed). South Melbourne Vic: Cengage Learning.

DuBrin A. J. (2013). Leadership: Research findings, practice, and skills (7th ed). Mason, OH: South-Western.

Fomenky, N. F. (2015). The impact of motivation on employee performance. Global Conference on Business & Finance Proceedings, 10(1), 332.

DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.001

DOI: 10.4324/9780203496787

DOI: 10.1057/9780230584068

DOI: 10.5089/9781451865004.001

DOI: 10.5089/9781455296736.001

Kouzes, J.M., & Posner, B.Z. (2002). The Leadership Challenge. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Lamb, R. (2013). How can Managers Use Participative Leadership Effectively? Retrieved from http://www.task.fm/participative-leadership

Malawi Revenue Authority (2007). A concept paper with mandate and project plan for establishment of a Large Taxpayer Office. Blantyre: Malawi Revenue Authority.

Man M., Modrak V., Dima I.C., & Pachura P. (2011). A Theoretical Approach to the Job Satisfaction. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 4, 7-15.

Miner, J.B. (2002). Organizational Behaviour: Foundations, Theories, and Analyses. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Northouse, G. (2007). Leadership Theory and Practice. London, New Delhi: Sage Publication Inc.

Negron, D. (2008). A case study examining the relationship of the path-goal theory leadership styles to profits in El Paso, Texas, Rent-A-Center stores. (Doctoral dissertation) Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3331408). Capella University.

Polston-Murdoch, L. (2013). An Investigation of path-goal theory, relationship of leadership style, supervisor-related commitment, and gender. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 6(1), 13-44.

Ray, S., & Ray, I.A. (2012). Understanding Democratic Leadership: Some Key Issues and Perception With Reference To India’s Freedom Movement. Afro Asian Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 2229 – 5313.

Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T.A. (2009). Organizational behaviour (13th ed). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

Scottish Natural Heritage (2015). Collecting the information: Quantitative survey of businesses- Design considerations. Retrieved from http://archive.snh.gov.uk/vmm/5stakeholders.html

Shooshtarian, Z., & Amini, M. (2012). The study of relationship between leaders' behavior and efficiency and return on investment. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 6, 55-67.

University of the Fraser Valley (2007). Staff Performance Evaluation Questionnaire. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/file.PostFileLoader.html?id...assetKey

Yukl, G. A. (2012a). Leadership in organizations (8th ed). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

DOI: 10.5465/amp.2012.0088

DOI: 10.1108/02683940910952697

DOI: 10.6007/IJARAFMS/v4-i1/630

DOI: 10.1145/2145204.2145269

http://kraut.hciresearch.org/sites/kraut.hciresearch.org/files/open/Zhu12_SharedLeadership_final_submitted.pdf