Explore publications.

In an era where data-driven approaches are increasingly shaping decision-making in higher education, a notable gap remains in the use of survey methodologies specifically designed to inform and enhance student support initiatives. Despite the growing emphasis on evidence-based practices, few studies have systematically utilized survey data to inform institutional strategies and enhance student outcomes. This survey paper employs the Theory of Student Involvement and Appreciative Inquiry (AI) as a theoretical lens to guide the exploration of student support and enhance the MenTut programme, aiming to improve student wellbeing and success within our institution. Data were primarily collected from 1,446 undergraduates (mentees) who consented to the use of the data collected. A questionnaire with five (5) closed-ended Likert scale question items and one open-ended question was shared via Microsoft Forms to explore students’ experiences with MenTut. Closed-ended questions were analysed to provide descriptive graphs, while one open-ended question was thematically analysed. Although the findings show that many undergraduate students (mentees) were satisfied with the tutorial sessions offered, some concerns were raised regarding inadequate infrastructure, venue constraints, tutor communication and delivery, engagement and active learning, as well as tutors’ attitudes and professionalism. Drawing from findings, the paper recommends administering systematic and subsequent surveys each semester to evaluate the effectiveness of student support initiatives and to facilitate ongoing, data-informed improvements to the program. This paper concludes by proposing an Academic and Reflective Enhancement Theoretical Lens (ARETL) that could be adopted to enhance any student support programme in higher education institutions.

This qualitative study explores the MenTut Programme’s role in  fostering student engagement and academic success in higher education, using Leach and Zepke’s (2011) engagement framework. Thematic analysis of Mentee feedback reveals an enhanced understanding of complex content, improved assessment preparation, and increased self-directed learning. The programme fosters collaborative and supportive environments, enhancing academic confidence and retention, particularly among underrepresented students. The proposed MenTut Engagement Framework integrates student voices into programme design, offering a model for equitable support. This study provides insights for academic practitioners to enhance student outcomes

The rising costs of higher education have placed increasing financial pressure on students, with living expenses often becoming a significant burden. Many students struggle to balance tuition fees, academic responsibilities, and personal living costs, leading to financial stress and even delayed graduation. The aim of the research was to explore how sharing living expenses through cohabitation can alleviate financial burdens for students and offer broader economic benefits. The study investigated the financial advantages of cohabitation, focusing on how shared costs, such as rent, utilities, and food, contribute to financial stability and improved quality of life for students. The study adopted qualitative approach to get an in-depth exploration of how sharing living expense alleviate the financial burdens of students.  Through interviews with students who share living spaces, the research examined how cohabitation influences the financial well-being, academic performance, and overall mental health of students. The study explored the impact of shared living arrangements on fostering social connections and emotional support, which may further enhance students' academic and personal development. The study has provided valuable insights for students, higher education institutions, and policymakers seeking to address student financial burdens and improve student well-being through more affordable housing options.  

First-year students confront various difficulties when they move to higher education, especially in South African universities, which have a heterogeneous socio-economic environment. This study examined the "registration conundrum" students encounter while investigating the sociological factors affecting their experiences during this crucial beginning stage. A mixed-methods approach was used to record the depth and breadth of first-year students' experiences, integrating qualitative interviews with quantitative questionnaires. Ten first-year University of Venda students participated in the study, which provided detailed information about the participants' emotional and personal experiences during the registration procedure. Purposive sampling was used to choose the participants. Findings indicated that inadequate access to resources, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and socio-economic inequality significantly heightened stress and anxiety levels among students, leading to delayed academic engagement. The study also emphasized how race, gender, and class intersect to influence students' registration experiences and how those experiences affect their academic achievement and social integration. According to the research, to improve educational equity and accessibility, higher education institutions must implement inclusive and flexible registration procedures that consider the particular difficulties faced by first-year students. In addition to illuminating the subtleties of student experiences, this sociological viewpoint advocates for legislative changes meant to enhance South Africa's higher education system. The study complied with ethical standards for privacy, anonymity, informed consent, confidentiality, and harm avoidance.

The conception and focus of Siyaphumelela Project were on the promotion of student success through the support programmes rolled out by the university’s support units. For the past ten years of the Siyaphumelela Project’s life, academic departments were left out, and they were not involved when data was elicited from student. The primary objective of this conceptual paper was to offer a critical analysis of the impact of Siyaphumelela Project on student access and success and how caring pedagogy influenced student learning and success in one school of teacher education in South Africa. We used Caring Pedagogy as a frame of reference in reflecting on building relationships, compassionate classrooms and promoting student learning. In this study we used desktop research.  Firstly, data identified that faculties and units are operating in silos instead of building solid relationships. Secondly, the research findings identified a need to create compassionate classrooms and caring environments. As part of conclusion, the paper recommends the case Teacher Education to adopt Caring Pedagogy perspectives and holistic and inclusive and integrated and empathetic approach. Furthermore, to foster within Siyaphumelela Project compassionate classrooms and caring environment that promotes collegial and collaborative working space and fosters student learning and success.