CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope discovery

Explore publications.

Search the participating collection. Refine by journal, year or data source.

Browse journals · Browse publishers

INDEXED PUBLICATIONS2
CROSSREF CITATIONS1
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS50.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.5

Crossref citation coverage: 2 / 2 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 00:21 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

Research collection

2 publications

JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Interest Rate in Loanable Funds Theory, Keynes, and Keynesian

Keun Lee

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2025

Read abstract

In the loanable funds theory, the interest rate serves as a balancing factor between the savings offered for loans and the funds borrowed for investment. In Keynes’s theory, by contrast, it is a monetary phenomenon that balances the demand and the supply of money. At first glance, the monetary phenomenon of the interest rate may seem quite different and is often considered groundbreaking and revolutionary. In Keynes’s theory, people hold part of their savings in money to cope with uncertainty about the returns from long-term bonds, and it is savings held in money that leads the interest rate to be a monetary phenomenon. While people hold part of their savings in money, they also invest their savings by purchasing long-term bonds. The interest rate also balances savings offered, though only in part and not the whole, and funds borrowed in the bond market, as in the loanable funds theory. In this regard, Keynes’s theory and the loanable funds theory are not as strikingly different as it may first appear. The main exegetical work of Keynes’s ideas is Keynesian economics. In this theory, the interest rate is also a monetary phenomenon, as is expected of exegetical work. However, it is not due to savings held in money as in Keynes’s theory; rather, it is due to the cash holdings required for purchasing goods and services. This paper examines the differences among these three interest rate theories, the reasons behind them, and their practical implications.    

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v14i3.43750 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Comparative Interpretation of Classical and Keynesian Fiscal Policies (Assumptions, Principles and Primary Opinions)

Engin Oner

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2015

Read abstract

Adam Smith being its founder, in the Classical School, which gives prominence to supply and adopts an approach of unbiased finance, the economy is always in a state of full employment equilibrium. In this system of thought, the main philosophy of which is budget balance, that asserts that there is flexibility between prices and wages and regards public debt as an extraordinary instrument, the interference of the state with the economic and social life is frowned upon. In line with the views of the classical thought, the classical fiscal policy is based on three basic assumptions. These are the "Consumer State Assumption", the assumption accepting that "Public Expenditures are Always Ineffectual" and the assumption concerning the "Impartiality of the Taxes and Expenditure Policies Implemented by the State". On the other hand, the Keynesian School founded by John Maynard Keynes, gives prominence to demand, adopts the approach of functional finance, and asserts that cases of underemployment equilibrium and over-employment equilibrium exist in the economy as well as the full employment equilibrium, that problems cannot be solved through the invisible hand, that prices and wages are strict, the interference of the state is essential and at this point fiscal policies have to be utilized effectively.Keynesian fiscal policy depends on three primary assumptions. These are the assumption of "Filter State", the assumption that "public expenditures are sometimes effective and sometimes ineffective or neutral" and the assumption that "the tax, debt and expenditure policies of the state can never be impartial".

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v4i2.2131 Crossref citations4 OpenAlex citations